Explaining The 600-Pt Drop on Thursday: No Liquidity
A: There are two different questions we can ask about the 15-minute 600 point drop in the Dow on Thursday. First, we can ask what was the source/trigger of the selloff after the markets already traded down 3%? Second, we can ask how this can possible happen. I have been in a lot of discussions lately with clients, colleagues and friends about the event and want to try to explain the answer to the second question. I can actually answer it with one word: Liquidity. In this case, a lack thereof.
Recall, that for 8 years I was a NASDAQ Momentum Equities trader with a shop formerly known as Tradescape, Inc., which was bought out by E-Trade and later taken private.
Now, the Manhattan real estate market is built on confidence and needs. When trading markets start to do crazy things, it can ripple into the mindsets of buyers and sellers of Manhattan property. For now, I don't see any general change in confidence outside of people 'talking' about the insanity and volatility of the markets recently. Time will tell how this evolves.
Moving on, you need to know a few basic things about how equity markets work. For sake of ease, I copied a visual of Lehman's Level II Stock Quote from a discussion on "Massive Deleveraging" back in September of 2008; kind of fitting to use a IB that no longer exists.

Think of every stock as having two towers; a bid tower (left side tower) and an ask tower (right side tower). At any given point in time, there is an Inside Market that consists of the highest bid & the lowest ask.
Underneath the highest bid (top of the left BID tower) and the lowest ask (top of the right ASK tower) are the supporting bids and offers waiting for the market to reach them. At any point, these bids and offers can be removed by whomever is supplying them. In this case you can see the bids in LEH going down to $9.24 and the offers in LEH going up to $9.52. Although you can't see more, the towers on both sides continue with bids and offers all the way up and all the way down. The market makers and the ECNs (electronic communication networks) are the players that you see in the snapshot above; who basically make a market or provide for a medium of electronic exchange in all securities. These are the guys that are providing for liquidity at any given moment in time for all securities. When I was trading the most popular ECN by far was ISLD (Island ECN), followed by INCA (Instinet), and BTRD (Bloomberg Tradebook) and the off market system of SelectNet.
The Event Thursday - Putting aside the actual cause of the event, what I can tell you is that what normally are very liquid markets immediately became Illiquid the moment traders, HFT boxes, market makers, etc.. figured out something was going on. As a result of this uncertainty and confusion on the downside of the event in an almost panicky manner, bids for most securities were PULLED OUT in essence causing the tower of bids to crumble down upon itself. Looking at the snapshot above, imagine if all the bids under the inside market just disappeared all at the same time; including all the bids below what is shown! That is how the markets plunged 600 points in only a few minutes.
As the markets figured out it was some type of glitch not warranting the move that just occurred, the reverse happened. That is, all the offers were removed in the tower of asks as the equity re-priced itself back to the level it was at before the event. The entire event lasted about 15 minutes as volume tumbled - proof positive of what happens in stock markets when liquidity disappears. Those that were able to pull of trades were either very happy or very upset.
Volume tumbled during the 15-min event because there were NO BIDS TO HIT on the way down and NO OFFERS TO TAKE on the way up. It was utter chaos and something I saw a few times during the course of my trading career. I recall the EMLX hoax back in August of 2000, that basically took the stock down from $104 to $43 in a matter of minutes - the bids basically disappeared as the stock became illiquid and tumbled a few points every 10 seconds until the halt. The stock re-opened around $112 or so later that day and a trader across my desk (known as Big Daddy for his risk taking and cahones) pocketed $400,000 because he loaded up on about 6,000 shares between $50 and $43 before the halt (one of the few traders providing liquidity when nobody else would) - losing around $25,000 before the halt but making $400,000 when the stock reopened. NASDAQ let the trades stand and sucks for those that hit Big Daddy's bids!
Back to the event. Putting the cause aside for a moment, what you guys witnessed is what happens when the stock markets become illiquid. Scary? You bet ya. This is what happens when investors panic and sell into a market with no bids. This is how an index can plunge 6% in 6-7 minutes and rally back in another 6-7 minutes on virtually light volume. In a world of dark pools, high frequency trading algos, and massive institutional trades, it is proof positive that outside forces can trigger markets to become highly illiquid at any time. The structure of these markets are supposed to correct themselves when there is a mis-pricing and always provide for liquid markets - we now know there are flaws in this structure.



Posted by Sechel
Sun May 9th, 2010 12:51 PM
If 70% of volume is high frequency trading then it means the market has been going up in a weak trading environment. High Frequency trading is not real buying considering the nan-second commitment. And among the 30% that were in the market, the buyers had a fair number of people buying because prices were increasing not because they thought stocks represented good value.
What we saw was a hint of what is to come when buyers want to get get out. The high frequency guys do not represent liquidity or bids.
In other words... We're in a lot of trouble This week was just a taste.
Posted by Noah
Sun May 9th, 2010 02:00 PM
"If 70% of volume is high frequency trading"
I can believe it, but I dont want to. These things have an auto cut off switch that the operators can hit when things get nutty intraday. Nothing the exchanges can do about this. Whether its 70% or not, its enough that if these systems are taken out, the market will by herd mentality lose liquidity for a period of time. So basically, we are at all times subject to what happened Thursday.
thx for the comment sechel
Posted by yunling
Sun May 9th, 2010 03:37 PM
explaining the drought in Sahara: NO WATER.
When the wind/cloud systems withdraw, the rain stops and we are at all time subject to dried out brown lawn.there is a flaw in this structure.
cc: the onion.
Posted by Noah
Sun May 9th, 2010 04:07 PM
hehe, good one yunling. the post was after many discussions with colleagues and clients that are not following the markets everyday
Posted by In Debt We Trust
Sun May 9th, 2010 04:28 PM
Noah, can you elaborate on the role that dark pools played in this?
PS - UK rejects Euro bailout plan.
"But the loan guarantees are too much for the UK to swallow, and the UK Treasury will have nothing to do with them. Without the UK onboard the package looks pretty thin."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/10/2894423.htm?section=justin
uh oh.
Posted by Noah
Sun May 9th, 2010 04:37 PM
im sure the institutional desks just removed action near the inside market when they got wind something was off. It doesnt take long for this discovery to happen..tens of seconds, maybe 45 seconds to a minute and Im sure many desks protected their clients by stepping back for a few moments. all liquidity just vanished for 7-9 minutes
Posted by e
Mon May 10th, 2010 12:25 AM
Thanks for your useless edifying article.
Putting aside who caused it as you do puts you
in the bank and politician stooge league.
Spare the world your crap.
Posted by Noah
Mon May 10th, 2010 09:04 AM
yea whatever e...Im not privy to the exact cause, are you? All I know is what happened, not the trigger.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/05/manchurian-candidate-market/
"As the inventor of the continuous double-action, market-making technology (VST tech. US pat. no. 5950176) that is referenced 132 times by program trading and HFT patents since 1996, I can tell you that Goldman, JP Morgan and the gang simply pulled the ‘buys’ from their computer trading programs and manufactured a crash. And when the coast was clear, and it was clear the politicians were not going to vote for anything that would break up the ‘too big to fail’ banks; all the ’sells’ were pulled from the computers and the market roared back."
Posted by Fred
Mon May 10th, 2010 09:40 AM
Noah - 'e' is an arse and I have read the same version of them pulling the plug as you cite. It is the only rational explanation for why the market fell off the ledge for 8 minutes. thanks for posting.
Posted by Noah
Mon May 10th, 2010 09:48 AM
Thanks Fred...those tied to wall street know its a simple explanation. Those outside, know something crazy when on and accept the GLITCH cause for the issue. After many conversations with people outside the street, and hearing many wrong explanations as to HOW the markets can do something like this, I just wanted to post a very simple explanation of it. I know its off topic of the usual Manhattan real estate discussions, but as you know, I need a break sometimes from real estate to stay sane.
Posted by Homes to sell
Sat May 15th, 2010 09:09 AM
This is good information. Great post regarding real estate. Thanks for this.
Posted by Mbt
Wed Jun 2nd, 2010 10:40 PM
I think another reason fees are not being paid and free months not offered is that prices have come down. Apartments are moving but part of the reason is that prices came down to a point at which they will move.
Posted by coach handbags
Fri Aug 13th, 2010 04:18 AM
happened. That is, all the offers were removed in the tower of asks as the equity re-priced itself back to the level it was at before the event. The entire event lasted about 15 minutes as volume tumbled - proof positive of what happens in stock markets when liquidity disappears. Those that were able to pull of trades were either very happy or very upset.