Fed Update: "Low Funds Rate For Extended Period"
A: Quick check into the fed meeting and statement today.
As expected the Fed left rates unchanged and continues a zero interest rate policy. Actually rates are not zero, but rather hovering between 0.11% - 0.13% or so. Close enough right.
Here is the full Fed Statement.
In my opinion there are a few main things going on here that people should be aware of - Ill point out in bold and then include the fed wording in quotes:
A) Gradual Wind-down of Emergency Liquidity Programs - My thoughts on exit strategy were discussed here back in August. "First they will slowly remove emergency credit facilities", was my starting point.
In the fed's words:
"In light of ongoing improvements in the functioning of financial markets, the Committee and the Board of Governors anticipate that most of the Federal Reserve’s special liquidity facilities will expire on February 1, 2010, consistent with the Federal Reserve’s announcement of June 25, 2009. These facilities include the Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility, the Commercial Paper Funding Facility, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, and the Term Securities Lending Facility. The Federal Reserve will also be working with its central bank counterparties to close its temporary liquidity swap arrangements by February 1. The Federal Reserve expects that amounts provided under the Term Auction Facility will continue to be scaled back in early 2010. The anticipated expiration dates for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility remain set at June 30, 2010, for loans backed by new-issue commercial mortgage-backed securities and March 31, 2010, for loans backed by all other types of collateral."
The liquidity spigots that have been wide open and caused a huge carry trade in search for yield, will slowly be turned off.
B) Engineered Bank Recapitalization Environment Will Continue - Make no mistake about it, the fed has successfully engineered an environment suitable for the banks to recapitalize themselves. We can debate the merits of their policy choices in another discussion. The point was to recapitalize the banks, period - and we are in the process of doing this.
Yes unemployment is high and rising, yes we faced a severe recession, but the real damage was done to the banking system and that is where the fed is trying to target their fixes. Without healthy banks even when the economy and unemployment start to recover, lending will be subdued at best. Many think lending will be subdued anyway as accounting rule changes and off balance sheet rule changes will drag the writedown process out for years; i.e. zombie banks. I probably put myself in that camp. We still do not know how far off the marks are for CMBS, Whole Loans, P/E lbo's, etc.., or where these mis-marked assets may be hiding off balance sheet.
Everything and anything was done to help the banks. Now the street is riding the dollar carry gravy train looking for yield!
C) Lending Rates Are Super Low Because The Fed Wants Them That Way - Duh, right? Lending rates are likely 50-75bps lower than they probably would be due to a massive debt monetization experiment in which the fed is buying agency debt and agency mortgage backed securities. The total purchases are set to reach around $1.425 trillion! Umm, I don't even know what that is anymore. Given that close to $2 trillion in losses in the shadow banking system and who knows how many future anticipated losses are sitting on the books of the financials now that every rule was changed to benefit banks, the number is not as inflationary as some may think. In short, the money printing is not entering the economy!
Rather, the banks continue to hoard just under $1.1 Trillion in Excess Reserves as seen in the chart below (via the St. Louis fed).

Why would they do this? Two main reasons that I see:
1) Banks should not and are not lending to consumers and businesses that are experiencing declining credit quality in a rising unemployment environment where everyone seems to be spending less, and...
2) Money is being hoarded to help absorb future loan losses that were not taken and rebuild capital ratios
If you see other reasons why the banks are hoarding, please speak up! These are the main reasons I think banks are not increasing lending, and rightfully so. Its the one thing banks got right in this whole mess.
So, rates are low because the fed wants them that way. In the fed's own words:
"To provide support to mortgage lending and housing markets and to improve overall conditions in private credit markets, the Federal Reserve is in the process of purchasing $1.25 trillion of agency mortgage-backed securities and about $175 billion of agency debt."Which leaves us at what moves the fed may have next as they formulate an exit strategy. In my opinion, its the same as I thought back in August:
1. First they will slowly remove emergency credit facilities - that is clear
2. Second, they will be forced to raise rates - timing is iffy, and markets may force their hand
3. Third, they can sell securities to primary dealers via POMO at the NY Fed, thereby draining liquidity from excess reserves - likely way out there, maybe 2011-2012.
4. And finally, as a final and more aggressive measure, we could see capital or reserve requirements tightened on banks to hold back aggressive lending that may cause inflationary pressures and money velocity to surge. - at some point, yes.
These are my thoughts on the fed, what the fed is doing, the environment they are engineering, and what likely steps they have ahead of them over the next 2-4 years. Since they don't want to rattle markets or do anything counterproductive to their bank recap goals, these steps will likely be implemented slowly and in stages.



Comments (8)
noah, I'm not quite ready to buy yet but I am close. when do you think rates will really start to go up? i dont care so much about a rise of 1/4 or 1/3 of a point, but i do care if rates are 6% or higher.
do you see this anytime soon?
Posted by soontobeowner | December 16, 2009 3:32 PM
Honestly, no. If you are close to buying, I take that to mean sometime over the next few months? Is that right?
Unless something crazy happens, few failed bond auctions, sovereign default, etc..I dont see rates surging that much so soon.
If by close to buying you mean a year, well, that is entirely possible as that is very far out and anything can happen in 12 months.
Posted by Noah | December 16, 2009 3:43 PM
Actually, I have seen reports from the Fed themselves in the WSJ that show the MBS purchase program is responsible for about 100 bps in rates. Calculated risk also has a piece on it below:
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/12/feds-sack-mbs-purchases-lowered.html
The next link shows his own analysis. I would think that once the fed stops purchasing MBS securities, we could see a bump around 75 bps.
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/11/fed-and-mortgage-rates.html
Posted by Brian23 | December 16, 2009 4:10 PM
This would push rates just under 6% at the same time the housing version of the cash for clunkers is ending and more inventory, including shadow inventory, is coming on to the market.
Posted by Brian23 | December 16, 2009 4:13 PM
Yes, very possible, so that brings us to mid 5s or so? I know rates are under 5% now as my client took out a jumbo conforming and got 4 3/4%...crazy.
Now the question is, does natural market forces add to the increase when the fed stops purchases and meddling with rates and FFR starts to go higher?
We all now endgame will bring with it an adjustment higher in rates, and that this world is not going to be around forever. But when does it happen and how fast/furious is that leg up in rates to the new world that isnt here yet?
thanks for comment Brian!
Posted by Noah | December 16, 2009 4:37 PM
I would not be surprised to see the Fed keep rates where they are for all of 2010. This is an election year and Bernanke's, as well as the Democrat's main concern is job creation. Since I don't see that happening in a meaningful way until August at the earliest, I can't see how Bernanke will raise rates if unemployment has not appreciably improved. In addition, I don't see any inflationary concerns at all...wages are depressed, I strongly suspect commodities will come down in price in 2010, and housing is nowhere near a place where prices will appreciate.
I do suspect that there will be some substantial disruption in the credit markets of at least one of the PIGS which will lead to a flight to the dollar and our Treasuries. The main domestic concern I would have for 2010 is the problems of State budgets and pensions, which could cause another round of "stimulus" and serve as a catalyst for Gold.
Posted by mh23 | December 16, 2009 8:44 PM
its a good point mh23, but I wonder if a disruption in credit will come from a semi big bank in semi big trouble. maybe somewhere else? currency crisis? sovereign default? failed bond auctions? something we are not thinking of!
as for rates, Ill take the UNDER on the AUG 2010 rate hike date. I think the markets will force their hand by then, and rates will at least go up a bit from current ZIRP. Maybe 0.75%, maybe 0.5%, who knows. But a rate move in some capacity.
As for gold, it didnt get silly yet. I see a dollar short unwind giving another leg down for gold before the silliness happens. Cant time it. I sold my equity etfs and my near term calls. Still got my longer term calls. Looking to reload, but looking for a dip below 1,000 to do so. Recall it did go to 750 or so before jumping to record highs. It could easily go to 980, before going to 1400.
If it doesnt, well its stronger than I thought
Posted by Noah | December 16, 2009 8:58 PM
I agree with you that there are many unknown variables that could easily occur and put some fear back into the markets. For me, as we discussed when the Dubai news first broke, the easiest to imagine pertained to sovereign debt. However, Meredith Whitney has argued that the reason the government is so amenable to getting repaid the tarp money is because they will need that money for either more stimulus, or to help state's or both.
You may be right on the Fed raising rates, and if you are, it will probably be another catalyst to strengthen the dollar and punish commodities and probably stocks as well.
As for Gold, I sold my entire position on the Monday when Dubai broke. I too would be looking to reenter after it broke through 1000 because I do believe that the state budgets are in big trouble and I see more need for government stimulus coming.
My biggest positions remain UUP and several vehicles used to short US stocks and China. I am watching them closely as they have done nothing yet, but if we break to the upside I will get out quick, but my sense is that the market has a 10-15% retracement at least in the coming months.
Posted by mh23 | December 17, 2009 7:52 AM