Tax Credit Expires: Good Riddance!
A: Its about time that the government's interference to prop up housing prices expired. It should never have been implemented in the first place. My experience with the past 3-4 week rush to sign contracts was mostly negative. I will put aside the fact that one tax credit motivated buyer client turned out to miss the deadline and 'disappear' in the last 24 hours after an accepted offer a week ago. I received about 6 phone calls over the past 3-4 weeks from first time buyers hoping to sign on the dotted line before the expiration. What worried me was that the only one which should have even considered buying in the first place, was also the one to vanish as the deadline passed. The others simply wanted to buy so as not to miss out on the governments handout.
I can't help but think about Ana Maria's recent discussion on shady clients. Looking back to the other 5 calls I got from first time buyers, none of them should ever have been considering buying a home in the first place. The only motivation? Buy before the $8,000 tax credit expires. This is the beast the government created and I say good riddance!
The funny thing is, there is no doubt in my mind that any of these five buyers would have been able to find a condo property and a lender to allow them to make the purchase. No doubt. And here is why:
And of course the usual fees and expenses of the rest of the businesses that are involved in any one real estate transaction. Doing deals makes money and livings and is in the interest of all the parties involved. Whether or not the buyer should ever be purchasing in the first place is not their problem; afterall, the buyer is an adult and is entitled to make their own mistakes right?
This is where I have issues. The government policies created an environment that allowed housing to become a speculative asset class; winding down lending standards and increasing exotic products to expand affordability as the markets caused a psychological shift in the asset class. The end result was an engineered environment that allowed buyers who never should have been able to buy, to do so; along with hopes of a quick profit later on. We know what the engine of all this (wall street) did with these loans, and now we know the taxpayer basically assumed all the junk securities to keep the banking system from failing. A huge transfer of shit from the banks to the fed's balance sheet at the end of the day; totaling trillions of dollars. And now, we are doing it all over again!
My experience over the past 3-4 weeks was more of trying to talk sense into first time buyers whose motivation to purchase was misguided. These buyers felt a pressure, a stress to buy. Can you believe that? They werent looking to buy the home as a utility or an investment. They weren't looking at the purchase as a luxury resulting from achievements in their careers, years of saving up for the purchase, and something that lines up with their current financial situation and needs. A few of them even mentioned to me they didnt care what kind of property they ended up buying! All they cared about was signing the contract by April 30th and closing by June 30th to get the $8,000 government tax credit! HOW INSANE IS THAT!
Here is the rub: Given that we just went through a devastating collapse of the housing market and banking system, I don't see the euphoria being anywhere near levels that led to the initial crisis. However, if I alone got these calls I can only imagine how many buyers out there across the nation actually pulled the trigger to seal the deal only for this stupid incentive. Now I am not saying some rational buyers out there are stupid and bought for the wrong reasons. Not at all. At all times there are rational, savvy, and conservative buyers out there who are buying for all the right reasons and keeping their purchases well within their financial means. And those buyers got a nice bonus with this government incentive. No, I am talking about those buyers who have no reason buying at all and are only even considering it because they feel the power of the $8,000 tax credit is too good of a government gift to let slip through their hands. How many low quality buyers out there are making the same mistakes that led to the housing collapse in the first place? How many of these buyers are stretching their budgets because they feel rushed to buy prior to expiration and an expensive house is the only one that they liked on the open market these past few weeks?
The tax credit, in my opinion, is doing four things:
1) Pulling future demand forward - any buyer that was saving up for and planning to buy in the near future had incentive to pull the trigger earlier to take advantage of the tax credit. These were buyers that were going to buy anyway, and now are doing it at the government's expense
2) Incentivizing low quality buyers to jump in - do not discount this irrationality amongst buyers! I have a hard time believing the banking system is responsible enough to say "NO" to a ready and willing buyer, that may not be 'able' to afford the home they just signed a contract for. If one bank says no, I'm sure the buyer will find another bank that says YES! And that may be motivation enough for the lender to do what needs to be done to get the loan through
3) Artificially propping up housing markets - at the end of the day, this is a very weak foundation to support local housing markets on a longer term sustainable basis
4) Increases the deficit / fraud - this is not free money, although it plays the role of it on TV. As of mid-March, some $12,450,000,000.00 worth of tax credits were claimed (via The Big Picture). Also, lets not turn a blind eye to those engaging in criminal behaviors to defraud the government on this program! From 4-yr olds filing for tax credits, to buyers claiming credits for homes that were never purchased, to other buyers who don't qualify but expect a handout.
You can't make this shit up! But hey, it did make sales go up (albeit temporarily and stealing future demand) and it did prove to be one ingredient among many to reflate housing markets or at the very least, stabilize the hardest hit markets from falling further. To think there will be no unintended consequences from these types of programs is to have your head in the sand. To think banks smartened up and to say 'NO' to all un-able buyers, is to have your head in the sand. Buyers will do anything and everything to tweak a loan application to get it through underwriting and the mortgage brokers out there know how to advise clients as such. That is the world we live in, for better or worse. Gone are the days where a buyer is required to put down 20% of the purchase price, have sufficient post-closing liquidity, and strict employment history and salary as to keep total debt-to-income ratio's under a max of 33% or so. I know for a fact banks are lending to buyers with a d/i ratio of up to 45% these days. Simply amazing.
Now begins the phase where we see the negative whiplash effects from the inverse stimulatory effects these government programs provided the markets. You can't have it both ways. After that the markets will learn to stabilize without government assistance programs - I wonder if the people will soon blame government for any future lull in housing as a direct result of removing these programs? Typical. I say, END THE SUBSIDIES AND GOOD RIDDANCE!



Posted by realist
Sat May 1st, 2010 11:19 AM
Lets face it, without Gov support the banks and housing would have taken this country into a depression. They chose to intervene because it was the politcally correct and easy thing to do.
Posted by Noah
Sat May 1st, 2010 11:43 AM
no argument here realist. It sure was the lesser of the alternative evil. For me and from those calls, I just see the sentiment change from younger buyers as a result of all these bailouts, incentives, and credits. not the best thing to be teaching youngens. When I grew up, I was taught the importance of saving and buying what you can afford and not using debt like it was some free gift. I bought my first condo after saving and I put 20% down. To hear 21-23 yr old kids, right out of college, who want to use a 3.5% FHA down payment loan to buy a 500K-600K apt because they expect to make good money in the next few years, really scares me.
Posted by Eric
Sat May 1st, 2010 06:43 PM
The first-time home buyer tax credit is really a subsidy from Manhattan taxpayers to the rest of the country. Just take a look at the share of Manhattan's federal income tax receipts and the share of the first time home-buyer's tax credit to Manhattan. Almost every household in Manhattan south of 96th street pays federal income tax - while just under 50% of American households pay federal income tax. There will be plenty of areas where this tax credit is another transfer payment from areas that are doing well to areas that are not. The cash for clunkers program is another transfer payment scheme that people in Manhattan are paying for others.
Most condos in Manhattan simply don't qualify for the <800k price. The ones that do, are a small percentage of the overall housing stock and are generally studios in less desirable areas. Almost all co-ops require 20% down - and very few lenders will lend 10% down for a co-op.
Manhattan has plenty of great safeguards that prevented us from the bubble - mostly co-ops that required 20% down and mortgage recording taxes for condos that disincentivize flipping.
We should change the mentality in Washington and the rest of the US that home ownership is an American right - it should require a lot of saving. Not everyone should own a home. We should end many of these inequitable transfer payments.
Posted by rootless cosmopolitan
Sat May 1st, 2010 10:13 PM
Eric,
No real estate bubble in Manhattan? A median home price to median household income ratio of 11 to 13, compared to 6 to 8 or so in the 1990s, spells bubble to me.
Posted by Eric 2
Sun May 2nd, 2010 07:05 AM
I agree manhattan real estate is clearly bubble. Everyone always cites the coop rules as saving us from the euphoria of the real estate bubble, but what they fail to consider is that NYC was the heart if finance and international wealth, which both were made much more wealthy by the asset bubble. The bonuses on wall street were setting records year after year over the past 6 years and NYC benefited more than any other city in the country. Now, as the government introduces legislation to destroy prop desks, curb risk taking, increase disclosure, and limit leverage, I do believe that wall street will go through a period of meaningfully less profitability. It will come back some day, but I think it will be different for a generation.
Posted by MeekSheep
Sun May 2nd, 2010 04:36 PM
For no clearer proof that the tax credit created a "first time buyer bubble" in the past 6 months look outside of Manhattan. We were just up in Marblehead, MA yesterday and saw it first hand. The number of sales recently listed on Zillow were dominated by under 500k sales (62%+.) Going further, under 400k were 66% of those sales, or 40% of the total. The median price home in that area is roughly 500k. Those are all first time home buyers. Sick, no?
With the WSJ reporting government entities backed over 95% of all mortgages ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704093204575216530213580458.html ) how could anyone claim that this whole program wasn't a complete farce? Glad there's a buyer's agent out there saying it like it is. My hats off to you.
Posted by Coconut Grove Homes Sale
Mon May 3rd, 2010 03:06 AM
Thanks for the great post. I'll be more than happy to answer any questions or feedback your readers might have
Posted by Noah
Mon May 3rd, 2010 07:40 AM
ok, how many coconuts does your grove grow?
Posted by Jay
Mon May 3rd, 2010 10:36 AM
I used to be amazed by this kind of stuff (so many people making the same stupid decisions). Now, I'm more amazed that smart people are still amazed by these things. :)
As for the SPAM comments (and it IS SPAM) just delete it.
Posted by Doug Francis
Mon May 3rd, 2010 05:12 PM
I saw a good number of sellers race to get their homes ready to capture the excitement of the moment and who can blame them? And yes, pulling home sale's numbers a few months forward is accurate. It is amazing that home buyers were feeling pressure to get a sale on paper... wasn't it just a year ago that we were going in the opposite direction? Wow.
Okay, now off to read about "shady clients"!
Posted by coach handbags
Thu Aug 12th, 2010 10:13 PM
see the sentiment change from younger buyers as a result of all these bailouts, incentives, and credits. not the best thing to be teaching youngens. When I grew up, I was taught the importance of saving and buying what you can afford and not using debt like it was some free gift. I bought my first condo after saving and I put 20% down. To hear 21-23 yr old kids, right out of college, who want to use a 3.5% FHA down payment loan to buy a 500K-600K apt because they expect to make good money in the next few years, really scares me.