Insights from the NY City Bar

Posted by Jeff Bernstein on June 2, 2009 at 2.20 PM

Bar.jpg
As Urban Digs readers may know, last night my partner Jim Gannon and I gave a course entitled Real Estate Valuation Basics for Legal Professionals at the New York City Bar. I was crass enough to advertise it on Urban Digs, because our initial sign up count was embarrassingly small. Whether it was the ever increasing reach of Urban Digs, or the efforts of the City Bar, we managed to coral over 50 attendees, with the mere attraction of continuing education credits and some coffee and snacks.

Fortunately neither Jim nor I tripped on a banana peel and fell off the stage. The very comfortable, one might even say posh new auditorium at the City Bar (no more miniature desks with fold up arms) was, for all its multi-media splendor (we were taped and webcast live, had the benefit of flat panel monitors throughout the room displaying our powerpoint and a remote control with laser pointer that worked) way too hot. The fact that no audience members were snoring discernibly during the three hour program, we take not only as testament to the compelling subject matter of our presentation, but more so the talents of our distinguished guest panelists. Color and life was brought to our somewhat dry class materials, by the presence on two discussion panels of:

Martin Levine MAI - Chairman of Metropolitan Valuation Associates
Marc Shapiro - attorney with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Roger Roisman - attorney with Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP
Lee Spiegelman - Split Rock Group, New York real estate financier, investor and manager.

Our first panel discussion was Characteristics of the Current New York City Real Estate Market. Marty Levine discussed the commercial appraisers' role as a reporter of market trends and the extreme difficulty in valuing properties when there are hardly any data points to report on. What data points there are may not be reflective of "normally motivated" sales or may not have had sufficient "market exposure" because in all likelihood someone selling a commercial property in this environment needs to rather than chooses to do so. Not a lot of new news came out in terms of market data. Commercial office rents and retail rents are believed to be down as much as 30%, with occupancy down significantly. However, one important observation was Marty Levine's comment that over-supply was not at all the issue in New York in the residential and multi-family rental market. The issue driving price declines is affordability (Marty felt that this was an issue for retail as well).

NYC%20Land%20Price.jpg

Due to the bubble in land prices in New York (that I have commented on numerous times in the past - NY City Land: Will High Prices Cure High Prices? ) and the high cost of building anything in the city, affordability was sacrificed. New York is still a supply constrained market with fairly high occupancy, despite occupancy having recently taken a hit from the economic downturn. Levine's conclusion was that New York City multi-family would inevitably bounce back, but from lower pricing levels. When asked what the hardest areas to appraise in New York City were, he pointed to frontier areas like the far west side where prices had run-up during the upturn, for neighborhoods that may not have really "made it" yet. The most difficult asset class to appraise these days, in Marty's opinion mixed use residential with retail. Another interesting note for commercial real estate aficionado's, industrial/manufacturing space seems to be holding up best of all asset classes due to the relative dearth of remaining space in and around Manhattan.

Marc Shapiro confided that the bulk of his business now relates to restructuring of distressed loans. While his experience has been primarily assisting lenders, he has also been working with some owners and sponsors. He revealed that owners in some cases are still in denial about their predicaments, but less so about the reality that they have no equity in their properties at current market prices....whatever current market really is. As an example of the odd congruence of both these positions he noted a project sponsor for whom he helped negotiate one of the best restructurings for a client he can remember. Marc had insisted on the client being totally transparent with all of the financial and construction/construction management information the sponsor had, counter to his client's instincts. The bank had responded with the following (incredible) offer.

The client was actually released from all personal guarantees for the loan, the bank agreed to fund completion of the project, the sponsor was given flexibility to negotiate discounts on unit sales and was even given 6% of every sales dollar as an entrepreneurial incentive to stay on and finish out the project. Upon concluding the deal the client confided, "I think I got screwed."

The idea that the bigger the project's financial predicament the more likely that the bank will bargain, seems to be persuasive. Everyone thinks they're Donald Trump, but according to Shapiro the banks are nonplussed as the line of Donald Trumps is quickly stretching down the block and around the corner. Shapiro's advice to his bank clients, make a deal now or sell the loan. You don't want to own assets, you are going to own more than you know what to do with in due time.

Agreeing with the idea that the bottom has not yet been seen and cannot be predicted, Marty Levine commented, "until a more normal financing environment returns you can't even talk about seeing a bottom."

Our second panel was entitled Case Study: The Broken Condominium Development, during which Lee Spiegelman of Split Rock Group discussed his evaluation of a note purchase from a bank on a broken condo development, which I am proud to say my firm Guild Partners brought to his attention. Lee started off by talking about his family's position going into this downturn. His family's real estate construction, management and ownership business, PLP Companies, has been active in New York City for many years and learned a few things about downcycles managing properties for Freddie Mac in the late 80s and early 90s. At the time, Lee was working on Wall Street where he was taught "When the ducks are quacking feed them" and feed them he did, disposing of many of his family's properties in the city from 2005 to 2007, when he saw financial players buying at multiples he just couldn't rationalize.

Lee believes that the current cycle may play out like the prior one, with a long workout and then basing period before prices appreciate again (and a future peak coming around 2023). But he believes that it is time to start looking for opportunities selectively, with the best values to be found now, in messier situations. He ran through the evaluation of the partially built condo's economics as a rental, including assumptions on rents, rent up time, stabilized vacancy and collection loss and operating expense ratios. His conclusion; a reasonable bid to the bank on this note was about 50 - 60% of the value of the construction loan. This demonstrates the significant downside between value as a condo and value as a rental, a spread which most likely will converge towards the downside.

Spiegleman voiced some skepticism that TARP, TALF, PIPP TARPII, Son of TARP and TARP Wars: The Return of TARP would do much to aid the healing process in commercial real estate. Roger Roisman agreed, reporting that his advice to developers he deals with is to dispose of problem projects now, because things will get worse before they get better. He discussed some of the disconnects caused by the fee driven environment of the earlier part of the decade and the divorce of underwriting from ownership. Roger also discussed the many complications around the unwinding of complex capital stacks utilized, even in mid-sized deals in recent years. In the case of a simple disposition by a bank of a busted condo development, the acts of selling the note or foreclosing will in many cases trigger rights of rescission, which allow any buyers in the building to get out of their contracts, most likely relegating the project to rental status. Struggles between mezz lenders, preferred equity players and first lien lenders to preserve value and their potential equity in the deal follow. If a bank sells a note, which triggers the rights of rescission they may be wiping out the preferred equity or mezz lender's only hope for preserving value....that's what I call messy. Roger also noted that instituional real estate investors in many cases were using leverage, not just at the deal level, but at the partnership level as well, creating some serious balance sheet issues. He noted that other institutions like REITs, which have access to the capital markets have greater flexibility to deal in these uncertain times. He expected Simon Properties for one to be on the prowl for retail center cast offs from other REITs and investors. Roger also touched on the idea that quality of location would be coming back into vogue. In the prior decade the rule book was thrown out with regard to where new condominium projects could be successful, like Marty Levine, he believes that prime neighborhoods will endure the downturn and attract new development better than frontier areas.

It was muggy affair temperature wise, but we received a warm reception from members of the bar, to whom we are grateful, and especially so to our panel members who provided the most interesting material of the evening.

Comments (7)

I'm picking up signs of institutional bullish bias from Eurodollar futures positions per the Commitment of Traders reports.

Bullish positions in Eurodollar futures are a key sign of resurgent market sentiment. Stronger credit markets = more originations and fees for financials.

http://debtsofanation.blogspot.com/2009/06/debts-of-spenders-cme-and-eurodollar.html

Posted by In Debt We Trust | June 2, 2009 3:25 PM

Very interesting post - thank you. If you plan to do more CLEs, please let us know.

Also, as an aside, if Noah is feeling better I would be interested in his thoughts on Jim Welch's latest investment letter, particularly the last paragraph, discussing gold:

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/06/jim-welsh-investment-letter-%e2%80%93-may-22-2009/

Posted by Thisson | June 2, 2009 4:20 PM

Thisson - Welsh says: "Last month, investors were advised to short Gold in a number of ways, depending on risk tolerances. The most conservative way would be to short GLD, which is the ETF tied to gold, or by buying DZZ, which is the 2 to 1 short gold ETF, or by shorting Gold futures, which is the most aggressive."

well that certainly didnt work out well. Im long gold since mid 2007 when signs of credit crisis started to appear - mid 600s. Im holding, although I did sell a little bit. I also have some OCT - JAN 2010 calls on gld, just in case gold runs and I get scared out of the stock. I have a tendency of selling way too early on runs.

I think the gold trade is two fold:

1) anti-fiat currency trade, hedge against quality of feds balance sheet, quantitative easing and fiscal/monetary stimulus

2) inflation whiplash

I thought #1 above would power first run in gold, and #2 would power the latter run. Natural order of markets, once gold reaches high 900s or breaks highs, Im sure many will short as its failed the last 3 times to run thereafter. If the run persists, guess who will get squeezed, just as shorts are powering this equity rally higher now. Same could occur, and fundamentals can go out the window as speculators and momentum trades and short squeezes push gold. but the reason I own is the 2 noted reasons

Posted by Noah | June 2, 2009 4:43 PM

Meanwhile in Jersey City ....

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Florida-style desperation to move condo inventory is headed for a neighbor of the Big Apple.

Metrovest Equities, developer of The Beacon in Jersey City, plans to auction 25 one- and two-bedroom luxury units June 27 at a nearby hotel. A dozen units are being offered "regardless of price" - an attention-grabbing measure designed to draw traffic. Suggested opening bids range from $150,000 to $250,000; they were originally priced from $380,000 to $700,000.

http://online.wsj.com/article/
BT-CO-20090602-713003.html

Posted by In Debt We Trust | June 2, 2009 5:04 PM

I will certainly let you know if we are invited back to speak at the Bar. In Debt, someone on one of our panles mentioned last night (I think it was Roger Roisman) that both Hoboken and Jersey City were sites of lots of broken condo deals....I would add Brooklyn. This fell under the category of pullbacks in frontier markets. i am actually surprised Harlem has not had more publicized blood shed. Lots of the condos up there were small sized and probably easier to get to 71% sold and to bridge through sell out difficulties.

Posted by jeff | June 2, 2009 7:28 PM

Noah,

Thanks for the response. I like your thesis, and I like your strategy of holding calls, however I expect that between #1 and #2 there will be a massive bout of deflation of indeterminate length ala Japan.

I am noticing a lot of deflationary anecdotes lately - here are some quick examples:

1) salary cuts at major law firms:

http://abovethelaw.com/2009/06/salary_cut_watch_dorsey_whitne.php

2) Gucci & Coach altering their product mix to include more lower-priced products of higher quality (ie a focus on "value"):

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601113&sid=a0JlxwMQZD.I&refer=spend

Posted by Thisson | June 3, 2009 12:06 PM

Great stuff. I can’t stand it when we see real estate again with only 1 generic picture in MLS and they wonder why their property isn’t being showed

Posted by Miami Gardens Homes | April 27, 2010 7:47 AM

Post a comment


To help maintain the integrity of the conversation we ask that each user simply paste the keyword (below in red) into the confirmation field below. Sorry, but if you forget this step, your comments will not be saved!