Come Out Come Out Wherever You Are

Sorry to have been so unproductive lately. I have been taking care of some personal business that will hopefully be settled soon and I will be able to get back to a more normal writing schedule. Just a few observations today.....with unfortunately not much statistical back-up to refer to.
Jim Grant of Grant's Interest Rate Observer wrote an essay in the Weekend Journal last weekend that I found noteworthy precisely because, as the author put it, he is "Not famously a glass half-full kind of fellow." He was being kind. Grant is usually downright downbeat, as well he should be, being a seer of all things related to interest rates and therefore by definition an armchair dismal scientist (economist). Grant's essay can be boiled down to its subtitle "The deeper the slump, the zippier the recovery." The bottom line being that throughout American history, not only have we experienced more profound downturns than the one we have just been through, but even following policy errors the economy has bounced back. In fact it has bounced back more strongly, the sharper the downturn. The exception being the Great Depression, when several policy mistakes were made accompanied by the "dust bowl" climate aberration, when the economy was very significantly leveraged to agriculture.
I'm a contrarian, but the problem with being a contrarian is that you have to identify what the consensus thinks or is doing in order to do the opposite. In this case I do believe that Grant has a non-consensus opinion, although looking at the stock market one might think that everyone believes him and is betting stocks to beat the band in their effort to sing from the same hymnal.
I was recently privileged to hear stock market strategist Jason Trennert of Strategas Research Partners speak at the C.L. King "Best Ideas" conference in New York City. Trennert noted in his talk entitled "Bullish Till the Bill Comes Due" that both anecdotal and statistical evidence from folks suggests that John Q. Public has been a buyer of bonds and foreign equities, not the U.S. stock market, and his hedge fund clients have in no way embraced this rally with passion. Trennert also noted that the average rally during the Japanese lost decade was 61% (7 different bear-killing episodes). He also recounted how the mid-Depression rally from 1933 to 1937 was a 372% gusher. In keeping with Grant's piece Trennert also noted that despite an unimpressive contraction in real GDP of 2.2% in the latest recession (several recessions in the last 100 years exceeded 3% on the downside), government stimulus, both fiscal and monetary, totalling 29.9% of GDP is off the charts vs. even the monster 8.3% spent from 1929 to 1933. All of this argues for more upside to both the economy and the current bull market.
Unfortunately, my buddy Stan Weinstein reports that mutual fund managers are reported to have spent down much of their cash chasing the recent rally. That datapoint, however, is practically the only one is his monthly "Weight of the Evidence" indicators that is flashing even a yellow light. Away from mutual fund cash, technically the market is signalling all systems go and Stan advises that pullbacks will be controlled and met with buying by those who are still looking for opportunities to get in.
I personally am wary that the market has gone from trading 20% below its 200-day moving average to 20% above it, i.e., the easy money has been made, folks - take a victory lap if you were buying when everyone else was panicking. Yet I am still tantalized by the prospect that the bear case, which everyone can now quote chapter and verse, could be wrong.
Let's review:
The consumer is 70% of the economy.
The consumer's greatest asset is their home and home prices have nowhere to go but down.
High unemployment has everyone scared to death and those who can spend are loath to, while the overlevered majority is having to kick up their savings rate and cannot spend.
Due to structural issues with the economy....the U.S. no longer produces anything anyone wants.....employment will be very slow to come back.
The bull case is a painstakingly slow recovery if the residential and commercial real estate debacles don't yet drag us back into a deflationary spiral. Our economy is doomed and our dollar is worthless so buy gold.
If the economy somehow gets up any head of steam it will be due to over-stimulation which will cause mega inflation, so buy gold.
I learned long ago on Wall Street that whenever the crowd can easly articulate the bull case for a stock, the stock had probably had its run. Likewise, whenever everybody was wise to the short story on a stock, it was probably near its bottom. For this reason I constantly question the accepted facts. So I was delighted to read Business Week's recent analysis "Reconsidering Consumers' Impact on the U.S. Economy." In the articles the author showed the GDP accounts where the 70% of GDP comes from. Here is the breakdown:

The articles points out that each one of the categories above includes very significant items that are not paid for directly by consumers, are partially paid for by the government or employers, or are simply econometric creations like "non-farm owners' equivalent rent." Their estimate of direct consumer spending as a percentage of the economy is 40%. Recently I read some additional work, which I can't put my hands on this minute, implying that....as with most data....the over-levered consumer balance sheet is not, as the averages would have you believe, incredibly pervasive, but rather more a product of a minority who are deathly over-levered and a majority who are in much better shape. I will revisit some of the other assumptions in the consensus view of the economy in upcoming pieces as well as my personal conspiracy theory that some of the driving technologies that will help turn around the U.S. economy longer-term are actually being kept quiet and for good reason (no I have not gone totally batty). I'm not telling anyone to run out and buy stocks on margin, nor am I pretending that this economy and the American nation doesn't have a long row to hoe. But get out from under your desks folks.....enough already. There is a decent chance that we have seen the worst part of this recession, both stocks and businesses may be able to succeed and flourish in the environment of the next decade, and it's time to start thinking more about how to make that happen. And by the way, if you're about to have a baby, have survived this long in your job and have 20% to put down on a property, it's okay to start trauling for some values in the New York City real estate market. Just don't expect to get rich on New York real estate any time soon.



Posted by anonymous
Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 01:06 PM
interesting take. One rhetorical question: if most consumers are not over-leveraged and the apparent leverage on the consumer is concentrated on a small group, what does this say about the health of the loans to consumers? This concentrated group is that much more leveraged than average, and that means the loans carried by banks, etc. are back by much less cash flow.
Posted by In Debt We Trust
Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 04:41 PM
What are your thoughts on the dollar? Especially in the context of today's FOMC meeting?
Posted by jeff
Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 06:49 PM
Anon,
I do think that the bad debt experience is terrible (how far from being able to support the debt many debtors are, I think the severity is bad (value of the collateral vs. what was loaned) but I think the largest institutions have probably raised enough capital at this point to avoid the losses and the system will be able to absorb...though barely....the other bank failures that are coming. The deflationary forces are being stretched out over a long period of time synthetically and will be a drag on the lending capacity of the banking system for sveral years to come.
In Debt,
I was talking to a big time hedge fund trader the other week about gold and how I was a little perplexed by it's big move. He said the economy is getting better, inflation is coming and the dollar is @#%(*! So I scratched my head and said ...Ok I get it. I actually think gold is serving as a hedge against the two big fears inflation and deflation and is capturing funds from those afraid of being long equities. I don't see any possible chance of headline inflation with capacity utilization at historic lows, un-employment at recent historic highs and China deflating everything they export. At the same time misery will be high as raw materials prices go up with China consuming more and more each day and becoming a bigger and bigger part of incremental demand. The dollar dive will be self limiting because the Chinese have linked their currency to the dollar and if the Yuan crashes they lose money and will compete Europe and the rest of Asia into the ground....which will strengthen both the $ and Yuan relative wise. I do believe that if the U.S. government does not convince the rest of the world that our current budget deficit isn't the "new normal" there will be consequences. All nations will seek to diversify away from dollars, but who wants Euros or Yen...the best alternative is commodities. I beleive China is already tapering off its internal production of commodities in favor of stealing ours at rock bottom prices and both preserving their own internal supplies, cutting down on mining accidents and pollution and divesting dollars.
Posted by mike greenspan
Thu Sep 24th, 2009 08:35 AM
I think one would have to be pretty naive to expect real estate buyers to suddenly behave in a rational way. The collective sentiment that drove prices into the stratosphere will now drag prices below subjective "fair value" (it's only worth what someone is willing to pay). Manipulation of todays lending rate is only prolonging this process. Rising taxes and lower wages (in real dollars) also make the commitment of renting money to purchase a home unattractive.
Posted by In Debt We Trust
Thu Sep 24th, 2009 10:56 PM
Jeff,
Thanks for replying. The Fed basically said it would continue printing money,
"We will keep interest rates low through a variety of unconventional measures" [I am paraphrasing here].
Just today, these unconventional measures have come to include money market funds - a multi billion dollar cash hoard where Bernanke can make anyone w/a money market account an unwitting participant of Treasury transactions. The best [worst?] part of it all? Your money market funds will be guaranteed with subprime loans.
http://debtsofanation.blogspot.com/2009/09/debts-of-spenders-fed-plans-to-continue.html
Investors are still skittish and very wary of the market. Most are still in cash. It's ironic but Bernanke is targetting this pool by viewing it as a giant piggy bank.
I've been watching convertible bond offerings closely too. Equities may actually be a decent inflation hedge - especially if the strike is hit. In the meantime, a steady income stream isn't too shabby either in the [current ]deflationary environment.