It's Times Like These When Money Returns To Its Rightful Owners
"It's Times Like These When Money Returns To Its Rightful Owners": So said a banking executive from a conservative Midwest bank I heard speak recently. I'll admit it: I'm a lover of poetry and I even used to write some myself. No worries - I'll spare you. But there is something so poetic to me about the statement above and how emblematic it should be of our capitalist system. I have often commented that it's not the smartest guys/gals who make the most money, it's the guys/gals with the biggest cohones. This has apparently now been scientifically proven in a University of Chicago study reported on recently by Bloomberg News. My understanding is that newly appointed French pay Czar Michel Camdessus, who like the Chicagoans is a devout free markets disciple, is considering allowing French bank traders to keep their bonus payout ratios if they will just submit to castration.....dust off those guillotines.
But seriously, while those who are the most ardent risk takers often amass large sums of money, it is those who shepherd their capital wisely who keep wealth.....and pay the least taxes. It is the times of mean reversion when the cavalier surrender their ill-gotten gains to their more reticent skinflint cousins. There is a cleansing effect that goes along with this redistribution of wealth. The burning down of over-growth makes room for new green shoots that have room to grow. Profit margins in entire industries rise, because competition is thinned. But it is thinned by the exit of those who produced little or no economic value with the capital they controlled and their revenue is re-allocated to those who are much more productive with their capital. This brings our entire economy forward, and while there are times when grand experiments....like using sock puppets to sell goods online.....are merited, so too are there times that the excesses need to be wrung out.
Unfortunately, I don't think my wise midwestern banker friend is right that now is the time when money will return to its rightful owners. In fact, everywhere I look I see barriers being erected to prevent this from happening. The government has bailed out the banking system and is subsidizing purchases of the toxic assets that do trade.....a precious few after more than six months into the effort to re-liquify the system. The stock market rally that has been engineered is allowing capital raising by a much wider group than the truly worthy. I could not have put it any more eloquently than this quote from today's Wall Street Journal article about why REITs will inherit the earth in the commercial real estate space.
"Everyone was predicting a have-and-have-not scenario, and that didn't play out at all," says Debra Cafaro, chief executive of health-care REIT Ventas Inc. "What happened was indiscriminate access to capital, which has buoyed the whole sector."
While the chart to the left clearly shows that overall REITs were much better stewards of capital, collectively being net sellers at the top of commercial real estate, versus other players who were net buyers, many were not good stewards of capital. This has apparently been overlooked in the recent capital raising orgy.
This is merely a microcosm of the world in general, where for various reasons the wheat is only being separated from the chafe during times of extreme distress, other than that sloppy stewardship of capital is being rewarded as markets fail to differentiate the good from the bad. I believe that this is due to an incredible shift to short-term thinking which has pervaded our society, as I discussed in my piece "Trading Mentality: The 8th Deadly Sin."

The chart to the left which I lifted from a Seeking Alpha article entitled Stock Return Dispersion and the VIX Forecast Alpha Dispersion demonstrates that differentiation in stock performance is highly correlated with volatility. What it does not explicitly say, that savvy Urban Digs readers know, is that volatility is more often than not associated with declining stock markets. So it is in bad markets that good is segregated from the bad. This is a trend that I believe is increasing to the increasing dominance of hedge funds, which are by nature trend chasers, due to their need to generate short-term performance, and particularly by the growth of statistical arbitrage strategies which buy laggards and sell leaders in a group such that the stocks are pushed back into their historical correlations, when they get out of whack. (I am sure that one of our physics PhD readers can correct my misrepresentation of statistical arbitrage, but while I am misrepresenting I should mention that this strategy is so crowded that it apparently now needs the help of front-running - flash trading - to keep producing returns.) Since stock markets historically go up much more often than they go down, historically stocks have lower full cycle return dispersions than bear market return dispersions. It's a self-reinforcing trend. Unfortunately, it is not in the interest of our capitalist system, where stocks are not just pieces of paper or mathematical ciphers; they represent businesses that either add efficiency to our economy or don't and are supposed to be winners or losers based on these trends. We have collectively created an environment where as long as you don't go under you win....and by the way, we have very little tolerance for anybody big going under. It's Trump world. We have created it. Can we undo it, or has the system gotten so far out of our control that we are doomed to be Japan without even really trying to be?



Posted by In Debt We Trust
Thu Aug 27th, 2009 11:14 AM
Speaking of money and the vix, did you notice how the PCR spiked yesterday after the consumer data came out? You can also see the same thing on the e-mini.
Also, for what it's worth, there is another POMO treasury op scheduled for next week (1 year).
Posted by Rick Arvielo
Thu Aug 27th, 2009 11:27 AM
Thanks for the information
Posted by Scott
Thu Aug 27th, 2009 12:45 PM
Jeff,
Sorry for this, but I can't seem to get in touch with Noah. His Halstead e-mail is not working. Can you have him shoot me a quick e-mail. Got something for him. Thanks
Posted by Jeff
Thu Aug 27th, 2009 01:03 PM
Scott you can get Noah at Noah@UrbanDigs.com - He has left Halstead.
Posted by lars
Thu Aug 27th, 2009 01:09 PM
Jeff,
What you say is true, but I am equally convinced that if we do not mend our ways our current financial economy, driven by indiscriminant access/allocation of capital, will work right up until the moment it doesn't.
At some point, God knows further into the future than I can rightly appreciate, the system will collapse, and in the most spectacular of ways. All the printing of money, if squandered, will bankrupt the country. You only get so many bites at the apple before all you are left with is the core.
Posted by lr10021
Thu Aug 27th, 2009 02:19 PM
We have this thing in this country called bankruptcy, but most of the times it is just the opposite of bankruptcy - It is another form of bailout. Only banks are treated differently but all other businesses generally continue. That means they keep paying wages (as much as they could), keep producing (as much as they could), and try to emerge as an entity of value. But isn't emerging from a bankruptcy just a dress up? Shouldn't these company's really be completely liquidated, disected and sold off, or nationalized in order to sell them off? Thereby creating less product and making way for truly new players. I think it is ridiculous that so many failed firms still do business, when simply put they failed. Some people say we are too capitalistic. But I disagree, I think we are much less capitalistic than we could be and while it may mean disrupting the system, true capitalism is the only way to ensure that money is the hands of its rightful owners. IMO the gov't should have ruthlessly gone after an orderly shut down of companies to big too fail, and in doing so, would have directed money into the hands of the strongest players to either consolidate the market or breed new genius. But instead of doing that they too their BS stance and now thanks to them, the customer service at failed companies will not improve, products will not improve, and the cycle will just be delayed, again. People blame Lehman for disorderly credit markets, but credit is the only thing that is functioning the way it should right now, being very conservative. But are GM factories really functioning the way they should be? Should AIG really still be in our minds? By nationalizing anything with the intention of not shutting it down, we just made a really big mistake. I don't know how it will come back to bite us, but at a minimum we just created a less competitive business climate.
Posted by jeff
Thu Aug 27th, 2009 09:19 PM
LR10021,
I do think that in the midst of crisis it is difficult to allow large failures that add to systemic risk. Unfortunately, our economic, financial and market systems have become so complex that no one person really understood how they could all come unglued at once and how overlaps between banks, money market funds, credit default swaps, mortgage insurers, bond insurers created in George Bushes' inimitable words "a house of cards." However, I like you am very convinced that the cleansing that comes with allowing for rationalization and closing of excess productive capacity and excess fixed assets is necessary and it is very damaging to prop these things up. We doom ourselves to an overhang of mal-investment while resources continue to be hogged by dead end companies and malingering assets. What scares me most is not just the decisions that our government is making by choice to allow this, but the systemic issues in our financial markets, where once the storm passes every stock is a good stock, all companies deserve to be able to raise equity partly due to very low dispersion of returns between companies. There is very little differentiation between companies and I think it's because of the same black box mentality we saw in mortgages. It's all looked at as a statistical stew, this is not what capitalism intended. It's survival of the fittest, it's not survival of anyone within two standard deviations of the mean.
Posted by In Debt We Trust
Fri Aug 28th, 2009 01:55 PM
China recently became the world's biggest consumer of gold. Guess they don't like all the games going on w/US govt accounting.
http://debtsofanation.blogspot.com/2009/08/debts-of-lenders-china-becomes-worlds.html