Discrimination in RE Brokerage

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member


Douglas Elliman drops Ramona Singer after report of racial slur​

Bravo star joined Michael Lorber’s team at the brokerage in 2021

Ramona Singer is out of a job at Douglas Elliman after Vanity Fair published a behind-the-scenes exposé into Bravo’s “Real Housewives” franchise.
The former “Real Housewives of New York City” star was axed by the residential brokerage on Tuesday, Page Six reported. The firing appears to be part of the fallout from the outlet’s reporting Singer used the N-word in a conversation with a Black crew member during filming for the last of her 13 seasons on the show.

Singer joined Elliman in November 2021, and has since been a member of broker Michael Lorber’s team, which represented her in 2019 to sell her Upper East Side condo for $4 million.
Elliman did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Real Deal. Representatives from Bravo and for Singer didn’t immediately provide comment to Page Six.

Singer isn’t Elliman’s only tie to the “RHONY” franchise. Broker Kelly Bensimon appeared in the show’s third season with Singer years before joining the brokerage, but the two were castmates again in Bravo’s ongoing spinoff, “Real Housewives Ultimate Girls Trip.” Bensimon joined Elliman’s Holly Parker Team in 2019 and launched her own team in 2022, the same year the firm named her Rookie of the Year
Elliman agent Erin Lichy was among six new cast members revealed after a lengthy production pause. The network blamed “scheduling challenges” for the holdup between seasons, but Vanity Fair reported the delay was due to a reunion canceled when Singer refused to address the alleged racial slur before the show was revamped entirely.
A complaint was filed after the alleged incident, but an internal investigation into the incident was “inconclusive.” Page Six reported Singer, in a text with a reporter, tried to downplay her use of the word after the report had also caused her removal from the three-day BravoCon in Las Vegas.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

Elliman makes case against Section 8 lawsuit, calling it ‘manufactured’​

Voucher holder claimed brokerage and star agents didn’t help her find apartment

Douglas Elliman accused a lawyer Friday of engineering a lawsuit by a rental voucher holder against the firm and dozens of agents. The brokerage also laid out several reasons for why it feels the case is unwarranted.
The lawsuit, by Long Island resident Shaniqua Newkirk, said household names in brokerage including Noble Black, Tamir Shemesh, Frances Katzen and Tal and Oren Alexander did not help her find an apartment in New York City because she planned to use a Section 8 voucher.

Newkirk said roughly 30 current and former Elliman agents ghosted her or ignored her emails completely, violating her rights under the federal Fair Housing Act and source-of-income discrimination laws in New York.
But in a letter Friday to Newkirk’s attorney Steven Siegel, a lawyer for Elliman contended that Newkirk wasn’t discriminated against, that her complaint was filed too late and that Siegel coached her for the purpose of suing.

“Shaniqua Newkirk — an alleged Section 8 voucher holder — carried out a plan, under your counsel and direction, to manufacture claims … based on her unsolicited emails to DE agents inquiring about apartment availability,” attorney Jessica T. Rosenberg wrote.
Siegel did not return a request for comment.
Rosenberg argued that it is not discriminatory to ignore an email, as several Elliman agents did, or to inform a tenant the agent had no apartments in the customer’s price range. Her points reflected a sentiment commonly held in the industry, judging by comments on The Real Deal’s Instagram post about the lawsuit.

“DE agents can receive hundreds of cold call emails and phone calls every week from prospective buyers and renters,” said Rosenberg. “The agents she targeted generally specialize in high-end luxury real estate sales, not rental listings; indeed, the agents were directly lifted from a publication listing ‘award winning agents’ at DE.”

Attorneys without specific knowledge of Newkirk’s case who spoke to TRD in September said ignoring an email from a Section 8 holder, a legally protected class, can amount to denial of service.
But an interpretation of fair housing and source-of-discrimination laws might not matter if a judge agrees with Elliman’s claim that Newkirk needed to file her complaint within two years of the alleged discrimination.
Elliman also argued that Newkirk’s allegations against executives of the brokerage, including chief counsel Kenneth Haber and Long Island CEO Ann Conroy, don’t hold up. The firm’s rationale is that agents are not employees — they are independent contractors — and that Newkirk’s argument that executives “knew or should have known” about the agents’ behavior cannot sustain her claim.
“Douglas Elliman has a zero tolerance policy towards unfair and illegal treatment of any individual or group,” an Elliman spokesperson previously told TRD. “We pride ourselves on our mandatory agent training program that is inclusive of rigorous fair housing law education.”

 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

Agency finds probable cause in discrimination suit against Bespoke​

NY Human Rights Division calls for hearing, but questions some of Jarret Willis’ claims

The New York State Division of Human Rights has found probable cause regarding a discrimination complaint filed by former Bespoke executive Jarret Willis against the brokerage and its founders, Cody and Zachary Vichinsky.
The investigation stems from a complaint Willis, who is Black, filed in February, in which he alleged that another employee addressed him by the N-word and that various employees referred to him as Jafar, the villain from “Aladdin,” in a derogatory manner.

Willis also alleges the word “kike,” an anti-Jewish slur, was frequently used at the firm’s Hamptons office and that the brokerage withheld from him hundreds of thousands of dollars in commissions.
The department is pushing for a hearing, according to a legal filing obtained by The Real Deal, calling one necessary to settle “material issues of fact” that the investigation could not resolve.

The report also states that “questions are raised as to the accuracy of the claims.”
“It must be noted, however, that the record also gives rise to the appearance that a personal dispute between complainant and both respondent Vichinskys occurred contemporaneously such that the allegations comprise situations and interactions that, while now held to be discriminatory, may not have originally been viewed in that manner,” states the report.
Willis’ attorney, Adam Leitman Bailey, said they “could not be happier with the results” of the investigation.
“I’ve been doing this a long time but I don’t usually get probable cause findings this resounding in favor of [the] litigant,” said Bailey. “There’s not one claim they found was disingenuous or didn’t exist, there’s not one claim they dismissed or did not take.”
Bailey said Willis has since been paid his outstanding commissions.

The finding of probable cause, according to Bailey, means the government is willing to try Willis’ case should he elect not to pursue a private action. The lawyer added that the division skipped the typical mediation process in favor of a hearing, which he deemed a further sign of the “egregiousness” of Bespoke’s alleged transgressions.
In a statement in March, Bespoke “unequivocally” denied the claims. Asked to comment Thursday, Cody Vichinsky and his lawyer declined.
Willis’ complaint, filed in New York Supreme Court, alleges that another employee, Lisa Kling, addressed him by the N-word. The complaint provided text messages between the two as evidence. Kling was not disciplined for the behavior and was promoted to Cody Vichinsky’s personal assistant, according to the complaint.
After Willis temporarily moved to Bespoke’s Florida office, employees there allegedly referred to him as Jafar, which he alleges was a derogatory reference to “the manipulative, brown-skinned magician” in the Disney movie “Aladdin.” His work account was allegedly set to “Jafar24!”, which led to his resignation. He also alleges he wasn’t given a desk because of his race.
Willis also contends he was shown a racist Instagram video and was excluded from the Hamptons Classic, a major social bash held each summer in Bridgehampton, where Bespoke rented a booth and to which all employees except him were allegedly invited.

He further contends that “kike” was frequently uttered in the Hamptons office, prompting another employee, Harlan Goldberg, to file his own complaint against the company.
According to the investigation, Willis alleged that the power imbalance between him and the Vichinskys led to “feigned acceptance of, and feigned participation in, their bigotry.”

Although Willis initially viewed the Vichinskys as friends, he told investigators their relationship soured in 2019, when, during Cody Vichinsky’s bachelor party, Zachary Vichinsky remarked to Willis that his brother “spends money like a [N-word].”
At that point, Willis decided he would simply “go through the motions” of friendship with the two so as not to jeopardize his employment, according to the report.

Willis says he believed there was a sexual relationship between Cody Vichinsky and Kling, causing him to tolerate her behavior for the sake of his employment.
He says he was stripped of his position as vice president of Bespoke Parallel, a division of Bespoke, in April 2022, due to his race, after having repeatedly not been informed of showings.
Bespoke told the investigators that Willis deleted his own texts when submitting exchanges between himself and Kling as evidence of her discriminatory behavior. The omissions demonstrate the deceptive nature of the allegations, according to the brokerage.
Investigators, in their report, said they found some issues with Willis’ story.
“The record reflects, and [Willis] admits, that such language had been used throughout the five years preceding when he first claims to have taken issue with it,” reads the report. “Moreover, this timeline contravenes the assertion that [he] only engaged in this conduct to ingratiate himself with respondents.”

Bespoke portrayed a starkly different reality to investigators, calling the complaints “nothing more than a shakedown against a former employer who treated him like family.”
According to the investigation, numerous correspondences support Bespoke’s position that Willis was, in the Vichinskys’ words, “the one engaging in offensive language and behavior while expressing immense gratitude for his position.”
If anything, the Vichinskys say, because of their friendship, they gave preferential treatment to Willis, who before working at Bespoke attended Cody Vichinsky’s wedding in 2014. They say Willis was the firm’s highest compensated agent when he resigned. They also assert it was “well-known” that Willis and Kling were friends.
Bespoke said Willis did not need a desk due to the nature of his job and because he had a physical presence at a nearby location. It also pointed to his promotion to an executive level as evidence of his favorable treatment.
Bespoke provided investigators with messages that show Willis routinely referred to himself as “Jafar,” including that he would “Jafar” clients, meaning “attempt to manipulate them,” according to the Vichinskys.

Bespoke also alleged Willis used racially offensive language in referring to himself and Bespoke clients, and said that he never complained of discrimination or disparate treatment during his tenure with the brokerage.
It also pointed to a text Willis sent three weeks before instructing the Vichinskys to communicate with his attorney rather than him, in which he wrote he was grateful “to have you and your beautiful families in my life.”
But investigators also were dubious of Bespoke’s explanation for supposedly failing to pay Willis his commissions.
“Given the context alleged to exist with respect to all of [Willis’] assertions, the record supports the contention that respondents’ proffered reasoning amounts to pretext for discriminating” against him, the report says. “Because the Division is unable to discern the specific circumstances surrounding the alleged acts of discrimination, nor assess credibility at this time, a hearing on this matter is warranted.”

 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

Three Long Island agents lose licenses over Newsday discrimination exposé​

Suspensions, fines follow 2019 investigation

An undercover investigation by Newsday into housing discrimination on Long Island has resulted in penalties for some brokers ensnared in the probe.

The New York Department of State revoked licenses from three agents, suspended the licenses of seven and fined five between $500 and the maximum allowed of $2,000.
There were a total of 36 agents named in Newsday’s Long Island Divided series, the outlet reported. Decisions are pending against five of them, while cases were dismissed against four. In two instances, the state dropped their cases, while the state didn’t pursue discipline for 10 of them.
Himanshoo Sanghvi (who worked for Century 21 American Homes at the time of Newsday’s series), was among the agents who lost their licenses. He offered opinions on a local school district and referred to a neighborhood as a “mini United Nations.” He was initially suspended six months before an appeal led to the revocation of his license.
The other agents to have their licenses revoked by the state were Aminta Abarca of Keller Williams Realty of Greater Nassau and Anne Marie Queally Bechand of Signature Premier Properties in Cold Spring Harbor.
Not every case resulted in discipline. Ana Pizaro, who worked at Signature Premier Properties, allegedly gave a white tester 18 listings in Plainview and Syosset and none in Huntington, but gave a Hispanic tester more than 60 listings in Huntington — a predominantly Hispanic area — and few in Plainview and Syosset. Her case was dismissed because investigators didn’t provide evidence establishing the race of the testers and couldn’t prove “discriminatory intent.”

RE/MAX Beyond associate broker Joy Tuxson told a white tester that Wyandanch — a hamlet with a predominantly Black and Hispanic population — the area was a good place to “buy your crack.” Her license was ultimately suspended until the completion of a fair housing course, but that discipline was connected to separate comments she made about schools.

She took a three-hour course the day she learned of the suspension and had her license restored the very next day. Her license status lists her as an associate broker with RE/MAX Integrity Leaders.
Newsday’s three-year probe involved sending undercover testers to meet with agents and secretly videotaping allegedly discriminatory action.
State and local authorities have followed up the investigation with increased efforts to tackle discrimination and comply with fair housing laws. Long Island Realtors unveiled a fair housing campaign a couple of years ago. In November, New York Attorney General Letitia James launched a program to fund fair housing testers across the state.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

Another broker settles Section 8 discrimination case​

Small-time Westchester firm nabbed by callers posing as voucher holders

Rental brokers continue to tell apartment seekers that Section 8 is not welcome at certain complexes — unaware that the practice is illegal, or not realizing that the callers are actually posing as prospective tenants and recording the conversations.

The latest to be tripped up is real estate agent Pasquale Marciano, who owns Century 21 Marciano and NewRoc Property Management, Westfair Business Journal reported.
Agents overseen by New Rochelle-based Marciano, who handles 13 properties with a total of 76 units, allegedly turned away undercover investigators who indicated they would use Section 8 housing vouchers to pay rent.

The callers, from nonprofit Housing Rights Initiative, reported their findings to New York Attorney General Letitia James, who pursued the case and this week announced a settlement with Marciano, the publication reported. The small-time Westchester County operator will have to fork over $40,000 to the state and make various changes to his business.
Marciano must put anti-discrimination language on rental applications, advertise that his units can be rented with government subsidies, ensure rental application fees are capped at $20, and waive broker fees for five years in deals involving government subsidies.
The settlement also requires Marciano to place nine tenants using Section 8 other government subsidies into units.
According to the attorney general, Century 21 Marciano had a policy barring holders of Section 8 housing vouchers from submitting rental applications. Under state law, that is source of income discrimination.

New York City-based HRI told The Real Deal that it has seen a significant decline in discrimination against its callers since it began testing brokerages, property managers and landlords some years ago.

It is not the only fair-housing nonprofit using fake Section 8 tenants to expose people in the rental housing industry who don’t know or don’t follow the rules.
Long Island Housing Services testers have negotiated five-figure settlements with a number of rental complexes in Nassau and Suffolk counties, most recently in Smithtown.
Operators of 72-unit Willow Lake Apartments allegedly told applicants they needed a credit score of at least 680 and income of three times the annual rent, or $90,000, not counting any vouchers, Newsday reported.
LIHS brought a case against Willow Lake, which settled for $19,500.
 
Top