Tax Benefits Archives

December 26, 2007

80/20 Rule Expanded: Co-ops Should Thank Bush

Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on December 26, 2007 at 3.28 PM

A: Did you know that the recent Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, recently signed into law on December 20th by President Bush, contained an amendment that should make co-op owners rejoice! The 80/20 rule now includes more options for co-ops to qualify and receive market rate commercial rents that otherwise wouldn't have been realized due to tax laws.

80-20-rule-coops-manhattan-real-estate.jpg80/20 Rule - A federal tax rule that requires residential co-ops to get at least 80 percent of their gross income from their tenant-shareholders and no more than 20 percent from other sources like commercial rents.

According to a release by attorney Aaron Shmulewitz of Belkin, Burden, Wenig, & Goldman, LLP:

On December 20, 2007 President Bush signed into law the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007. The law contained an amendment to §216 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) that is of immense importance to many co-ops.

In order for a co-op to qualify as a "housing cooperative" (and, thus, enable its shareholders to enjoy the same tax benefits available to home owners (i.e., the $250,000 per person exemption on the gain on sale of a residence, as well as the tax deductibility of interest paid on the shareholder’s apartment loan, interest paid on the co-op’s underlying mortgage, and real estate taxes paid by the co-op), a co-op must satisfy various requirements stated in Code §216.

The most difficult requirement to satisfy has usually been that at least 80% of the co-o’s income for the year must come from its shareholders, and no more than 20% could come from non-shareholder sources. As a result, co-ops whose buildings contained large stores or other commercial spaces were often forced to keep the rent payable by such commercial tenants artificially below-market, or keep the maintenance payable by the co-op’s shareholders artificially high, or impose assessments on the shareholders, so as to preserve the 80/20 income ratio. Some co-ops resorted to even more complicated efforts.

However, the new law radically changes that by adopting two additional alternatives that would also satisfy the “80/20” requirement. Now, a co-op can also qualify if, for the tax year in question:

(i) at least 80% of the total square footage of the co-op’s property is used or available for use by shareholders for residential or residentially-ancillary purposes, or

(ii) at least 90% of the co-op’s expenses are for the acquisition, construction, management, maintenance or care of the co-op’s property for the benefit of its shareholders.

The change became effective immediately, and will benefit co-ops whose tax years end on and after December 31, 2007.

This new law expands the ability of the corporation to qualify and charge market-rate rents for commercial tenants that otherwise would not have been allowed by tax law. As a result, co-ops that can now qualify should be able to realize significantly more revenue from commercial tenants assuming the raised rents are agreed. Interesting little find here!!


January 2, 2007

Developers Beware: 421-A Overhaul Coming

Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on January 2, 2007 at 11.24 AM

A: Mayor Bloomberg signed legislation a few days before the new year that reforms the 421-A property tax exemption program offered to developers as an incentive to stimulate building. The changes basically expand the area for the program, extend tax benefits to 25 years for developers who promote affordable housing, set limits on benefits any market rate unit can receive, and the creation of an affordable housing trust fund.

nyc-real-estate-tax-abatement.jpg

Details on this new legislation could be found at NYC.gov website.

Here are the details of the changes to the 421-A benefits program that will affect developers:

  • Expand the Geographic Exclusionary Area to include all of Manhattan, south of 136th Street in West Harlem, south of 126th Street in Central Harlem, south of 117th Street in East Harlem; all of Downtown Brooklyn, Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Boerum Hill, Park Slope, most of Fort Greene, Prospect Heights, Williamsburg and Greenpoint, and into Sunset Park and Bushwick; and along the waterfront from Red Hook north to Astoria in Queens.
  • Grant 25 years of benefits only to developments that provide affordable housing, ensuring for the first time that 421-a provides an incentive for low-income housing throughout the city.
  • Set a limit on the total amount of 421-a tax benefits that any market rate unit may receive. Only the first $65,000 of an apartment's assessed value would receive the 421-a tax exemption.
  • Abolish the existing negotiable certificates program and create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund. This $400 million fund, targeted primarily to the 15 poorest neighborhoods in the City, would be used to finance the development and rehabilitation of affordable housing in areas outside of the Geographic Exclusionary Areas.
  • Basically the program changes focused on benefits to stimulate more affordable housing, something that developers probably didn't want to hear. It's almost as if the government recognized the changing housing market in NYC and wanted to limit development a bit to control the number of new development luxury units that eventually will hit the open market. These changes seem to do that; unless I'm interpreting this wrong in which case I hope someone will mention why.

    One aspect of the program also seems restricting, which is:

    Only the first $65,000 of an apartment's assessed value would receive the 421-a tax exemption
    Does this mean that future tax abatements for new developments under these changes will NOT give buyers of new developments the fuill tax incentives that they got used to in past years? If a property is assessed at $750,000, than that means $685,000 of the full property value will be normally taxed, and $65,000 will be abated? Again, am I wrong in this interpretation?

    According to METRO article:

    "This bill doesn’t go far enough," Avella said. "We're pushing it back and forth, making some tweaks but not addressing the two major problems: Building affordable housing and eliminating this huge windfall for developers. Why should we give tax breaks to developers of luxury and market-rate housing anywhere in the city?"
    Thoughts please!! I have a feeling I am interpreting this wrong in terms of ultimate benefits for developing

    June 12, 2006

    Primary Residence Tax Benefits

    Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on June 12, 2006 at 9.41 AM

    capital-gains-primary-residence-tax-relief.gif

    A: I've been recently asked this question a lot by my own clients so figured to make it into a post to clear up any confusion. If you are a homeowner or preparing to purchase your first home, here are the tax relief guidelines (as noted directly from the IRS) that you will have to meet to save the big bucks!

    To claim the maximum exclusion on the Capital gains on the sale of your home, you MUST first meet the Ownership and Use tests.

    OWNERSHIP & USE TESTS (Out of 5 YR Period)

  • Owned the home for at least 2 years (the ownership test), and
  • Lived in the home as your main home for at least 2 years (the use test)
  • Example 1 - home owned and occupied for 3 years.

    Amanda bought and moved into her main home in September 2002. She sold the home at a gain on September 15, 2005. During the 5-year period ending on the date of sale (September 16, 2000 - September 15, 2005), she owned and lived in the home for 3 years. She meets the ownership and use tests.

    Now that you are aware of the Ownership and Use Tests that you must pass, you can move on to how much you can deduct. Here are the Maximum Exclusions as noted on the IRS website.

    MAXIMUM EXCLUSIONS

    You can exclude up to $250,000 of the gain on the sale of your main home if all of the following are true:

  • You meet the ownership test
  • You meet the use test
  • During the 2-year period ending on the date of the sale, you did not exclude gain from the sale of another home
  • If you and another person owned the home jointly but file separate returns, each of you can exclude up to $250,000 of gain from the sale of your interest in the home if each of you meets the three conditions just listed.

    You can exclude up to $500,000 of the gain on the sale of your main home if all of the following are true.

  • You are married and file a joint return for the year (IT IS NOT REQUIRED THAT BOTH OF YOU ARE ON THE TITLE OR STOCK CERTIFICATE)
  • Either you or your spouse meets the ownership test
  • Both you and your spouse meet the use test
  • During the 2-year period ending on the date of the sale, neither you nor your spouse excluded gain from the sale of another home
  • If either spouse does not satisfy all these requirements, the maximum exclusion that can be claimed by the couple is the total of the maximum exclusions that each spouse would qualify for if not married and the amounts were figured separately. For this purpose, each spouse is treated as owning the property during the period that either spouse owned the property.

    UrbanDigs Says: The tax benefits that Uncle Sam provides to you for investing in housing in America is what makes it such a wise investment, and an investment that historically has proven to build wealth and appreciate over the long term. By understanding exactly what you need to do to qualify for the maximum exclusion, you are on the right track towards building wealth and living a financially sound and independent life! Good Luck!

    March 2, 2006

    What is a 421a Tax Abatement

    Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on March 2, 2006 at 10.12 AM

    nyc real estate

    A: The 421a Tax Abatement Certificate is a key financial resource used by developers and offered by the city to spur development and keep housing costs reasonable by offering 'temporary relief' in property taxes owed by individual condominium owners or coop shareholders. Although, most new developments in New York City today are either Condo's or Condop's, not Coops (see my post on What is A Condop?). By the way, isn't that the perfect image for this post!

    According to the NYC.gov website:

    The Cooperative and Condominium Abatement Program provides partial tax relief for condo owners and co-op tenant-shareholders to reduce the disparity in property tax paid between residential Class 2 properties (i.e., condominiums and cooperatives) and Class 1 properties (i.e., one-, two-, and three-family homes), which are assessed at a lower percentage of market value.
    There are also eligibility requirements:
    Ownership -- Condominium owners and cooperative tenant-shareholders who, as of the applicable taxable status date, may own no more than three dwelling units in any one property. Units held by sponsors or their successors in interest are not eligible.
    Other Exemptions -- Properties that already receive a state or local tax exemption or abatement, such as J-51, 421a, or 421b, may not be eligible.

    Its important to note that tax abatements are applied for by the developer and granted by the city to offer incentives to developers for building and marketing a new property. Usually, a 10-Year Tax Abatement is granted meaning that the actual property taxes that were assessed to the building and its individual units will get relief for the first 10 years of occupancy. The tax relief is the greatest right when the building is ready for occupancy and then increases every 2 years (20% every 2 years) until the 10 years is up, and at which time the property taxes will have hit their maturity.

    Lets take a look at a real-life building for an example of the 421a Tax Abatement and the listings for sale in pre-construction:


    205 East 59th New Development

    nyc real estate

    Apt. 9B

    #Beds - 2
    #Baths - 2
    Total Size - 1,368 Sq. Ft.
    Maint/CC - $1,626
    *RE Taxes - $261
    Asking: $2,211,000

    Apt. 22A

    #Beds - 1
    #Baths - 1.5
    Total Size - 1,122 Sq. Ft.
    Maint/CC - $1,344
    *RE Taxes - $216
    Asking: $1,799,500

    In this New Condo Development on 59th Street the 421a Tax Abatement brought the tax payments down to a very low $200+ for these 2 units. If I do the math and add 20% to this starting figure every 2 years for 10 years, I will reach a mature property tax value of about $650 for Apt. 9B and slightly less for Apt. 22A. So in this new development the 421a Tax Abatement is saving unit owners about $400/month or $5,000 a year for their first 2 years of living at 205 East 59th street.

    I know its a bit confusing and that it could also be argued that with the temporary lower monthly expenses the developer is boosting the asking price, but in the end its still a luxury new condo with more amenities than most buildings offer; including:

    - 24HR Doorman & Concierge
    - Private 5th Floor Landscaped Gardent Terrace
    - Fitness Center
    - Service Pantry for Catered Events
    - Outdoor Stretching Studio on Mahogany Deck For Yoga
    - A Whimsical Puppy Park

    UrbanDigs Says: For investors who bought early in pre-construction at a good price point, it might be wise to sell your unit halfway into the tax abatement. The logic here is that you are selling the property while there is still tax relief in effect and the monthly expenses are lower than they will be in 5 more years; this should help you get a higher asking price assuming the market hasn't experienced any turbulence. Always remember that as monthly expenses rise, the asking price must be reduced to compensate for affordability.

    December 6, 2005

    Can you get OUT of paying Capital Gains?

    Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on December 6, 2005 at 10.18 PM

    nyc real estate

    A: Hmm. I wonder why real estate is such a WISE investment? Hmmm. Hmmm. Could it be tax benefits? YES! Read this very important post on taking advantage of Uncle Sam and build wealth for YOU!

    I will start out this article with a early warning for all potential homeowners out there:

    Keep an eye out for Tax Code Reform which seems very likely will change the tax benefits that current real estate investments produce

    Now that 'another' housing related red flag just went up, lets analyze the 2 most commonly used tax benefits that can help you RIGHT NOW to avoid or defer paying Capital gains taxes to Uncle Sam!

    1031 Exchange ('Starker' Exchange)

    Allows a tax payer to defer the paying of taxes on a gain when an investment property is SOLD & a new property of like or greater value is PURCHASED. In other words, if you first purchased a property for $400K, and then 1 year later sold it for $500K, you can then defer the payment of taxes on the $100K Capital gain in this transaction, as long as you purchase another property worth $500K or more.


    Primary Residence Tax Benefits

    If you have lived in your property, as your primary residence, for at least 2 out of a period of the last 5 years, you will not have pay Capital gains taxes on the profit when you sell. This benefit equals up to $250K of tax-free gains for singles, and up to $500K of tax free gains for married couples. Of course, this is dependent on how you filed your last tax return; single or married.