Congestion On Purpose

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
For decades we have seen the lobbyists at Transportation Alternatives push city government to remove parking spaces and cause congestion on purpose. It's my opinion that not only is this bad for small businesses hut actually causes more pollution.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
NY Governor, Mayor, etc are still acting as if all the public transportation should bring people to Midtown even as companies are fleeing the area.

Putting a tax on cars trying to enter won't help. City council members know this, which is why so many voted for it to drive more business away from Manhattan below 60th St and towards their districts. (Plus getting lobbied by Uber/Lyft to cause congestion on purpose).
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
It is unfortunate that it has gotten to this point. I applaud Mayor Adams for recognizing the urgency, but he needed to get in his horse back when he was Brooklyn Borough President.

"Hank Gutman, a former transportation commissioner under Mr. de Blasio who was a member of the B.Q.E. panel, said it was “wishful thinking” to believe a new plan could be adopted, approved and built before the structure becomes unsafe. “They have run out of time and options without employing the measures that we announced and adopted last year,” he said."

The B.Q.E. Is Crumbling. There’s Still No Plan to Fix It.
Mayor Eric Adams wants to jump-start the project, but some critics have raised safety concerns.
The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, known as the B.Q.E., was built in the 1940s. In 2016, city officials warned that if nothing was done, they would have to restrict trucks by 2026.

The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, known as the B.Q.E., was built in the 1940s. In 2016, city officials warned that if nothing was done, they would have to restrict trucks by 2026.

The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway is slowly crumbling from the road salt and moisture that has weakened its concrete-and-steel foundation, and from all the overweight trucks that it was never designed to carry.
But six years after New York City officials sounded the alarm over the B.Q.E., there is still no consensus about what to do with this vital but outdated highway from the 1940s, which carries 129,000 vehicles a day.
At least a half-dozen plans have been floated, fractious public meetings and rallies have been held and a mayoral panel of experts worked for more than a year to come up with more options.

“It’s been a lot of effort just trying not to make things worse, but we haven’t been able to make it better,” said Jake Brooks, 47, a law professor, whose apartment building sits beside the B.Q.E. and shakes from the vibrations of cars and trucks hitting potholes and bumps.

Now, the saga of the B.Q.E. is taking another turn as Mayor Eric Adams aims to start construction within five years on a yet-to-be-developed plan to fix the highway. That upends a proposal made in 2021 by Mr. Adams’s predecessor, Bill de Blasio, to temporarily shore up the highway for 20 years at a cost of more than $500 million to give the city more time to work out a permanent solution.
“Our moment is right now,” Mr. Adams said in a statement. “I will not wait decades and needlessly spend hundreds of millions of additional taxpayer dollars when we can and must start rebuilding this vital transportation artery today.”
Fast-tracking the project, the mayor added, will allow the city to potentially tap into billions in new federal infrastructure funds that were unlocked by the Biden administration and use them to help pay for one of the city’s most expensive transportation projects. Under federal legislation passed last year, cities can apply for grants each year until 2026.

“We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to access the federal funding necessary to reimagine and rebuild the B.Q.E. that a post-pandemic economy and city demand, and we are seizing it,” Mr. Adams said.

The mayor — who has a closer working relationship with Gov. Kathy Hochul than Mr. de Blasio did with former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo — is also in “active discussions” with state officials about overhauling the entire highway, which runs about 18 miles, instead of focusing on just the 1.5-mile section that the city controls, city officials said.

But some elected officials, community leaders and residents have questioned whether the city really can implement a new plan in just five years and have expressed concerns about cutting back on extensive repairs to shore up the existing structure in the meantime.
“There are no easy solutions; if there were, we would have done it many years ago,” said Brooklyn city councilman Lincoln Restler, who has criticized the Adams administration for not aggressively carrying out repairs. “This has been kicked down the road because it is so hard.”

Hank Gutman, a former transportation commissioner under Mr. de Blasio who was a member of the B.Q.E. panel, said it was “wishful thinking” to believe a new plan could be adopted, approved and built before the structure becomes unsafe. “They have run out of time and options without employing the measures that we announced and adopted last year,” he said.
The B.Q.E. was built in sections between 1944 and 1948 during the era of Robert Moses, the influential planner who expanded the city’s roadways. Long known for narrow lanes and potholes, the highway also has a cherished feature: a pedestrian promenade in Brooklyn Heights with sweeping views of the Manhattan skyline that is suspended over traffic by an unusual triple cantilever structure.
The roadway is supported by steel rebars inside concrete. They are corroding from road salt that seeped in through cracks, which have widened from freezing and thawing and moisture.

Sign up for the New York Today Newsletter Each morning, get the latest on New York businesses, arts, sports, dining, style and more. Get it sent to your inbox.
In 2016, city officials announced they would rehabilitate the 1.5-mile section between Atlantic Avenue and Sands Street in Brooklyn, warning that if nothing was done, they would have to restrict trucks by 2026 to reduce the weight on the highway.

The B.Q.E. panel later concluded the highway was deteriorating even faster, in part because of all the trucks exceeding the 40-ton federal weight limit. At the panel’s urging, two of the six lanes were eliminated last August, which has reduced vehicle traffic.

In 2018, city officials presented two options to rebuild the highway, which were rejected by critics, including Mr. Adams, then the Brooklyn borough president. One plan called for closing the Brooklyn Heights promenade for up to six years and erecting a temporary highway over it to redirect traffic while work occurred below.
Many of these critics envisioned a city with fewer cars and saw the B.Q.E. overhaul as an opportunity to do something about the worsening traffic that has choked neighborhoods with gridlock and pollution and made streets more dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists.

Counterproposals were floated. The City Council weighed in with an $11 billion plan to tear down the highway and replace it with a three-mile-long tunnel. Scott Stringer, the former city comptroller, proposed limiting part of the highway to trucks and converting another part into a two-mile-long park.
There will be no consensus on the B.Q.E., said Samuel I. Schwartz, a transportation engineer who has worked on the highway. He recommended that Mr. Adams and Ms. Hochul just set a deadline to come up with a new plan — and then move ahead with it over almost certain opposition.
“The city and state have to be together on this,” he said. “If they’re willing to commit to a decision one year from now, then it’s a good plan.”

Hazel Crampton-Hays, a spokeswoman for the governor, said, “The state is ready to support the city on the rehabilitation project, including by securing federal infrastructure funding.”

City officials said they will continue making necessary highway repairs, including some laid out in Mr. de Blasio’s 20-year plan. They have set aside $100 million for a dedicated contractor to make repairs identified by regular inspections. Sensors were also installed on the cantilever last year to monitor its vibrations and movements.
Next year, the city will begin rebuilding parts of two deteriorating bridge sections near Grace Court and Clark Street in Brooklyn, which will allow restrictions on trucks to be delayed until 2028. An automated ticketing system to enforce truck weight limits is to go into operation early next year.
Because Mr. Adams wants to initiate a more permanent fix to the B.Q.E. within five years and is committed to current expressway repairs, city officials said that longer-term repairs, like extensive work on bridge decks and joints, will no longer be necessary.
But in recent months, many community leaders and residents have grown increasingly frustrated and concerned over what they see as the city’s lack of transparency and urgency about the expressway.

Pia Scala-Zankel, a writer whose family’s brownstone in Brooklyn Heights overlooks a section of the expressway, said that she has not seen any repairs being made below her home over the past year. She has repeatedly asked the city transportation agency for an update on the repairs, but has heard nothing. “It’s like a slap in the face,” she said.
Mr. Restler, the city councilman, said that any B.Q.E. plan would require “a meaningful degree of community consensus,” given the complex governmental approvals and environmental reviews required. “No plan can be shoved down our throats by City Hall or anyone else,” he said.

Administration officials said they have been taking time to review the B.Q.E. project and will commence public meetings this month to work with the community on a new expedited plan.

Lara Birnback, the executive director of the Brooklyn Heights Association, a leading neighborhood voice, said that local residents and drivers would welcome a plan sooner rather than later, though she noted, “There are so many caveats and ifs there — all of the pieces would have to line up in the right way for that to be feasible.”

She added that many in the community hope the city will do more than simply patch up the aging highway.
“We’ve moved beyond that,” she said. “People would be upset not to see something more transformative, more green and more 21st century.”
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

Public weighs in on NYC's congestion pricing plan at 1st public hearing​

Nearly 400 people signed up to speak, and 81 actually got a chance to do so.

The MTA is giving New Yorkers a chance to weigh in on its controversial congestion pricing plan.

The agency held the first of six virtual public hearings Thursday night, and while nearly 400 people signed up to speak, 81 actually got a chance to do so.

The agency's plan calls for tolling drivers between $9 and $23 a day to drive south of 60th Street.

During off-peak hours, the toll would be between $7 and $17. Overnight, the rate would drop to between $5 and $12.

It is part of a plan to raise a billion dollars for subway and bus improvements while also limited congestion in the heart of Manhattan.

Thursday night's virtual public hearing was jammed with drivers and others, most of whom blasted the idea and demanded discounts and exemptions.

The hearing started at 5 p.m. and stretched nearly seven hours, finally wrapping up at 11:40 p.m.

Here's a sample of what MTA officials heard:

"It's going to be the death of lower Manhattan, and all the businesses are going to move out anyway," said NYC resident Suzette. "If you guys are gonna tell me I need to pay $23 to take my car out every day, it's outrageous."

"We do not have adequate mass transit service and yet we're expected to pay for your bloated and out of control agency," said Assemblyman Mike Lawler from the 97th Assembly District.

"I think that this plan will be able to save lives by decreasing the levels of traffic violence currently in our streets, streets that are belong to the public and belong to all of us," said Felipe Castillo.

"We're trying to get more people to come back to our city, and I think this is going to have a detrimental impact on that," said NY Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis.

"Congestion pricing is set to be a win-win-win for the city economy, transit system, traffic reduction efforts and overall safety," said Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso.

Taxi, Uber and Lyft drivers are begging Gov. Kathy Hochul for some relief, worried they will be run out of business if the plan goes into effect.

Motorists on FDR Drive and the West Side Highway would be exempt.

The question remains: who else would get an exemption?

The MTA's plan is based on London's congestion pricing model. All residents in that city's congestion zone can get a 90% discount on the toll.

As of now, there is no such exemption in New York City's plan.

All of this comes as the MTA struggles to bring back riders after the pandemic.

About 40% of people who took the subway before COVID hit have not returned.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
It is unfortunate that it has gotten to this point. I applaud Mayor Adams for recognizing the urgency, but he needed to get in his horse back when he was Brooklyn Borough President.

"Hank Gutman, a former transportation commissioner under Mr. de Blasio who was a member of the B.Q.E. panel, said it was “wishful thinking” to believe a new plan could be adopted, approved and built before the structure becomes unsafe. “They have run out of time and options without employing the measures that we announced and adopted last year,” he said."

The B.Q.E. Is Crumbling. There’s Still No Plan to Fix It.
Mayor Eric Adams wants to jump-start the project, but some critics have raised safety concerns.
The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, known as the B.Q.E., was built in the 1940s. In 2016, city officials warned that if nothing was done, they would have to restrict trucks by 2026.

The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, known as the B.Q.E., was built in the 1940s. In 2016, city officials warned that if nothing was done, they would have to restrict trucks by 2026.

The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway is slowly crumbling from the road salt and moisture that has weakened its concrete-and-steel foundation, and from all the overweight trucks that it was never designed to carry.
But six years after New York City officials sounded the alarm over the B.Q.E., there is still no consensus about what to do with this vital but outdated highway from the 1940s, which carries 129,000 vehicles a day.
At least a half-dozen plans have been floated, fractious public meetings and rallies have been held and a mayoral panel of experts worked for more than a year to come up with more options.

“It’s been a lot of effort just trying not to make things worse, but we haven’t been able to make it better,” said Jake Brooks, 47, a law professor, whose apartment building sits beside the B.Q.E. and shakes from the vibrations of cars and trucks hitting potholes and bumps.

Now, the saga of the B.Q.E. is taking another turn as Mayor Eric Adams aims to start construction within five years on a yet-to-be-developed plan to fix the highway. That upends a proposal made in 2021 by Mr. Adams’s predecessor, Bill de Blasio, to temporarily shore up the highway for 20 years at a cost of more than $500 million to give the city more time to work out a permanent solution.
“Our moment is right now,” Mr. Adams said in a statement. “I will not wait decades and needlessly spend hundreds of millions of additional taxpayer dollars when we can and must start rebuilding this vital transportation artery today.”
Fast-tracking the project, the mayor added, will allow the city to potentially tap into billions in new federal infrastructure funds that were unlocked by the Biden administration and use them to help pay for one of the city’s most expensive transportation projects. Under federal legislation passed last year, cities can apply for grants each year until 2026.

“We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to access the federal funding necessary to reimagine and rebuild the B.Q.E. that a post-pandemic economy and city demand, and we are seizing it,” Mr. Adams said.

The mayor — who has a closer working relationship with Gov. Kathy Hochul than Mr. de Blasio did with former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo — is also in “active discussions” with state officials about overhauling the entire highway, which runs about 18 miles, instead of focusing on just the 1.5-mile section that the city controls, city officials said.

But some elected officials, community leaders and residents have questioned whether the city really can implement a new plan in just five years and have expressed concerns about cutting back on extensive repairs to shore up the existing structure in the meantime.
“There are no easy solutions; if there were, we would have done it many years ago,” said Brooklyn city councilman Lincoln Restler, who has criticized the Adams administration for not aggressively carrying out repairs. “This has been kicked down the road because it is so hard.”

Hank Gutman, a former transportation commissioner under Mr. de Blasio who was a member of the B.Q.E. panel, said it was “wishful thinking” to believe a new plan could be adopted, approved and built before the structure becomes unsafe. “They have run out of time and options without employing the measures that we announced and adopted last year,” he said.
The B.Q.E. was built in sections between 1944 and 1948 during the era of Robert Moses, the influential planner who expanded the city’s roadways. Long known for narrow lanes and potholes, the highway also has a cherished feature: a pedestrian promenade in Brooklyn Heights with sweeping views of the Manhattan skyline that is suspended over traffic by an unusual triple cantilever structure.
The roadway is supported by steel rebars inside concrete. They are corroding from road salt that seeped in through cracks, which have widened from freezing and thawing and moisture.

Sign up for the New York Today Newsletter Each morning, get the latest on New York businesses, arts, sports, dining, style and more. Get it sent to your inbox.
In 2016, city officials announced they would rehabilitate the 1.5-mile section between Atlantic Avenue and Sands Street in Brooklyn, warning that if nothing was done, they would have to restrict trucks by 2026 to reduce the weight on the highway.

The B.Q.E. panel later concluded the highway was deteriorating even faster, in part because of all the trucks exceeding the 40-ton federal weight limit. At the panel’s urging, two of the six lanes were eliminated last August, which has reduced vehicle traffic.

In 2018, city officials presented two options to rebuild the highway, which were rejected by critics, including Mr. Adams, then the Brooklyn borough president. One plan called for closing the Brooklyn Heights promenade for up to six years and erecting a temporary highway over it to redirect traffic while work occurred below.
Many of these critics envisioned a city with fewer cars and saw the B.Q.E. overhaul as an opportunity to do something about the worsening traffic that has choked neighborhoods with gridlock and pollution and made streets more dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists.

Counterproposals were floated. The City Council weighed in with an $11 billion plan to tear down the highway and replace it with a three-mile-long tunnel. Scott Stringer, the former city comptroller, proposed limiting part of the highway to trucks and converting another part into a two-mile-long park.
There will be no consensus on the B.Q.E., said Samuel I. Schwartz, a transportation engineer who has worked on the highway. He recommended that Mr. Adams and Ms. Hochul just set a deadline to come up with a new plan — and then move ahead with it over almost certain opposition.
“The city and state have to be together on this,” he said. “If they’re willing to commit to a decision one year from now, then it’s a good plan.”

Hazel Crampton-Hays, a spokeswoman for the governor, said, “The state is ready to support the city on the rehabilitation project, including by securing federal infrastructure funding.”

City officials said they will continue making necessary highway repairs, including some laid out in Mr. de Blasio’s 20-year plan. They have set aside $100 million for a dedicated contractor to make repairs identified by regular inspections. Sensors were also installed on the cantilever last year to monitor its vibrations and movements.
Next year, the city will begin rebuilding parts of two deteriorating bridge sections near Grace Court and Clark Street in Brooklyn, which will allow restrictions on trucks to be delayed until 2028. An automated ticketing system to enforce truck weight limits is to go into operation early next year.
Because Mr. Adams wants to initiate a more permanent fix to the B.Q.E. within five years and is committed to current expressway repairs, city officials said that longer-term repairs, like extensive work on bridge decks and joints, will no longer be necessary.
But in recent months, many community leaders and residents have grown increasingly frustrated and concerned over what they see as the city’s lack of transparency and urgency about the expressway.

Pia Scala-Zankel, a writer whose family’s brownstone in Brooklyn Heights overlooks a section of the expressway, said that she has not seen any repairs being made below her home over the past year. She has repeatedly asked the city transportation agency for an update on the repairs, but has heard nothing. “It’s like a slap in the face,” she said.
Mr. Restler, the city councilman, said that any B.Q.E. plan would require “a meaningful degree of community consensus,” given the complex governmental approvals and environmental reviews required. “No plan can be shoved down our throats by City Hall or anyone else,” he said.

Administration officials said they have been taking time to review the B.Q.E. project and will commence public meetings this month to work with the community on a new expedited plan.

Lara Birnback, the executive director of the Brooklyn Heights Association, a leading neighborhood voice, said that local residents and drivers would welcome a plan sooner rather than later, though she noted, “There are so many caveats and ifs there — all of the pieces would have to line up in the right way for that to be feasible.”

She added that many in the community hope the city will do more than simply patch up the aging highway.
“We’ve moved beyond that,” she said. “People would be upset not to see something more transformative, more green and more 21st century.”
https://www.brownstoner.com/brooklyn-life/bqe-repair-public-hearings-adams-vision/

Mayor Adams Wants to Keep the BQE, Plans to Counter Highway’s ‘Racism’ With Parks, Plazas​

It seems the mayor has made up his mind. The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway will stay, necessary repairs will be made, and the administration hopes to mitigate the “racism built into our infrastructure,” as he put it, by creating parks and plazas under the highway.
The new plan, consisting of two parts dubbed BQE Central and BQE North and South, will tap national funding available thanks to the recently passed Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The decision was slipped into an announcement Friday of a forthcoming community engagement process.
At one time, Brooklynites debated getting rid of the highway altogether, as other cities have done, or replacing the crumbling cantilevered section that passes under the Brooklyn Heights Promenade with a ground-level roadway covered with green hills in Brooklyn Bridge Park. The Brooklyn Greenway Project has been creating parks and plazas under the highway for years in an attempt to knit back together the communities destroyed when Robert Moses built the BQE in the mid 20th century with federal highway funds.

map

A map shows the sections of the highway covered by BQE Central and BQE North and South. Image via NYC Department of Transportation
Friday’s announcement was light on details about how exactly the rickety triple cantilever section will be repaired or rebuilt, but said immediate steps to maintain it are already in place, construction will begin in five years, and the Department of Transportation’s existing Triple Cantilever Joint Venture will continue.
That joint venture includes AECOM USA Inc., an engineering firm widely used in NYC projects that has proposed extending the subway to Red Hook and rebuilding the sleepy historic neighborhood with skyscrapers a la Hudson Yards. Also in the joint venture is high-profile Dumbo-based architecture firm Bjarke Ingels Group, one of two groups who have proposed replacing the existing cantilever with a ground-level roadway running through Brooklyn Bridge Park and covered by grassy hills.

Locals vehemently rejected DOT’s initial scheme to rebuild the cantilever by replacing the protected Brooklyn Heights Promenade with a temporary highway running just a few feet from landmarked townhouses overlooking the waterfront in Brooklyn Heights.

The DOT is planning “community outreach” to inform citizens of its plans and to help “develop designs for reuniting communities north and south of the BQE by creating public spaces like parks and plaza and providing new mobility options for commuting, recreation and commerce,” the press release said. “These communities have suffered for decades from increased traffic pollution and road safety risks after being divided by the highway,” it added.

“It’s time to take a new approach to the BQE and ‘Get Stuff Done,’” said Mayor Adams in the release. “Our administration is seizing a once-in-a-generation opportunity to partner with communities and develop a bold vision for a safe and resilient BQE. Together, we are finally confronting the racism built into our infrastructure and putting equity front and center to modernize this vital transportation artery now.”
DOT Commissioner Ydanis Rodriguez said in the release, “We must reckon with the harm these 20th-century highways have caused communities of color in New York City. While we undertake the BQE Central project, we will ensure we are also planning how best to reconnect other neighborhoods that have been split apart by this highway, from Bay Ridge to Greenpoint.”
The release listed a mix of virtual and in-person sessions:

September 28: Corridor-wide kickoff (virtual)
October 6: Corridor-wide kickoff (virtual)
October 11: BQE Central workshop (in-person)
October 13: BQE Central workshop (virtual)
November 3: BQE North and South workshop (virtual)
November 7: BQE South workshop (in-person)
November 10: BQE North workshop (in-person)

The mayor’s plans align with recommendations in a January 2020 report from the BQE Expert Panel, according to President and CEO of New York Building Congress Carlo Scissura, who chaired the report panel in 2019 and 2020.
The report rejected DOT’s initial proposal while stopping short of embracing Bjarke Ingels’ vision. A City Council engineering report the following month recommended the latter. Meanwhile, congestion pricing, which the city is currently considering, has the potential to further alter traffic patterns in Brooklyn and citywide.
“We also look forward to an eventual corridor-wide, full re-imagination of the BQE from Staten Island to The Bronx that serves people, communities and the entire city,” he said in a prepared statement quoted by Brownstoner sister pub Politics NY. “In the name of sustainability and equity for those impacted by the mistakes of yesteryear, all options for a greener, fully modernized, community-focused roadway must be considered.”
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

NYC’s privileged bicyclists won’t even discuss best way to stop bike deaths​

The death of Devra Freelander, a young cyclist killed by a truck last week, spurred outrage among cyclists and demands for more bike lanes. So how do we prevent such tragedies from happening again?
We know one thing: A million miles of protected lanes wouldn’t have saved Freelander. She was killed at an intersection, having hurtled from the sidewalk through a red light in front of the oncoming truck, which wasn’t speeding and had the right of way.
The two things that might have prevented this horror — training and adherence to rules — are tellingly absent from the protesting cyclists’ list of demands. Not to put too fine a point on it, cyclists are frequently their own worst enemy, and their presence has made everyone less safe.

Of course, automobiles are more dangerous than bikes, but adding cyclists to the mix, many of whom refuse to obey traffic laws, has compounded that hazard.
When Mayor Mike Bloomberg began wedging bike lanes into our already crammed streets, it wasn’t to meet a demand — it was to create one. To promote cycling, he and then-DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan, a bike enthusiast, threw caution to the wind and encouraged cyclists to hit the streets without so much as a helmet law, which might have deterred ridership, especially among the affluent, arrogant, scofflaw cyclists who want to use the city as their own personal racetrack.
Then came Citi Bike, offering up cumbersome, unwieldy and garishly colored bikes to inexperienced riders. Suddenly, without any training or education, thousands of New Yorkers were riding alongside hulking trucks and buses, whose blind spots are exacerbated by the speed and narrow silhouettes of bicycles.

It was a recipe for disaster, and the disproportionately influential, ceaselessly kvetching bicycle-advocacy groups capitalized on every heart-rending fatality to further their agenda.
Nobody elected the advocacy outfit Transportation Alternatives to speak for New Yorkers. It isn’t a safety organization, a cadre of seasoned city planners or even some impartial arbiter seeking what’s best for everyone; it’s a bunch of mainly upscale cyclists trying to make the city more navigable for themselves.
Yet for some reason they are permitted to dictate the configuration of our streets. The authorities have shoehorned more and more bike lanes into the gutters at their behest, even though the city wasn’t designed to safely accommodate both automobiles and bikes, making any unbroken route for cyclists physically impossible.

Many of our major thoroughfares now have one side of the street reserved for buses and the other for bicycles, leading to frequent and sudden bike-lane obstructions whenever vehicles need access to a curb or construction is underway. Even protected bike lanes are still subject to foot traffic, and everyone from joggers to skateboarders has adopted the lanes as their own.
Adding insult to injury, soon e-bikes, offering all the speed of a bicycle with none of the effort, will call the lanes home as well. What could possibly go wrong?

Meanwhile, pedestrians have borne the brunt of the onslaught. While not all cyclists flout the rules, far too many exceed speed limits, obstruct crosswalks, run red lights, ride in the wrong direction and hop sidewalks without compunction, admonishment or penalty. Big Apple cyclists have earned their disrepute.

It’s not at all unusual to see them texting or riding hands-free as they careen through traffic. Close calls have become a daily occurrence, especially for the elderly and disabled, whose reflexes aren’t ideal for evading speeding cyclists.
Case in point, two months ago, 67-year-old Donna Sturm died after being mowed down by a cyclist who ran a red light in Midtown. If bicyclists can ride fast enough to kill, they ride too fast to enjoy exemption from the training, certification, insurance and identifiable licensing required for the use of every other vehicle on our streets.
Bike lanes haven’t made anyone any safer, but they have inarguably taken traffic congestion from bad to intolerable. The narrowing of our city’s critical arteries to accommodate a tiny minority whose vehicles are rendered impractical all winter and on rainy days seems to have been irrationally prioritized with regard to triage.

Buses, delivery trucks, taxis, emergency responders and sanitation vehicles, which provide essential services and transportation for millions, are needlessly delayed for one third of the year while the lanes lie dormant; and even during more meteorologically hospitable months the sheer disparity between the number of people who benefit from bike lanes and those for whom they are a hindrance begs redress.
The carnage we have seen this year is a direct result of the free ride and false sense of security given to cyclists by the mayor and his predecessor. New York City is not safe for bikes, and it never will be.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
This is why the MTA needs "Congestion Pricing." If they actually wanted to reduce congestion NYC has much better options including stopping causing congestion on purpose.
https://gothamist.com/news/grand-ce...-the-mta-is-running-empty-trains-there-anyway

Grand Central Madison is closed, but the MTA is running empty trains there anyway​


The MTA is running trains into the gleaming new Long Island Rail Road station beneath Grand Central Terminal – but the public isn’t allowed aboard.
An internal MTA memo obtained by Gothamist shows that on Jan. 11 the LIRR operated 40 empty trains in or out of the station, dubbed Grand Central Madison. MTA officials said the LIRR regularly tests the new service by running trains without riders.
Gerard Bringmann, an MTA board member, said he was told the agency plans to do another “dress rehearsal” of full service on Thursday with no riders aboard. MTA representatives declined to confirm the plan.
The MTA previously planned to open the station by the end of 2022, a deadline set after years of construction delays. The project was originally scheduled to wrap up in 2011.
“I’ll be retired before it happens,” said LIRR rider Kevin Brosnan, 60, after getting off a train at Penn Station.
Brosnan, who lives in Farmingdale and works on the Upper East Side, said the new service could save him an hour of commuting time per workday. “I'll believe it when it’s there, we’ve been hearing this for years,” he said.

The empty service on Jan. 11 was a dry run for what the MTA calls Grand Central Direct, a shuttle with up to two trains an hour between the new Midtown station and Jamaica Terminal. MTA officials announced the service last month as a temporarily truncated version of full service into the new station, which is slated to run up to 24 trains per hour.
But the debut hasn’t happened yet due to a problem with the ventilation system at Grand Central Madison.
The ghost trains are regularly running into the new station while LIRR riders wait for the MTA to fix the problem. The MTA has said the empty trains are used for training workers on the new tracks and terminal.
“Test trains that run sporadically are designed to familiarize staff with new tunnels, signals and related infrastructure,” MTA spokesperson David Steckel wrote in a statement.
Bringmann — who represents LIRR riders on the MTA board — said it’s good that the agency is running safety tests.
"While I'm disappointed with the ventilation issue that's holding up the opening of Grand Central Madison, when it comes to the MTA taking a PR hit versus the safety of our riders, it's a no brainer,” said Bringmann. “Rest assured, the responsible party for this delay, be it the contractor or the mechanical engineer, will be held accountable.”

When full train service to Grand Central Madison opens the MTA plans to boost LIRR train service by 41%.
To prepare, agency officials said the LIRR has hired 207 new workers. There are now 2,500 workers in total trained to operate service into the new terminal — all of whom had to learn how to run trains in the new tunnels and into the new terminal, officials said.
The project — which federal records show costs $11.6 billion, a figure that includes plans to purchase train cars for the service — promises “a new experience” for commuters. But so far the MTA hasn’t said when that experience will be available. While the project has been in the works for more than 20 years, MTA Chairman Janno Lieber last week promised it would be days and weeks, not months, until the service opens.
“It’s a little frustrating, I wish there was an actual opening date,” said LIRR rider Jessica Findlayter, 26, who commutes from Nassau County. She said the new station’s opening would save her two-and-a-half hours a day because her office is next to Grand Central Terminal. The new service would also keep her from paying two subway fares a day to get from Penn Station to Manhattan's East Side.
“I could wake up a little later, maybe make breakfast at home,” she said.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
wabc
TRAFFIC
BIPARTISAN BILL AIMS TO STOP NEW YORK CITY'S CONGESTION PRICING PLAN
By Eyewitness News
Thursday, January 19, 2023

The bipartisan Anti-Congestion Tax Act was proposed by two congressman, New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer and New York Republican Matt Lawler. Marcus Solis has the story.
FORT LEE, New Jersey (WABC) -- A new plan was unveiled by a pair of suburban lawmakers Thursday to stop congestion pricing in its path.

The bipartisan Anti-Congestion Tax Act was proposed by two congressman, New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer and New York Republican Matt Lawler.

They've drawn up legislation to defund the MTA at the federal level if congestion pricing is put in place.

"New York City and the MTA are playing Russian roulette with their economy, and are willing to stick it to all of those hard-working commuters from Jersey, the outer boroughs, and the New York City suburbs, like my friend Congressman Lawler represents, with their absurd $23 a day Congestion Tax plan," Gottheimer said.

RELATED | New Jersey congressman declares war on NYC's congestion pricing plan

NJ congressman declares war on NYC congestion pricing plan

The MTA says congestion pricing is good for the environment and would benefit the riding public.

Drivers hate the idea.

"What if you work in downtown, $23 a day times five, that's almost $125," one driver said.

"I might have to find a new way, I might have to take the bus, I don't think I'm gonna be able to drive, that's too much," motorist Geraldo Gomez said.

Gottheimer said he believes the congestion tax plan won't reduce congestion or pollution and will disproportionately impact low-income drivers.

Lawler called congestion pricing, "a ludicrous tax grab by the country's most mismanaged authority, should be stopped dead in its tracks."

Meanwhile, New York Governor Kathy Hochul said she doubts the legislation proposed on Thursday would pass the Senate.

"We are now at the community involvement stage, so it is moving forward, I am committed to this, it is on a track to move forward," Hochul said. "It's important for this community."

Washington sends the MTA about $2 billion a year and gave $15 billion in COVID relief.
.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
So we need Congestion Pricing for more of this?
https://nypost.com/2023/03/03/pols-slam-kathy-hochul-for-commuter-mess-after-grand-central-madison-

Pols slam Hochul for ‘Hunger Games’ LIRR commutes as gov brushes it off​

Long Island pols vented their rage Friday over what they called an “absolutely rushed” rollout by Gov. Kathy Hochul of the Grand Central Madison rail hub – causing mayhem for suburban commuters all week long.[/COLOR]
Hochul, meanwhile, asked about the Jamaica LIRR hub commuters being forced to make a [COLOR=var(--wp--custom--color--link)]mad dash to far away platforms[/COLOR] for connections — and endure commutes that are as much as an hour longer to get into the city — largely blew off the concerns in a call for patience.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]“If the public is willing to give us some time to make the necessary adjustments, we’ll get it right,” Hochul answered The Post at an unrelated Albany press conference.
[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]Adding to the tone-deaf response to the working men and women’s pleas for help, Hochul added, “MTA leadership has been literally on the ground” evaluating the collateral damage done by shifting trains to the $11.6 billion station, long-delayed under predecessors like disgraced ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, which [/COLOR][COLOR=var(--wp--custom--color--link)]she opened to much fanfare[/COLOR][COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)] in late January.[/COLOR][/COLOR]
Grand Central Madison provides Long Islanders with a direct route to the East Side of Manhattan – but for commuters not working in midtown, it’s become a “Hunger Games” situation of crowded trains, missed connections, and longer rides because service got diverted from other hubs.

“As usual, the photo ops of officials riding into the shiny new stations go off without a hitch while the actual daily riders must be patient,” Assemblyman Ed Ra (R-Garden City) lamented Friday in response to Hochul.
A bit more time spent on figuring out how best to balance the limited resources of the LIRR might have saved the newly-elected governor some serious political grief.

Some LIRR tracks can only use diesel locomotives while others are fully electric, further complicating efforts to weave Grand Central Madison into the web of existing routes.

“This mayhem shows that the opening was absolutely rushed,” Assemblyman Jarrett Gandolfo (R-Patchhogue), one of many pols who say they have been flooded by constituent complaints on the matter.

“It’s frustrating that for years, LIRR riders have seen fares rise while the service experience never improved. Now the governor wants to increase taxes on Long Islanders to get them out of financial trouble yet against. It’s not exactly fair,” Gandolfo added in reference to Hochul’s controversial budget proposal to increase the payroll mobility tax.


And it was not like the MTA, which includes the LIRR, did not have plenty of time to consider how best to balance existing trains once Grand Central Madison gave LIRR riders another direct route into Manhattan beyond Penn Station, pols say.

“They’ve had probably close to 20 years to figure out the transition for East Side Access,” state Sen. Jack Martins (R-Nassau) while referring to the long-awaited opening of a direct rail link between Long Island suburbs and Grand Central Station. “There’s absolutely so accountability – and the buck stops with the governor.”
Hochul said Friday she does not think the MTA or her administration rushed the opening of the station despite hiccups that have included the breakdown of key escalators the day after its Jan. 25 opening.

She also argued that Grand Central Madison was still serving the greater good despite the cascade of complaints from commuters about the station where the sheer depth below street level adds even more time for people getting to work.
“I’ve heard from many people. I was on Long Island yesterday. They’re thanking me for this opportunity to get to the East Side without having to go all the way over to the West Side and backtrack. So it depends who you ask. But there’re a lot more people that are happy that they have this opportunity,” she insisted.

But fellow Democrats say they, like their colleagues across the aisle, are getting dozens of angry calls and emails each from constituents about their disrupted trips into the five boroughs.

And pols say the governor’s push for more funding for the MTA in the state budget due April 1 is hardly well-timed given the ongoing nightmare experienced by people in Nassau and Suffolk counties where Republicans have made big gains in recent elections.
“The MTA’s history of failing to meet customer expectations, combined with its repeated request for additional funding without addressing underlying service and operations issues, only reinforces the need for greater accountability and efficiency within its operations,” state Sen. Monica Martinez (D-Hauppauge) said.

State Senate Consumer Protection Chair Kevin Thomas (D-Garden City) told The Post his constituents are “suffering” amid the off-the-rails changes to their daily journeys via key hubs like Penn Station in Manhattan, Jamaica, Queens and Atlantic Terminal in Brooklyn.

“The buck stops with the governor on any matter involving a state-controlled entity. And what we have here is they wanted to open up a new station, but they did not think of the consequences of, or they should have thought about the consequences of, changing the schedule,” he said.

The LIRR currently lacks a permanent leader amid ongoing controversy over inflated labor costs at the regional rail system – including $130 million in unnecessary spending on conductors and assistant conductors alone revealed by a recent Post probe.
Hochul said Friday her administration is “working” on finding someone to lead the LIRR long-term.

If things do not shape up fast, it could undermine Democrats’ hopes of ever regaining key congressional and state Senate swing district they lost in 2022 with Hochul at the top of the ticket in the closest gubernatorial election in a generation.

Nassau County Legislator Josh Lafazan suggested that liar Rep. George Santos (R-Nassau), who has told a long list of whoppers about his personal and professional background, might even end up beating the MTA in a popularity contest unless Long Islanders see their commutes getting back on track soon.

“People are outraged and they are saying the same thing: How can this be so screwed up and who’s accountable?” Lafazan said. “The approval rating for the MTA and the LIRR is probably hovering right around George Santos’ approval rating.”
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

What Does the Potential Demise of Lyft Mean for Citi Bike?​

It’s not a great time to be Lyft. The ride-hailing company announced last month that co-founders Logan Green and John Zimmer would be stepping down after months of internal discord over plummeting stock prices, defecting drivers, and a vanishing customer base. The new CEO has described himself as skilled at “doing more with less.” Like so many tech companies that swore to solve our urban-transportation problems, Lyft promised to end traffic and lower emissions but, up until the past few years, relied mostly on cars to achieve these goals, making getting around cities even worse. But it’s not just the ride-hailing service that’s in trouble. Lean times at Lyft could spell trouble for its near monopoly on the country’s bike-share market.
If you’ve taken a bike-share ride in the U.S. in the past few years, chances are very good it was on a bicycle operated by Lyft. Four of the five top bike-share systems by ridership in the country — New York City, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington D.C. — are run by Lyft, which also runs popular systems in three smaller, bike-friendly cities: Denver; Portland, Oregon; and Columbus, Ohio. Lyft is the operator for other U.S. systems, like Boston’s, and in 2022, Lyft purchased PBSC Urban Solutions, a bike-share-equipment company that supplies docks and bikes for 45 systems globally. Even if your city’s bike share isn’t listed in its app, Lyft may have had a hand in growing it in one way or another.

Lyft’s move into the bike-share industry began in 2018, when the company acquired Motivate, the largest bike-share operator in North America, which, at the time of the acquisition, ran the bike-share systems in eight U.S. cities — about 80 percent of all of the country’s bike-share trips. Lyft originally positioned its foray into bike share as part of building the ultimate multimodal-transportation app, bundling its ride-hailing services with bike or e-scooter rental or the ability to buy transit tickets. Its rival Uber was plotting the same thing. Notably, Uber, which is rebounding from its pandemic slump thanks to a global footprint and pivot to food delivery, sold off its dockless bike- and scooter-share unit in 2020. But Lyft put money into its acquisition, making new deals with cities that helped to usher many legacy systems into a new era by making capital investments — as U.S. systems hit the decade-old mark, many need new equipment such as docks and bikes.

For many cities, the infusion of Lyft’s start-up cash has been a good thing. In New York City, Lyft paid more than $100 million in 2018 for a major Citi Bike expansion that promised to double the existing service area, bring docks into neighborhoods previously underserved by bike share, and triple the size of the fleet, including the addition of some very popular new e-bikes. (Lyft’s role in New York City is different from that of Citi Bike’s sponsor, Citi, which paid $70.5 million in 2014 for an advertising contract, including naming rights, that runs through 2024.) The timing was fortuitous. During the pandemic, bike share became a lifeline for New Yorkers amid the unpredictability of COVID-variant surges and subway-service cuts. Last September, as transit still struggled to hit pre-2020 numbers, Citi Bike announced record-breaking single-day ridership. Flexible, nimble, and low cost compared with other sustainable-transportation modes such as rail, bike share is a quiet success story.

But because so many cities, including New York, have outsourced their bike-share system operations to the private sector, a single company now exerts near-total control over them. And Lyft’s budgeting calculations have previously left riders around the country stranded. Last month, Lyft shut down Nice Ride, Minneapolis’s bike-share program, which started in 2010, claiming it was unable to cover the system’s $2 million operating gap after a health-care company pulled out as sponsor. (Lyft reported $1.2 billion in revenue last quarter.) Last year, Lyft suddenly pulled its bike-share systems out of Santa Monica, California. And unlike transit agencies, which must vote on operational changes, Lyft can make major modifications to how people get around their cities without consulting anyone. Over the past two years, people who use San Francisco’s Bay Wheels system have been shocked by huge price increases and unexpected rate changes. “It’s cheaper to rent a brand new pickup truck on @Getaround,” wrote an angry user, posting his $48.17 receipt for a two-hour trip. In Portland, riders are outraged by a hike in per-minute fees for new e-bikes that replaced an aging nonelectric fleet, meaning no cheaper options exist.
That market volatility, plus a general wariness of being at the mercy of Silicon Valley start-ups, has led several U.S. cities to investigate forming their own bike-share systems. Some cities own their docks and bike fleets outright, but only a handful of bike-share systems in the U.S. are publicly operated or managed. Boston completely restructured its Hubway system and is now municipally owned as Blue Bikes (though Lyft remains the operator). Detroit’s and Pittsburgh’s systems are run as nonprofits. In some cities, including Austin and Los Angeles, bike share is managed by and integrated into the public-transit system down to the payment structure. (In L.A., a single Metro Bike ride is $1.75, the same price as a single trip on a bus or train.) The latter model is the one preferred by many advocates. “When you make bike share part of public transit, then you start to see it as this tool to fill in the gaps in areas not served by existing parts of the system,” says Kiran Herbert, communications manager at the Better Bike Share Partnership. “You also recognize the need to subsidize it as you would transit.”

Even if Lyft starts making bike-share cuts in the name of cost savings, it’s unlikely New York City will see the same fate as Minneapolis. Although Minneapolis’s Nice Ride was setting ridership records, the maintenance of the older equipment was racking up expenses, and the system would have required a total upgrade to stay functional. This cost would have been peanuts to Lyft, especially as a newly minted owner of a bike-share-equipment company. But Lyft says its deal with the city also changed: In recent years, Minneapolis shifted from a long-term exclusive contract with Lyft to a one-year licensing agreement with multiple vendors. The situation isn’t similar for a system like Citi Bike, says Alex Engel, communication director for the National Association of City Transportation Officials and one of the authors of its December 2022 micromobility report. “Shared micromobility is no stranger to the boom-and-bust cycle of VC-funded ventures,” he says. “However, the largest systems are fundamentally strong: They have high ridership and, importantly, high utilization with each bike used numerous times per day, cutting down maintenance costs per rider.” Citi Bike — which has seen a 33 percent year-over-year increase in ridership so far in 2023 — also has the model that’s preferred by Lyft: an exclusive, multiyear, public-private partnership that Lyft says justifies infrastructural improvements and service expansions. “Systems work best when there is a long-term partnership with the city and a smaller number of operators to allow for mutual investment and partnership opportunities,” says Lyft spokesperson Jordan Levine. That bodes well for Citi Bike. But if smaller bike-share systems can’t offer the same type of funding, commitment, or exclusivity, it might make them victims of Lyft’s bottom line.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

We’re Another Step Closer to Congestion Pricing​

By Alissa Walker, a Curbed senior writer
97f5566cc599dc04e86c5e4aa82284940e-nyc-traffic.rhorizontal.w700.jpg

Photo: Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Image
The first congestion-pricing plan in the country is tentatively set to move forward. The Federal Highway Administration has given its blessing to New York City’s plan after an environmental review determined a “Finding of No Significant Impact” over a project area that encompasses 28 counties across three states. In what has become an agonizingly drawn-out process — the state legislature approved congestion pricing in 2019, for those keeping track — the MTA has cleared one more hurdle in its quest to charge drivers to enter Manhattan below 60th Street. To say that the agency could really use the plan’s projected $1 billion in annual revenue is an understatement.
Friday’s announcement was cheered by Kathy Hochul and Eric Adams, but there was discord brewing on the other side of the Hudson: In response to the news of the approval, New Jersey governor Phil Murphy said that he supports the idea “conceptually,” but that the plan places an “unjustified financial burden on the backs of hardworking New Jersey commuters.” While deciding how to fairly toll drivers is critical to the program’s success — which is why the review process included hearing from hundreds of them — it’s a very strange thing for Murphy to say when four out of five people who commute from New Jersey to Manhattan currently ride transit and would, well, benefit from the plan. Nevertheless, Murphy and New Jersey congressman Josh Gottheimer (whose “Stay in Jersey” campaign accidentally touted the benefits of congestion pricing) have threatened legal and legislative action.

There’s a lot more beyond a tantalizingly steady stream of transit revenue riding on New York’s success. Congestion pricing is an idea that’s been proposed in one form or another for decades, but the timing is particularly auspicious as New York City leaders fret about drawing more foot traffic and commercial tenants to the very same central business district. What happens here will also reverberate far beyond the region to determine the path forward for other U.S. cities hoping to charge drivers to access their downtowns. Everything from the pricing — which the MTA has said could range between $5 to $23 per car and would fluctuate based on the time of day — to deciding what transit improvements are prioritized for funding will set standards for other cities to implement. It’s important for the MTA to get this right.
And that’s the next, extremely critical part of the process. A six-member review board — including Adams’s nominee, Transport Workers Union president John Samuelsen — will make their recommendations for how the tolling scheme should work, including proposing any carve-outs or exemptions for certain drivers or vehicles. The MTA will then take the board’s recommendations, draw up the final plan, and lay out the steps for implementation, which will include deploying the physical tolling infrastructure throughout Manhattan. This part could still take a year or so, but the end is finally in sight — buckle up, because congestion pricing is likely coming in 2024.

 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
Penn Station's $7B overhaul to be paid for by federal and state subsidies, Hochul says
A rendering of an airy Penn Station concourse with light shining in through a glass ceiling and entrance..
Governor's Office


It’s back to the drawing board for the plan to renovate Penn Station, Gov. Kathy Hochul said Monday.

After five years of relying on former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s plan to use fees from 10 new skyscrapers to help pay for an overhaul of the train hub and its surrounding area, Hochul now says the estimated $7 billion of work will be paid for by state and federal subsidies.

The announcement comes after the developer Vornado backed away from plans to build new skyscrapers near the station last year due to low demand for office space.

Hochul said the MTA will run the redesign of the station, which is owned by Amtrak. Preliminary renderings of the plan released Monday are similar to previous ones released by the MTA, with a new skylight and a single concourse with high ceilings.

Amtrak officials said they support the plan. NJ Transit, which runs trains into Penn Station, has not committed to help fund the renovations, and didn’t appear at the Hochuls’ press conference at the station on Monday.

Hochul said the MTA will seek bids from contractors for the station’s redesign.

“We’re going to be open now to any architect, any design firm, any engineer, to allow them the opportunity to compete for a position,” Hochul said.

Officials have no plans to relocate Madison Square Garden in order to bring more natural light into Penn Station.
A rendering of a new, light-filled entrance to Penn Station at the base of Madison Square Garden.

A rendering of Penn Station with a light-filled entrance at Madison Square Garden.
Governor's Office

The MTA last year already inked a $65 million contract with the firms WSP and FXC JV, along with architect John McAslan, to come up with preliminary designs for the station’s renovations.

MTA Chair Janno Lieber said the recently renovated Long Island Railroad concourse on the north end of Penn Station — which has raised ceilings and some natural light — “proof of concept of what we can do and will do in the next phase.”

Lieber said he hopes the new Penn Station will dwarf the city’s other major train halls and be “the size of Moynihan Train Hall plus Grand Central Station combined.”

Critics of the plan, like Manhattan Community Board 5 member Layla Law-Gisko, said the redesign wouldn’t increase service or capacity at Penn Station.

“I mean seriously, that's how we're going to compete with large cities throughout the world? This is pathetic," she said.

Hochul said the renovations are a separate project from the state’s proposed plan to expand Penn Station by razing a city block south of 31st St. Officials said that expansion is necessary in order to operate two new Hudson River train tunnels that are planned through the Gateway Program.

The MTA hopes to fund the renovations with federal grants and state funds. Hochul said her office has already committed $1.3B to the project.

The absence of New Jersey officials during Hochul’s Penn Station announcement comes as Garden State politicians criticized the federal government’s final approval of the MTA’s congestion pricing plan to toll motorists who drive south of 60th St. in Manhattan.

“We will not stop fighting until we defeat this [congestion pricing] plan and ensure New York is not allowed to balance its budget on the backs of hard-working New Jersey families,” said a joint statement issued by New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, Rep. Josh Gottheimer and Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr.

“That’s a Jersey promise.”
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
Manhattan's Third Avenue redesign begins next week with upgrades for bikes, buses, pedestrians
Third Avenue in Manhattan.
Getty Images
By
Catalina Gonella

A nearly 40-block stretch of Third Avenue in Manhattan will be getting a bus-, bike- and pedestrian-friendly makeover beginning next week, the Department of Transportation said Monday.

Two of the five current vehicle travel lanes will be turned into a dedicated bus lane and a parking-protected bike lane along the nearly two-mile segment of Third Avenue between East 59th Street and 96th Street. The project, which the department is calling a “complete street” redesign, aims to improve safety along the historically dangerous section of the corridor where six pedestrians and one cyclist have been killed since 2016, according to the DOT.

“This project will be transformational for Third Avenue, prioritizing the safety and mobility of all New Yorkers,” DOT Commissioner Ydanis Rodriguez said in a statement Monday. “Building a Complete Street featuring a dedicated bus lane, protected bike lane, and pedestrian islands is about putting people first.”

Already heavily used by delivery cyclists, the busy thoroughfare will be getting a new parking protected bike lane — significantly wider than the typical protected six-foot-wide bike lane in Manhattan. The DOT said the wider bike lane will make cycling conditions more comfortable and safe, and encourage cycling and other forms of micro mobility.
A DOT rendering shows the changes coming to Third Avenue in Manhattan.

According to the DOT, buses on Third Avenue currently travel at an average of 5.4 miles an hour during the morning peak, and 5.2 miles per hour during the evening peak — far slower than the average across the city. A dedicated camera-enforced bus lane will aim to speed those buses up, providing more reliable service for the 50,000 daily riders they serve.

Those on foot are also being prioritized in the redesign — pedestrian islands will improve visibility at intersections and shorten the time it takes to cross the street.

Transportation Alternatives Director Danny Harris said the overhaul of Third Avenue is a welcome and long overdue change, and the city needs to bring similar safety measures to avenues across the city.

“New York City is a city that has a hard time learning from itself. And this is a case where we have a successful complete street on First Avenue and Second Avenue — it only makes sense that it's not only on Third Avenue, but really every avenue across the city,” Harris said. “We need to move beyond the piecemeal approach of one avenue at a time and actually take these projects to every corner of the city so every New Yorker stands to benefit.”

Construction on the redesign project is expected to continue through the rest of the year.
 

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member

NYC response times to fires, medical emergencies soaring — along with fire deaths​

By
Rich Calder

For a second consecutive year, New York City first responders took longer to get to fires and other medical emergencies — and more people died in blazes.
Combined response times by FDNY ambulances and fire companies to “life-threatening medical emergencies” were up 20 seconds on average during the fiscal year ending June 30 – or 3.5% — to 9 minutes and 50 seconds compared to the previous 12 months, according to the Fiscal 2023 Mayor’s Management Report, released Friday.

Fire deaths involving civilians jumped by 10.8%, from 92 to 102, the report found.
Fire companies responded on average in 9 minutes and 23 seconds while agency ambulances took 10 minutes and 43 seconds — both up from the previous year, the agency said.
The FDNY also noted an uptick in life-threatening medical emergency calls, from 564,412 in fiscal 2022 to 605,140 last fiscal year.
And overall structural fires also rose 2% over the same period, from 23,387 to 23,901, according to the annual report.

A fire engine works it's way up Eight Avenue near Times Square on January 01, 2023 in New York, New York
New York City response times to fires and other medical emergencies rose for a second straight year, according to a new report released by Mayor Adams.Getty Images
“We’re on the brink of costing people’s life if things don’t change,” said Oren Barzilay, president of Local 2507, the union representing more than 4,100 rank-and-file city emergency medical technicians and paramedics.
Barzilay said he didn’t expect much improvement to response times considering the mass influx of migrants and other new residents draining city resources, and City Hall’s anti-car agenda that includes closing off more streets and driving lanes.
“[Unless] the city and state take EMS seriously as an essential service, we’re going to see a total collapse of the system,” he added.

FDNY paramedic Joseph Hudek, left, transporting a man along side the NYPD officers who pulled him from the shallow water of the East River
The FDNY is blaming its rising response times to fires and other medical emergencies to more people driving to avoid the using a crime-plagued subway system — and clogging up traffic.William Farrington A general view of an FDNY ambulance responding to an emergency on 42nd Street in New York, NY as seen on July 13, 2023 Combined response times by FDNY ambulances and fire companies to “life-threatening medical emergencies” rose 20 seconds during the fiscal year ending June 30 – or 3.5% — to 9 minutes and 50 seconds.Christopher Sadowski
James Brosi, president of the FDNY Uniformed Fire Officers Association, blamed the rise in response times on the city’s relentless narrowing of streets and changing of traffic patterns in recent years to slow traffic, coupled with an increase in emergency calls coming in.
“Seconds are critical when people’s lives are at stake,” he said. “With budget cuts looming, we must keep every apparatus in service and staffing levels high, so we can protect the lives and property of the people of New York.”

The Mayor’s Management Report – which outlines the highs and lows of all city agency operations – also notes that response times are 82 seconds – or 16.1% — higher than the 8 minute and 28 second average in fiscal 2019. There were 67 civilian fire deaths that same year, or 52% less than fiscal 2023.
The new numbers even exceed response times from fiscal 2020 when emergency responders were overwhelmed at the start of the pandemic.
The FDNY blamed the increase in deaths on more New Yorkers using lithium-ion batteries to power e-bikes and e-scooters.
Battery fires have surpassed electrical fires at the top cause of deaths the past year, officials said.

The Mayor’s Management Report released by Eric Adams is the first benchmark of his administration’s performance covering a full fiscal year.Matthew McDermott
And the agency attributed rising response times in part to “higher levels of traffic citywide as a result of changes in travel patterns,” such as more people relying on cars and to avoid the crime-ridden subways.

getuid
partner
sync
partner
710530.gif
 

Steven Kopstein

New member

NYC’s privileged bicyclists won’t even discuss best way to stop bike deaths​

The death of Devra Freelander, a young cyclist killed by a truck last week, spurred outrage among cyclists and demands for more bike lanes. So how do we prevent such tragedies from happening again?
We know one thing: A million miles of protected lanes wouldn’t have saved Freelander. She was killed at an intersection, having hurtled from the sidewalk through a red light in front of the oncoming truck, which wasn’t speeding and had the right of way.
The two things that might have prevented this horror — training and adherence to rules — are tellingly absent from the protesting cyclists’ list of demands. Not to put too fine a point on it, cyclists are frequently their own worst enemy, and their presence has made everyone less safe.

Of course, automobiles are more dangerous than bikes, but adding cyclists to the mix, many of whom refuse to obey traffic laws, has compounded that hazard.
When Mayor Mike Bloomberg began wedging bike lanes into our already crammed streets, it wasn’t to meet a demand — it was to create one. To promote cycling, he and then-DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan, a bike enthusiast, threw caution to the wind and encouraged cyclists to hit the streets without so much as a helmet law, which might have deterred ridership, especially among the affluent, arrogant, scofflaw cyclists who want to use the city as their own personal racetrack.
Then came Citi Bike, offering up cumbersome, unwieldy and garishly colored bikes to inexperienced riders. Suddenly, without any training or education, thousands of New Yorkers were riding alongside hulking trucks and buses, whose blind spots are exacerbated by the speed and narrow silhouettes of bicycles.

It was a recipe for disaster, and the disproportionately influential, ceaselessly kvetching bicycle-advocacy groups capitalized on every heart-rending fatality to further their agenda.
Nobody elected the advocacy outfit Transportation Alternatives to speak for New Yorkers. It isn’t a safety organization, a cadre of seasoned city planners or even some impartial arbiter seeking what’s best for everyone; it’s a bunch of mainly upscale cyclists trying to make the city more navigable for themselves.
Yet for some reason they are permitted to dictate the configuration of our streets. The authorities have shoehorned more and more bike lanes into the gutters at their behest, even though the city wasn’t designed to safely accommodate both automobiles and bikes, making any unbroken route for cyclists physically impossible.

Many of our major thoroughfares now have one side of the street reserved for buses and the other for bicycles, leading to frequent and sudden bike-lane obstructions whenever vehicles need access to a curb or construction is underway. Even protected bike lanes are still subject to foot traffic, and everyone from joggers to skateboarders has adopted the lanes as their own.
Adding insult to injury, soon e-bikes, offering all the speed of a bicycle with none of the effort, will call the lanes home as well. What could possibly go wrong?

Meanwhile, pedestrians have borne the brunt of the onslaught. While not all cyclists flout the rules, far too many exceed speed limits, obstruct crosswalks, run red lights, ride in the wrong direction and hop sidewalks without compunction, admonishment or penalty. Big Apple cyclists have earned their disrepute.

It’s not at all unusual to see them texting or riding hands-free as they careen through traffic. Close calls have become a daily occurrence, especially for the elderly and disabled, whose reflexes aren’t ideal for evading speeding cyclists.
Case in point, two months ago, 67-year-old Donna Sturm died after being mowed down by a cyclist who ran a red light in Midtown. If bicyclists can ride fast enough to kill, they ride too fast to enjoy exemption from the training, certification, insurance and identifiable licensing required for the use of every other vehicle on our streets.
Bike lanes haven’t made anyone any safer, but they have inarguably taken traffic congestion from bad to intolerable. The narrowing of our city’s critical arteries to accommodate a tiny minority whose vehicles are rendered impractical all winter and on rainy days seems to have been irrationally prioritized with regard to triage.

Buses, delivery trucks, taxis, emergency responders and sanitation vehicles, which provide essential services and transportation for millions, are needlessly delayed for one third of the year while the lanes lie dormant; and even during more meteorologically hospitable months the sheer disparity between the number of people who benefit from bike lanes and those for whom they are a hindrance begs redress.
The carnage we have seen this year is a direct result of the free ride and false sense of security given to cyclists by the mayor and his predecessor. New York City is not safe for bikes, and it never will be.
Like so many of the city's ills, it all comes down to enforcement. This is something the police should be doing but for whatever reason are not. Add cars without plates, speeding cars, ultra loud cars, speeding unlicensed gas-powered vehicles traveling through red lights and on sidewalks, and illegal parking in bike lanes. I could go on and on and on... A high percentage of bikers are in favor of proper training and safe biking. The problem is with the bad ones who are present in every mode of transit. As we saw with yet another "unprecedented" storm last week, we are living in a climate crisis. NYC needs to step up to the plate. Cars are a luxury, not a necessity in a dense urban area (Manhattan and closer in Queens, Brooklyn and the Bronx) - they need to be treated as such. We need PAID PERMIT parking in every borough so residents only (with a few spaces as exceptions) can park. Put the funds into mass transit and bike infrastructure. Have you been to Holland? They have massive bike infrastructure and a crap climate - and most people use bikes to get around. This is sorely needed here. Space goes for $1,000 a square foot, so why are we GIVING IT AWAY to 2-ton fume-spewing vehicles??? Makes zero sense. Yes to congestion pricing. Yes to e-bikes (the good ones not the cheap hazardous ones), yes to dedicated bus lanes, yes to protected bike lanes and less room for cars. Study after study after study shows that when you reduce car space, you get fewer cars. It simply has to be faster, better, safer and easier to use a bike, public transit or walk for us to rid ourselves of the menace of cars. Cars are far more dangerous than any of these other modes of getting around. Obvious exceptions for elderly, handicapped etc. It's the future. Why keep putting it off and pretending it's still 1950? When I look at early 20th century pictures of NYC streets, they had very few cars on them. People could easily walk across any street. Kids played in them. Now as I type this I hear the revving of engines through my leafy residential neighborhood - crossing the streets always feels a bit risky etc. Why have we given up our peace so easily - all for convenience?
 

Attachments

  • old NYC red.jpg
    old NYC red.jpg
    199.9 KB · Views: 0

David Goldsmith

All Powerful Moderator
Staff member
The biggest waste of public space on NYC is 1500 miles of mostly unused bike lanes. At least the parking spots get used. And the concept the cyclists favor enforcement is total bullshit. Even when cyclists kill pedestrians the response is nothing other than "cars are worse, we should go after them."
 
Top