Stage 10 Starting Already? Expect Fed To Step Up
A: It seems there are rising concerns in the treasury market, marking what I referred to as Stage 10 of this crisis and part of endgame. From a trader standpoint, I define endgame as the final phase of a bigger situation; the end result of actions taken to deal with some sort of event or economic anomaly. There are no free lunches and many, including I, argue that there will be unintended consequences that will come from everything the fed/treasury has done to stem this crisis. I'm sure the fed is watching, but I would not expect them to announce any increase in planned treasury purchases until their next rate decision meeting.
Is the treasury market signaling growth ahead? No, and
I think PIMCO's CEO Mohammed El-Erian hit it perfectly yesterday:
"Your getting a lot of warning signs about this massive move we had in the 10YR yields, from 2.90% a month ago to 3.50% today, and that's not for good reasons, its for bad reasons. The market is starting to price in the enormous issuance and the fact that the treasury will have to lengthen its average maturity, when it comes to its debt. Secondly, the ratings news last week was worsened. And thirdly, importantly, people are starting to worry about potential inflation. They are starting to worry that the emergency liquidity is not going to b drained on a timely basis, because of political issues. The market is saying this is a very delicate time, and that it is very important that it is navigated well bot by policy makers and by investors."Spot on. Higher rates could very well be the 'new normal' that we will have to get used to and it is entirely possible that we have already experienced the lowest lending rates we will see in the next decade. This is an unintended consequence of policy actions taken to stem this crisis. In my opinion, this is NOT the treasury market signaling future growth via a sharp economic recovery. Any inflation we see to start, will not be the kind that is associated with higher wages and higher asset prices - a symptom of an overheating economy. Rather, to start, I believe inflation will show up mostly in food, energy, metals, health care, etc., the stuff that shrinks profit margins and squeezes consumers wallets. The question is, what does our fed do next to combat this problem and how does that play a role in crimping growth? And for how long?
Hyperinflationists are screaming that real estate is the place to go to protect yourself from the ginormous piles of money the fed is printing that will eventual send inflation to the roof. I am not in this camp and would rather be in gold to protect against a possibility like this.
Here are my reasons:
1) Deflation will negate some Inflation - people seem to forget that we are experiencing deflation right now, and the damage has been done. Asset vales have fallen, trillions in securitized mortgage bonds losses, stock portfolios have been murdered, unemployment is soaring, debts are rising, bankruptcies are surging, and in general most people have seen a significant hit to their total net worth over the past few years whether it be from equities, falling home values, loss of job, or other form of distress associated with this slowdown. People are saving again and getting frugal after being whacked by a 2x4 by housing market forces. The initial wave of inflation will cancel out the deflation we are currently experiencing, and for all I know this stage may be occurring right now.
2) Government will understate inflation to protect Social Security - people seem to forget the govt's tendency to understate inflation when it seems to be rising and overstating inflation when it seems to be falling. Should inflation become the hyper variety, the cost of living formula for Social Security would have to be adjusted sending higher checks to recipients and putting massive pressure on the new date that the fund will be depleted. Hard to see the gov't releasing inflation data that causes such mass problems on this front, but thats just me.
3) Rates will surge if hyperinflation ensues - umm, if hyperinflation ensues, lending rates will surge. Can you imagine how affordability will be affected if a 30YR mortgage rate is 9% or 10% or higher? It happened before, and those that say it can never happen again, well, I hope your right. But in this new world, unintended consequences may include higher rates for all of us. The question is, how high, and how does the economy/consumers adapt? Do not forget that ZIRP is still in full effect and we only have higher to go from here as the fed figures out an exit strategy.
4) Housing needs credit to boom to see prices skyrocket - umm, we just experienced a parabolic credit bubble that went bust. Among other factors, this played a HUGE role in the housing bubble and bust. We are at now now, just experienced this, and now watching our banks getting nursed back to health. We are about to see regulation come in to make sure this excess doesn't happen again. With underwriting standards much tighter and regulatory watchdogs coming, I don't see a repeat of 2003-2007, when money was just handed out to anybody with a pulse and exotic loan products allowing anyone to buy something way above their means. People seem to forget that we are in store for a new, less sexy normal, and instead they look at housing as a stock that can easily rebound ('V' recovery) after a substantial fall! Me, I think we are adjusting to where we should be had no bubble ever occurred. The problem is a bubble did occur and markets have a tendency of overshooting to the downside as equilibrium is ultimately reached. Many people will never look at housing, in terms of the asset class, the same again!
5) Wage inflation needs to occur to see prices rise - probably the most important element in terms of a housing recover. In order for housing to not only stabilize, but to recover and start seeing price increases, you need to see consumers earning more and a stronger jobs market. Now, yes, I think we are in the peak of the monthly job losses right now that will show declining losses going forward as the cycle plays out, but remember that an economy the size of ours should add about 150,000 jobs a month. We are far from that and right now we have millions unemployed. So lets not kid ourselves that wage inflation is a big concern right now. If people aren't earning, and current homeowners lost a ton of equity, where is the purchasing power going to come from to sustain general price appreciation? Yes, you will see savvy deals being done and money being made out of distressed purchases, but certainly nothing in terms of sustainable general increases across the nations local markets.
6) Destruction of wealth in shadow banking system negates most of the fed's money printing - probably the most important element here when looking at the fed's printing. The banks losses were astronomical, and they are the ones that are the biggest beneficiary of all the feds stimulus/printing. People tend to think the feds money printing is just entering the system, and all those dollars chasing too few goods will cause hyperinflation. But the deflationary destruction that hit the shadow banking system, is GREATER than the stimulus/printing the fed has done. So, imagine 2 stacks of money. Under one of these stacks is a deep money pit where the pile of cash falls into. Under the other is no hole at all. Our situation is the first of these scenarios, with most of the money filling the voids left by deflation in the shadow banking system - and not entering the system, at least not yet.
7) Money is being hoarded in excess reserves, which pays interest to banks, instead of flooding the system - (view image at St. Louis Fed) there was a reason the fed started paying interest on excess reserves back in SEPT of last year! Right when that announcement came, the banks started hoarding cash in excess reserves. This was one way the fed sterilized its actions so that money didn't flood the economy. The real question is what happens if/when this money does enter the system via bank loans, bringing the fractional reserve multiplier effect back into full force. This is one thing the fed will have to deal with later on. I would NOT be surprised at all to see the fed raise minimum capital requirements as part of their exit strategy to contain inflationary pressures of massive lending of newly printed dollars.
8) Too much money chasing too few properties? - many define inflation as too much money chasing too few goods. Well, if we are going to see housing fly because of hyperinflation, how does the fact that we have tons of oversupply fit into that equation? Do we expect future supply to stop coming in and future demand to just keep picking up? Lets be real here. The consumer is deleveraging now and this process can last a while to purge the excess and repair balance sheets! Plus, its not like sellers of homes today have so much equity built up that they have a whole new arsenal of buying power - in fact, the opposite occurred and homeowners equity is plunging. Looking at where we came from, we just experienced a parabolic credit / housing boom that saw over investment, overcapacity, overbuilding, whatever you want to call it. We have too much supply! I don't see a housing shortage in the future but I do see a peak in months of supply either being hit already or being very close, especially as short sales and foreclosure sales continue to surge as part of the natural order of markets. We are yet to see the high end jumbo prime problems really hit full force, and I defined this as part of the 'Wave 2' that is ahead of us:
WAVE 2 (yet to come) - perhaps sparked by commercial, prime, jumbo, HELOCs, credit card writedowns. How quickly we forget that the IMF recently upped their total global credit writedowns estimate to $4.1Trln - this assumes total US writedowns of $2.7Trln, up $500Bln from previous estimate (view image).Hyper-inflation is NOT a good thing! Was the 70s good? Yet I hear people arguing with such emotion, that housing will surge if hyper-inflation kicks in. I just don't see it and I explained why. Why anyone would want hyperinflation is beyond me. Buy a property because you are ready to buy a property and need a home, can afford to buy the property, your job is secure, because your an investor and the numbers make sense, because you are happy with the deal you are getting, etc.; not because you fear hyperinflation. Nevertheless, the voices are out there.
Ben had difficult choices to make: either one, face a modern day repeat of the Great Depression or two, inflate our way out of it and worry later about letting the genie out of the bottle. He picked the latter. Only history will decide what road was the better one to have taken. We are, however, on a path to rising inflation at a time when incomes are not growing and unemployment is high - for now, deflation is still the battle with signs that Ben's inflating is working. Hyperinflation, if it comes, will wipe people of their cash. The cost of living will go through the roof. Business margins will be diminished and may businesses will fail. Unemployment will therefore see increased pressures. This can contribute to the escalating delinquencies in housing, credit cards, car loans, etc.. Banks, however, will benefit from spreads but hurt in potential future losses. Yields in the term markets will be so high and short term rates so low that banks will make a fortune on spreads - part of the plan? If hyperinflation hits, mortgage rates could resemble the deep double digits of the 1970's, great for banks but horrible for housing - again, I don't see this happening but is certainly possible if hyperinflation occurs. Is this why hyperinflation worriers bought real estate to hedge against? Not until the federal reserve steps in to stabilize the dollar by tightening will the long end come down and that is years away.
I know this is a touchy subject, and the following are my thoughts only. Everyone has their opinions, and I would love to hear yours even if it is outright the opposite of mine. We are all in this together!



Posted by brenda
Thu May 28th, 2009 12:45 PM
noah, great post. the only thing that i'd add is that along with job losses, we are seeing wage deflation among the employed. employers are cutting wages across the board, and from what i've read, it's extremely difficult to reverse deflationary wage trends. Once it starts it tends to spread like wildfire.
Posted by Noah
Thu May 28th, 2009 12:47 PM
yep - reading about that too Brenda! Certainly we have some time to go to purge the excess and the cycle is basically an adverse feedback loop, with one problem causing another until we get cleansed and fundamentals start to improve.
thanks!
Posted by In Debt We Trust
Thu May 28th, 2009 02:23 PM
Yup. #2 and #5 are spot on. The Fed has a history of marginalizing real inflation in favor of "core inflation", e.g. all the things that are too touchy to mention like food, energy, and rent which together probably make up 60% of the avg American's monthly budget (the rest goes towards paying off existing debt).
Combine that w/your other factors and we have the recipe for a perfect storm - which should be the last stage of your theory: govt price controls.
I've rented part of a warehouse in upper NYC and begun stockpiling bags of rice, dry beans, and corn in anticipation of such an event.
Posted by lars
Thu May 28th, 2009 03:01 PM
I completely agree with your overall observation.
As far as real estate goes, points 3 and 5 are key to why inflation will not find its way into real estate any time soon.
Posted by lars
Thu May 28th, 2009 03:08 PM
Noah,
The only other comment I would make is that we may be at Stage 10, but if we are, we are likely to relive a bunch of the earlier stages again in order.
The crisis is no where near an end, IMHO. You will know when that is by the fact that rates are normalized/market driven and the FED alphabet soup programs are only a distant bad memory.
Posted by Noah
Thu May 28th, 2009 03:11 PM
yes, its a very good point and I agree. People are discounting way too much that credit markets are not going back to where they were. Now I agree that collapse is off the table, and that is worth a lot, but credit markets can see another rough patch if WAVE 2 items come out and marks are shown to be way way off. Which I think is a very good possibility.
TALF, PPIP have their issues. What happens with these may pave way for what happens next
Posted by Nobi
Thu May 28th, 2009 05:01 PM
Hey Noah,
Sorry its been a while, but I've been reading the whole time.
So... its time to buy more gold, then.
Posted by Noah
Thu May 28th, 2009 05:21 PM
Hey Nobi - well, Ill never tell you when to enter or exit. Thats for you to decide. I have been bullish on gold publicly hear since mid 2007 though, in the mid 600s. Long term, yes I like the play, but short term, who knows, it can easily fall way down before the breakout
Posted by iven
Thu May 28th, 2009 09:20 PM
Noah, Great piece well summarized. The only aspect I would add relates to the following comment:
"Hyperinflation, if it comes, will wipe people of their cash"
Short term rates will move up as well, and cash will be rewarded with high interest rates. I'm guessing what you were referring to is high cost of goods to buy at the supermarket for example.
If I was to infer would the appropriate investments if your thesis is correct be GLD, TBT, DBC, mixed in with foreign currencies?
Alot of this has already moved. Seems risky to chase if you are not in already, but a small correction would be an opportunity for the larger trend over the next few years.
Expect the unexpected.
Posted by Out there looking
Thu May 28th, 2009 09:35 PM
Inflation based on currency devaluation (aka money printing) is a double edged sword when it comes to real estate. If it is coupled with lots of Quantitative easing, it may restrain interest rates (benefitting 'value') but it will also drive operating costs up which diminishes profitability.
If the local job market is growing more slowly than the rate of cost increase, profits will drop and the value of the house in Real dollars will go down even if it goes up in Nominal price.
Homes are just licenses to work in a certain labor market. Think of them like taxi medallions. If there are less customers out there, it doesn't help to have a fare increase if it comes with an even greater increase the price of gasoline and replacement parts, not to mention the food you need to eat and the taxes you need to pay.
Because of this effect, eventually governments find 'jobless' inflations (aka Stagflation) very difficult to tolerate politically, so they tend to solve the problem with very high interest rates to regain control of the currency (opposite of printing). This will lower operating costs but of course destroy nominal real estate prices.
As a reminder, prices in Ginza (Tokyo) fell 90% from peak at the end of the Japan Real Estate bubble of the 1980s. An office building sold for $93,000 /sq ft at peak and just $1000/sq ft when it bottomed 10 years later.
Posted by mh23
Fri May 29th, 2009 08:00 AM
A very nice summation of our current situation and of potential problems in the future. Taking this information and using it as a means to devise a medium to long-term investment strategy leads me to the following conclusions:
1) GLD, SLV and GDX (I sold this on Tuesday after a great run, missed out on Wed and Thurs and bought back in on Thurs.) and other vehicles that give one exposure to precious medals. For the reasons that you have eloquently expounded on, right now precious metals are in favor due to the dislike of fiat currencies. As inflation creeps back into the picture, whenever that may be, they will be in favor for a different reason.
2) High quality cash-flow strong companies that will cater to what may be a multi-decade change in consumer behavior (WMT, MCD, TUP, etc.) As Mohamed states, there will be a new normal of frugality and thrift, which will serve to benefit companies that cater to that niche.
3) Commodities- Energy, Food, Base Metals. These will do well due their ability to serve as a place to invest money other than out of favor fiat currencies or US debt, and of course they too will do wel in an inflationary environment.
4) High quality munis. These will be the fixed income choice for the wealthy as we head into 2011. Right now yields are higher than treasuries, which is an historical aberration. The yield reflects great risk, coupled with a carry over of risk-aversion, thus requiring high yields to entice investors. As we head into 2011, and as the stimulus money flows through the states creating the appearance of recovery, the products will be in greater demand and the yields will fall back toward historical norms, providing states and munis with much needed cash. The main caveat is to only enter this space through the use of diversified funds that are comprised of exclusively AA or higher GO bonds.
As always Noah, your foresight and insight is appreciated and thought-provoking.
Posted by jeff
Fri May 29th, 2009 09:59 AM
Noah, I'm still long gold, in fact I added some a few weeks back. Interestingly, I see the struggle between inflation and deflation continuing for quite a while and cycling. There will be competition between bank lending getting tighter, wage deflation, increased savings rates, increased un-employment (albeit at a slowing rate), versus, government spending programs and inventory replenishment. Up next, a sell offf in equities as they catch down to bonds and the dollar. People will wonder why stocks are falling while GDP improves....but I don't see new lows. I do see a new high in gold and continued commodity price stability to increases as inventory is replenished and emerging economy rebounds suck up all the remaining flow of supply. To me the big thing is going to be a surging misery index. No jobs, no comp, high prices....little hope.
In Debt,
I confirmed that you can get the Bar Assoc course materials at a discount if you mention my name.
Posted by In Debt We Trust
Fri May 29th, 2009 02:44 PM
Thanks Jeff.
Posted by Thisson
Fri May 29th, 2009 03:00 PM
I just can't understand the rationale for being long in gold.
We are clearly in a deflationary environment. That means we should expect cash to go up in real value as it gets more scarce.
Moreover, we are seeing rising real interest rates. When real interest rates rise, gold usually goes down, because, among other things, the opportunity cost of holding and storing gold increases.
I would not be long gold here. I would be short gold, long the dollar, and keeping a lot of cash reserves, gaining any exposure through the options market.
Posted by Noah
Fri May 29th, 2009 03:54 PM
thisson - well, the last few times gold got to around this level, it proved to be a great short.
that said, Im long from mid 600s, and holding. The world needs another bubble, my bets on precious metals.
Posted by wall street
Mon Jun 1st, 2009 12:54 PM
at the root of it, what is inflation? why do we have it? serious question... let's assume we are still on a Gold Standard...so you can't use the printing money argument....why did we have inflation pre Nixon? what is inflation? what causes it? too many people chasing too few of resources? i don't get it.
Posted by wall street
Mon Jun 1st, 2009 12:54 PM
at the root of it, what is inflation? why do we have it? serious question... let's assume we are still on a Gold Standard...so you can't use the printing money argument....why did we have inflation pre Nixon? what is inflation? what causes it? too many people chasing too few of resources? i don't get it.
Posted by wall street
Mon Jun 1st, 2009 12:54 PM
at the root of it, what is inflation? why do we have it? serious question... let's assume we are still on a Gold Standard...so you can't use the printing money argument....why did we have inflation pre Nixon? what is inflation? what causes it? too many people chasing too few of resources? i don't get it.