A 'Seasonally' Slow Manhattan Summer So Far
A: Its very clear that this summer has seen a noticeable slowdown in 'sales pace'; especially compared to the activity in the first four months of 2010. But I would like to dig a bit into why the drop in sales pace should be somewhat muted by a drop in inventory levels as well. Like the after-effects of a stimulus plan, the surge in activity from Feb-April is being followed by an overshoot to the 'dull' side later on. Well that 'later on' seems to be here and while the summer is hot, it seems sales pace is not. However, we should use caution before interpreting a slower sales pace to mean a new move down in prices is upon us. I'll discuss why below. Unless there are sellers out there with serious pressures to liquidate, I say what we got here is 'a very seasonally slow summer'. We should wait it out before making bold predictions on price action - although I'm sure we can give back a bit of the reflation. If this sales pace continues apace after Labor Day and macro forces deteriorate with it (equities take a sharp move down), then we have something to discuss.
First, let me show you some sneak peaks so you can see why I am thinking this way. The Broker Year-over-Year Contracts Signed Charts will show us the realtime movement of Manhattan property from ACTIVE to CONTRACT SIGNED, as the brokers update the status of their sales listings:

Looking at this form of 'sales pace' chart, the downward trajectory looks ugly and may lead some to believe a noticeable drop in prices is inevitable - similar to how a drop in sales volume after Lehman failed in Sept '08 led to a big price adjustment across all price points. Outside of seasonality which always should factor into our thinking, I would be wary of making bold price predictions for three main reasons:
1) First, before Lehman's failure in late 2008, Manhattan property was still trading right near peak levels - not so today. We always should keep in mind where we are coming from. In other words, today we are coming from a market that adjusted and then reflated a bit - not from a market trading at peak levels. Therefore its likely we will see less downward pressure should any new adjustment process be in the making.
2) Second, the level of fear floating around the environment two years ago versus today is quite different; today we do not fear systemic collapse or risk of a true depression. Rather today, a reflation mentality still seems in tact. The question is whether or not you believe in it.
3) Finally, the pressure to liquidate combined with a negative wealth effect of a plunging equity market is highly unlikely to mimic what happened from late 2008 to early 2009. Recall in that period, stocks were on their way towards a 45% nose dive - so ask yourself, do you see equities doing a similar move over the next 6-9 months causing the same level of panic?
In every market there will be sellers that must sell, sellers that want to sell, and sellers that are testing for a certain price. The confluence of factors that allowed an extreme move post-Lehman to occur, just doesn't seem to be in place right now. With that said, I think the mini-frenzy that produced some stronger than normal bids during Feb-April is clearly over. Its likely we see continued upward pressure in quarterly reports into late 2010 or early 2011, whenever the lagging deals eventually close and get caught by public record.
Now, the market is also seeing a move down in measured Active Inventory levels. Nothing major, but a decline in inventory nonetheless. I will not disclose the rules we put in to measure active inventory right here (you will have to wait for launch of the new site), but people should know that rules MUST be in place to properly measure what should be counted as active in this market - for example, a listing that is set to ACTIVE internally yet not updated by the listing broker in 90 days or 180 days, should NOT be counted as active! Those are stale, old listings more likely off the market yet never updated by the listing agent. Bear with me here.
Movement in sales pace should be analyzed with respect to relative movements in active inventory. What I mean is, imagine if sales pace stays constant but active inventory increases by 15%. Although sales pace did not change, one should interpret that as a slightly weaker market because demand is not meeting up with supply the way it did when inventory was 15% lower. On the flip side, if sales pace rises 10% and inventory falls 10%, that should be interpreted as a quickly strengthening market because supply is not keeping up with the pace of demand. These relationships could be due to seasonal factors or they could also signal a shift in the markets.
With me so far? One of the cooler charts we designed was what we call the Active-to-Pending Sales Ratio. It could be thought of as a reverse Absorption Rate chart with an equilibrium right in the middle. It will signal a weakening market when the ratio rises above equilibrium and signal a strengthening market as it falls below equilibrium. But it should factor in how different market forces may be enhancing one another or canceling each other out. Not a bad measure of volatility as well I guess.
So here you go, the Active-to-Pending Sales Ratio Chart since January, 2008:

First you notice the huge bulge that shows the severity of the adjustment Manhattan real estate experienced post-Lehman - pending sales fell about 70% while inventory rose about 30% during that phase, causing this ratio to surge with that weakness. The reflation that occurred in mid 2009 is also there. Finally, in the last month or so we see only a slight move up as sales pace noticeably fell. The main reason why this trend did not move up further, is because active inventory fell about 7% in the last few months; somewhat muting the effect of the drop in newly signed deals. It seems more of a seasonal thing than a 'market is about to see an adjustment' thing. When viewing the data trends as a whole, rather than piece by piece, I can confidently say that the pace of brand new listings hitting the marketplace in the last few months has slowed big time - and with it, deal volume.
Let's wait a bit longer before changing views or declaring inevitable price adjustments in our near future. For those that must sell soon, enjoy the fact that inventory is declining but get aggressive on price because the pace of signed deals is telling me that buyers are being very patient right now or taking a break for the summer. It may be quite difficult to procure that strong bid for any property mis-priced and with no special features to offer.



Posted by Sechel
Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 09:37 AM
Noah, posting here because I've given up on Street Easy due to the sites degredation.
I think what you are seeing is what's being called "the new normal", which in the context of mortgages means less housing turn-over and buyers looking to bid lower to protect them selves from the potential of lower home prices down the road.
Buyers buy now because of growing families or job relocations, more of the normal reasons and not to strike some deal.
This also means real estate will be a little less interesting over the next few years.
Posted by Noah
Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 09:42 AM
Sechel - what happened to SE? Havent been involved that much in past few months as we developed these new tools. You mean the forums? Trolls?
I think your right. People buy because of a need to buy. Which is always there. The speculative component is not what it was before, buying for sake of getting on a rising asset class using tons of leverage and ez money. Less sexy I always said.
Agree!
Posted by longtime lurker
Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 10:01 AM
Excellent analysis Noah on what seems to be going on out there.
We are looking for a two bedroom apartment since late last year and we saw about a dozen great apartments sell very fast earlier this year. We did not buy into it until the 5th or 6th one had multiple bids and went to contract on streeteasy after only a few weeks. I guess we did not belive the brokers and wrote off the 'bid now' and 'we have three offers in' as broker babble. We missed out, but that is ok. Now, we see less choices but less activity.
Great charts! Great commentary! Keep it up
Posted by AvUWS
Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 10:06 AM
The $64,000 question is what happens to NY RE if you take out that component? Isn't it the required ingredient for a bubble?
My own sentiments are:
- Slightly bullish on the US economy but no recovery to where we were for a long while.
- medium term bearish on NY economy. Eventually people won't price in guaranteed appreciation and WILL have to price in higher income, RE and Health taxes.
Long term NY - who knows. We make up our own rules here. If taxes go up huge that will hurt. And if FinReg leads to a newer, slower, Wall Street, watch out below. If FinReg somehow leads to a new Wall Street looking like the old Wall Street we will eventually be back in the go-go RE years.
Posted by Noah
Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 11:39 AM
AvUWS - well I think the speculation has been out of our markets for about 16-18 months now. The reflation we saw I dont think had a heavy 'speculative' component to it. There are always speculators, but the questions as you talk about, are what levels? Clearly pre-2007, speculation increased big time and we saw an influx of foreign demand buying our property. I guess without credit/leverage, there can only be so much speculation.
The two issues you talk about are very real longer term concerns - regulation and taxes. Add in there lending rates. We are now addicted to sub 5% long term lending rates. If that goes to 6%, it will be a culture shock. I think that is still a year or two away, but when that train gets going, it ain't easy to turn it back around. Something for the future to worry about I guess
Posted by Sechel
Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 12:13 PM
Noah, What effect does rising income tax rates have on real estate? Does it make the deduction more valuable and thus a positive?
Posted by Fred
Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 12:53 PM
Great job Noah! I'd add two factors that make predictions to the upside particularly challenged. First, there is no pre-sales market to speak of, at any price point, compared to three years ago. I'd argue we are back to normal in that regard, but we don't know how that impacts momentum going forward. Clearly, though, it's reason to be very cautious (at a minimum developers can't break ground without pre-sales activity). Second, how do we reconcile the radically different landscape for mortgage underwriting standards? It's more than just the interest rate and closing costs; it is the rigor with which loans are made that translates into significantly less buying power in the overall marketplace. In valuation terms, changes in underwriting increase the discount rate over time and we know that if we increase the discount rate, sales prices necessarily adjust. In layman's terms, a larger cash component means buyers will demand more security over time in the form of lower prices.
Posted by inter8
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 07:39 AM
Sound and reasonable analysis except i think clarifying the 90-180 active/non-active inventory issue is kind of important.
Over 90 is not that uncommon and certainly represents a significant part of the market that has mis-priced as well as the shadow inventory of development sites that are still moving forward despite elongated development timelines etc. and still dribbling out inventory on a schedule.
Unreleased apartments are probably the hardest thing to project. My sense is anything that is being "held back" from the listings is indeed available to be negotiated prior to its release.
Great work as always!
Posted by Chris
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 08:34 AM
Great post, Noah!
Posted by OT
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 08:49 AM
I think the number that says the most to me is the inventory, and when available, absorption. Any comments on the continued decline in inventory?
Posted by Fred
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 09:26 AM
OT - Inventory is highly manipulated. The whole game right now is about inventory management. The $1mm+ market is just waiting to pullback and the further up the price curve you go, the greater the problem becomes. You have significant shadow inventory of new product that is asking $1,200+/SF on cost of $900/SF and all of them are sitting around negotiating for extensions with their lenders. Once the banks can take the assets back, write-offs will happen at 50 cents on the dollar and they'll bulk sale for $800 / SF at best. Once the new product starts the repricing phase, all of your pre-war, older stock is going to get smacked in the head back to $500/SF, where prices should be.
Posted by Noah
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 10:03 AM
inter8 - not sure I know what you mean by: "i think clarifying the 90-180 active/non-active inventory issue is kind of important. "
Posted by lars
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 06:54 PM
Listened to interview with Meredith Whitney today and she continues to be negative on financials. In particular, she said that head count will decline in the second half of the year given the changes expected from new Fin. Regs.
Can't be good for NYC housing if she is correct.
Posted by Noah
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 07:30 PM
the banks and wall st wont be the nearly the same. its the fed engineered bank recap environment that makes some of the deeper changes and issues seem stuck under the surface. eventually, many of these negative themes likely will play out. I just wonder in what way and how severe the waves end up being. I think it will be more drawn out and take plenty of time
Posted by lars
Tue Aug 3rd, 2010 08:41 PM
Indeed, the devil is always in the details.
Posted by AvUWS
Wed Aug 4th, 2010 08:53 AM
Lars - here that is particularly interesting since we got a 2000 page law that still doesn't fill in all the details. There are vast portions of the regulation yet to be written. The law asks for some 60-70 sets of regulations to still be written/proposed by committees or the bureaucrats at various (sometimes new) agencies. And all this over the next 2 years (so AT LEAST 2 years).
Posted by OT
Wed Aug 4th, 2010 11:24 AM
Fred - not sure I agree that prime Manhattan will ever be back down to $500 sq. ft. The condos that you refer to are primarily in FiDi and super west 40's - 60's. Most people I know don't consider moving to those neighborhoods, so not sure if they drop to $800 or thereabouts that it will really have any impact on UWS, UES, W. Village, Tribeca, etc. Time will tell.
As far as the impact of the regulation on banks, the banks are already, and will continue to hire into positions that will protect them against the regulatory risks/requirements. I work for a bank and we are hiring aggressively into the risk/compliance/ops areas that will be impacted. Now, these aren't 7 figure positions, but some pay pretty well into the 6 figures. So for every 7 figure job that the banks are forced to eliminate, they will create 2 to 3 positions in low to mid 6 figures. Not sure what this will do for real estate.
Posted by anonymous
Wed Aug 4th, 2010 03:20 PM
OT,
There has been some chatter about layoffs in banks as they are not getting the same type of deal flow or trading gains as compared to later 2009 and early 2010. Not saying this will definitely happen, but if the market doesn't rebound smartly for the rest of the year, I have the feeling that there will be alot of disappointed bankers our there.
Posted by lars
Wed Aug 4th, 2010 03:33 PM
Anonymous | August 4, 2010 3:20 PM
Whitney made the point that revenues are not keeping pace (despite profits) and that most likely means lay-offs, which echoes your point exactly.
This is seperate and apart from the impact of new FinReg.
Posted by Fred
Thu Aug 5th, 2010 08:54 AM
Interesting comment on back office job creation in fin sector. I would dispute the compensation levels for these types of jobs though. Mid six figure is way way over paid for back office which typically will pay 100k to 200k for senior persons and maybe 100k for experienced hires. let's assume we get the same USD volume of new hires at lower wages (which i doubt, but let's make the assumption) as we had had pre-recession. The net impact of course is still a buyer pool that can afford much less home than what sellers are asking. They talk about zombie banks, zombie fund managers and i think empty buildings would fall into the zombie category as well.
Posted by OT
Thu Aug 5th, 2010 09:46 AM
Fred - not referring to back office positions (and your assessment of income levels there is mostly accurate). Talking about the new compliance/risk positions that are actually hiring former bankers and require industry expertise. Mid 6-figures may be a stretch, but these positions easily pay 200 - 300 total comp, and that will take some of the macro sting out of the necessary culling in the front office ranks due to shrinking business flow and erratic trading profits. I will also share that a CTO (Chief Tech Officer) at the line of business level at a large bank made low 7 figures in 2007 - I know this for a fact. The big money goes to the guys that bring it in, but the support staff make more than you might think.
Posted by lars
Thu Aug 5th, 2010 01:14 PM
OT,
Think you are kidding yourself if you think compliance hiring is going to meaningfully offset layoffs.
Posted by Fred
Thu Aug 5th, 2010 02:12 PM
Thanks OT. I think we would both agree that there is hiring but the general trajectory is an overall lower average income in Manhattan? As jobs relate to real estate, I really think average income and velocity of employment growth are the two primary factors for resi. Anecdotally speaking, it seems that all of our friends with children are in the process of leaving the city; all driven by one factor: cost.
Posted by OT
Thu Aug 5th, 2010 09:20 PM
Lars - perhaps not.
Fred - Check out this NY Times article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/03/your-money/03compare.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq=cost%20of%20city&st=cse
The found that living in the suburbs was 18% more costly than living in the city. Once you factor 2 cars, insurance, commuting to city, etc., actually quite pricy to maintain a suburban existence. Yeah, you get a few more square feet and your own patch of grass, but those all cost money to maintain.
I imagine that your friends who are leaving were raised in the suburbs and are moving back because they feel more comfortable parenting in that environment - there are too many cash traps for the uninitiated trying to raise kids in the city. As with many of my friends who leave after having children, not so much a matter of finances as it is a lifestyle decision.
Posted by ugg boots london
Thu Aug 12th, 2010 11:20 PM
good
Posted by power balance
Sat Aug 21st, 2010 04:23 AM
asdfasdf
Posted by ugg boots london
Thu Sep 2nd, 2010 12:59 AM
good
Posted by Sexy Costumes
Fri Sep 3rd, 2010 04:47 AM
power thanks for sharing.