LOAN DELINQUENCIES PEAK!
**Since March 2010, Mr. Bernstein has served as Senior Vice President, Research, for AH Lisanti Capital Growth, LLC, a registered investment adviser. This commentary solely represents Mr. Bernstein’s views and opinions as of August 21st, 2010, does not constitute investment advice and does not depict the views of AH Lisanti Capital Growth, LLC.

Yes, believe it or not, according to data released by the Federal Reserve earlier this week, loan delinquencies appear to have peaked (View image). In Q2 2010, for the second quarter in a row, delinquent loans as a percent of all loans declined (on a non-seasonally adjusted basis). Delinquent loans began their ascent from a historical low of 1.5% of all loans reached in Q2 2005, climbing relentlessly until Q4 2009, when they hit a hellish 7.5% of all loans. During the previous real estate and credit crisis of the 1980s delinquency levels vacillated at very elevated levels above 4.6% for 6 years before peaking at 6.3% in Q1 1991. This was due to the rolling real estate recessions that swept across Texas/Oklahoma/Colorado, southern California and New England in the late 1980s, followed by the commercial real estate debacle of the early 90s. While two quarters of decline may not be indicative of a peak from a historical perspective (data back to Q1 1985), in this case I believe that charge-off patterns indicate cause for optimism. Just to review a few banking terms used to describe the formation of bad loans and their disposal:
1) Loans go delinquent, which means that people stop making their monthly payments.
2) Banks begin to reserve funds to cover whatever losses they believe are likely to form as a result of delinquency.
3) A small number of loans go from delinquent or "non-accrual" back to accrual status when the bankers remind the borrowers of the consequences of not repaying their loans.
4) Delinquent loans eventually go into the foreclosure process and are "charged-off" by the bank. Which means that the bank makes an estimate of what its loss on disposing of the loan is likely to be and takes a charge to its earnings to reflect the expected loss. The charge off is merely an accounting entry and does not necessarily indicate that the bank has disposed of the collateral underlying the loan. It does mean, however, that the bank is forced to prepare itself to take the eventual loss in terms of having capital in place to net against it.
5) The bank forecloses on the borrower, gets title to the property back and actually disposes of the property. The size of the loss incurred versus the amount loaned is referred to as severity. In some cases the amount charged off was larger than the bank's ultimate loss and some or all of the charge off is reversed. In some cases it is worse and an additional charge off is required.
As is notable from the chart of charge offs on all loans (View image) banks have ramped up the amount of loan charge offs much faster in this credit crisis than they did in the late 80s/early 90s, despite the ultimate peak in delinquencies being only a little higher (and potentially similar in magnitude as the prior stretch of high delinquencies lasted a very long time). This indicates to me that, despite what we hear about "extend and pretend", at least from an accounting and capital raising perspective, banks are being much more aggressive in preparing to deal with their delinquent loans (there are subtleties relative to extend and pretend related to maturity defaults we could discuss, but actual delinquencies are being dealt with). This lays the groundwork for expanding credit and general economic growth which would forestall another wave of delinquencies. Indeed as of the July 2010 Federal Reserve survey of bank lending practices we are already seeing bank lending loosening up just a little.
I would note that all the categories of loans I have been tracking for the last couple of years have seen delinquencies decline from recent peaks including credit card loans, commercial and Industrial (C&I) loans and most importantly residential loans, which have by far and away been the biggest problem for the economy and the banking industry.
This quarters' data from the banks supervised by the Federal Reserve (which include state-chartered member banks, bank holding companies, foreign branches of U.S. national and state member banks, Edge Act Corporations, and state-chartered U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks) show that residential loan delinquencies declined quarter to quarter for the first time since Q1 2007, as illustrated in the chart below.

All thank god and say ye amen!
Perhaps with loan delinquencies finally headed in the right direction and banks aggressively reserving for and charging off their bad loan portfolios, bad loan disposition will begin to pick up and new lending can begin to accelerate. It is difficult to see past the current lull in the economy and the obnoxious action in the stock market, but with everyone looking for the end of the world, the contrarian in me prefers to focus on the positive data points that are being ignored.



Posted by Conscience of a Conservative
Sat Aug 21st, 2010 12:50 PM
Yes,
This has been observed for the last several months now. But new delinquencies are the beginning of the pipeline. Foreclosure, REO and liqidation rates still have another year to go before they begin to show a similar pattern.
The one caveat in all this which I have not looked into is how the loan mods most of which are failing or are expected to fail plays out in the numbers.
Posted by Jeff
Sat Aug 21st, 2010 02:51 PM
It is true that that delinquencies are the "front of the pipeline" that's why they should be focused on. Like retail sales they tell you what is actually going on in the economy (supply chains and foreclosure pipelines are subject to all manner of distortion). Foreclosures, REO and disposals are just clean up activity. With a couple of second order effect caveats. Once the debt is wiped away from properties they can be "re-basised" - sold at a much lower price - to a new buyer. If this takes place en masse it certainly weighs on prices. But there is a more subtle second order effect as well. The buyer of the "re-basised" income producing property can afford to charge a much lower rent for the property, still pay whatever his financing costs are (incredibly low today) and still make a very nice return. This will of course lower new tenant rent levels for the nearby market. So there is the potential for disposals of foreclosed properties to exert strong deflationary pressures on the real estate economy. Knowing the above bankers have been wise to try to delay the disposition of properties until "CNN effects" and inventory liquidation effects on the economy have subsided. We are now about to see what impacts "re-basising" will have on the economy as foreclosed properties come to market and new rent levels are set.
Posted by lars
Sun Aug 22nd, 2010 01:21 AM
You can do your yippee dance when you finally see the banks writing down their crappy loans. We still have at least a trillion before you can even walk to the cupboard to put the bubbly into the fridge to get cold.
Posted by Thisson
Mon Aug 23rd, 2010 05:41 PM
I wouldn't agree with the characterization that banks are aggressively reserving for losses.
To the contrary, they are pretending the losses don't exist, and we are all pretending along with them.
Not to mention that Government is the only game in town supporting residential, and at some point they are going to be forced to stop shoveling billions of dollars into Fannie, Freddie & FHA each quarter. What happens then?
Posted by Noah
Mon Aug 23rd, 2010 08:06 PM
I always enjoy Jeffs articles, but what I dont trust is what the banks/fed/FASB/gov are doing to hide losses off balance sheet or transfer the shit to public's balance sheet. At what prices are these things marked or traded? How can we trust this is the whole story? Will we find out later it wasnt?
Thats why I cant get too excited about datapoints like this. Its an embedded virus. Thanks as always Jeff!
Posted by Conscience of a Conservative
Wed Aug 25th, 2010 04:52 AM
Noah,
A little too cynical, even for me. Delinquencies are hard to hide. Loan tapes show current and past history. The key is to look for loan mods and whether the borrower is a perfect payer(i.e. did he meet 24 of his last 24 payments).
I would say that other than the loan mods issue, the data is accurate.
What I don't trust is basically the values the banks are assigning to their loans. Especially on second liens, the banks are not being honest.
Posted by Thisson
Thu Aug 26th, 2010 02:59 PM
Noah,
Our government is completely Orwellian at this point: it's nothing but one big lie after another. BLS employment numbers. CPI. How much oil spilled in the Gulf. It's sickening.
@CoaC - I've read articles showing that the Banks are not reporting failures to pay to the credit bureaus, so I don't even trust those tapes...
Posted by ugg boots london
Thu Sep 2nd, 2010 12:50 AM
good
Posted by Sexy Costumes
Fri Sep 3rd, 2010 04:55 AM
thanks for sharing.
Posted by CHI Flat Irons on sale
Sat Sep 4th, 2010 12:02 AM
There is a perfect ghd straighteners for every hair type and the table is designed to help you find the best one for you. Compare features and prices as well as the latest accessories that you will receive with each straightener. you can go through www.famoushairstraighteners.com to get more info.
ghd hair straighteners hair straighteners chi flat irons
ghd straighteners chi irons New GHD Hair Straighteners
Cheap GHD Straighteners Buy Hair Straighteners
CHI Irons On Sale CHI Flat Irons clearance
Posted by high quality ghd hair straighteners
Fri Oct 15th, 2010 04:26 AM
I am so interested in it!