Is the time ripe for REITs?
Yesterday one of our Urban Digs readers pointed out an interesting article from the Financial Times. The article notes that REIT prices in the U.K. have declined significantly below their net asset values and that these declines have exceeded the price declines of the underlying real estate that REITs own.
Just a quick review for newbies: A REIT is a tax advantaged vehicle for the ownership of real estate. It can be a private, essentially traded by appointment, or a public REIT with shares quoted on an exchange daily. The REIT is entitled to its tax advantage because it pays out 90% of its net income each year to shareholders. As a high income instrument, REIT's returns to shareholders are comprised of the substantial dividends they pay, topped off by any increase in the value of the stock. (The significant income component is not a new concept. The whole stock market was yield oriented years ago and much of the long-term returns of stocks are based on the dividend component).
There was a flurry of activity in the late 90s when many REITs came public. After a while the street worried that the capital they raised would be used to overbuild new properties and the REIT stocks tanked. This also coincided with the Asia crisis and some interruptions in capital market liquidity (yes this is not the first time that the CMBS market has gone kaflooey). Further, internet stocks were just starting to become all the rage, temporarily distracting folks from the value of big fat dividends. A big correction in REITs left valuations quite low. Taking their signal from the street, REIT managements pulled back on the development reigns and didn't significantly overbuild. This set up a major buying opportunity in the late 90s. For about six years thereafter my father in law thanked me for the heads up I gave him to this opportunity. Being an income seeking investor he loved the dividend increases he got.....and didn't mind the capital appreciation of the shares either, though he had no plans to sell them. Fast forward to today. My father in law won't speak to me....LOL....just kidding, he has actually hung in there and continued to clip his dividend coupons (until some recent dividend policy changes I will discuss shortly).
As most people know, REIT stocks have been shellackered as the markets began to anticipate the seriousness of the commercial real estate debacle that is now unfolding (View image). Recall, however, that, as stocks, REIT shares tend to anticipate the future. I commented on the REIT indicator back in January of 2008. At the time REIT stocks had begun to trade at significant discounts to their net asset values (NAVs). That is, the market caps of the companies began to fall well below the value of the properties they owned, less the debt on those properties (as well as corporate debt). The REIT indicator says that when this happens, the commercial real estate market is about to catch down to REIT prices. In the latest instance one can only say the REIT indicator was spot on in predicting a downturn in the commercial real estate cycle.
The REITs had a bit of an uptick late last year when many of them decided to pay their dividends in stock rather than cash (and the IRS deemed this strategy to be kosher). This demonstrated that liquidity risk was on the minds of investors as the shares appreciated despite the unappetizing prospect that this income instrument was going to pay in stock not cash. It probably helped that many folks were short the stocks and hoping they would go to zero. The efforts made by REIT managements to conserve cash pushed out that prospect at the very least, thus boosting REIT shares.
Lately REIT stocks have perked up again, particularly those that have been able to issue new equity. Stocks like Kimco Realty, Simon Property Group and AMB Property have issued shares in order to give themselves breathing room relative to upcoming debt maturities. The table below shows the REITs with the biggest debt maturities over the next couple of years, courtesy of an article that was published late last year by Commercial Real Estate News. These REITs were under some of the greatest price pressure and had large short positions because there was the potential that they would not be able to roll over maturing debt and end up defaulting.....this had little to do with the actual debt service capacity of the REITs in several cases. As noted in my recent piece Loan Extensions - Bridge to Nowhere, it appears that General Growth Properties, which was apparently able to service its debt, went under for just this reason.

Yesterday the Wall Street Journal ran a piece about how the U.S, vehicle of Israeli real estate investor, Chaim Katzman, Equity One, is apparently making aggressive moves towards shopping center REIT Ramco-Gershenson. In the article Rich Moore, analyst at RBC Capital, opines that according to his estimates an acquirer who took the company over at today's prices would be paying only a 12.7% cap rate for the underlying properties. Now according to Ramco's most recent 10K, the firm owned 89 properties, 86 of which were community shopping centers, 39% of which were in Michigan. It's key anchor tenants included (19) TJ Maxx at 3.6% of rents, (12) Publix at 2.9%, (4) Home Depot at 2.1%, (5) Wal Mart at 2.1% and (12) Office Max at 2%. Anchor tenenats constituted 51% of rents and Non-Anchors 49.3%. National chains were 68.4% and local retailers constituted 18.2% All-in-all not the best mix of assets (with the significant Michigan exposure), but not the worst either and likely pretty reasonably priced for whatever risk lies ahead at a 12.7% cap rate.
Interestingly, from what I hear shopping centers are selling today at cap rates around 7 - 8%, with PricewaterhouseCoopers Korpacz real estate investor survey reporting Q1 2009 cap rates for strip shopping centers at 7.63% up 14 basis points, with national power centers at 7.98% up 41 basis points. They project a rise of 25 to 125 basis points over the next 6 months for these assets. On that basis, Katzman's play seems to make some sense and depressed REIT shares may start to become attractive to other investors. If there were a way to short commercial real estate and go long REITs I think you could make some real low risk money, this may actually be possible in Europe where there is a more active real estate derivatives market that I believe trades based on appraised values of a basket of buildings. Perhaps some Urban Digs reading macro hedge fund guys can tell us if this trade is actually feasible or could even be pulled off some other way.



Comments (11)
Here is the UK update. No major legislative changes there:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/
budget/5202862/Property-industry-condemns-Darling-
as-pleas-are-ignored-in-Budget-2009.html
Posted by In Debt We Trust | April 23, 2009 7:53 PM
The interesting aspect of these transactions is that the debt underwriters of some of the REITs were also the stock underwriters. I have to ask you, do you think that there is enough upside in the stock valuations of REITs to warrant the risk of another GGP?
Posted by MeekSheep | April 23, 2009 11:52 PM
Meek,
I have not done the bottoms up work on specific REITs to answer with confidence which ones have enough upside to create a good risk reward, but the info above is prompting me to start. I definitely agree with the logic, as sketched out above, that investors should be gravitating towards well financed REITs before they start buying commercial properties directly. I will be looking at REITs without significant maturity default risk as a way to play here. Importantly, relative to residential property, commercial property, ex-land, pays income. Therefore timing the exact bottom is less important, you get paid to wait, rather than paying to carry. As long as you buy property with a low enough LTV, so that you don't have to worry about the ability to service debt you can afford to be a little early. I don't think valuations on commercial real estate have gotten compelling yet, but even here the industry publications are talking about players gearing up to start buying in the 2nd half. If that's the case buying REITs soon may be a very good call.
Posted by jeff | April 24, 2009 8:54 AM
Jeff,
How about buying SPG or VNO / SLG ( would be carefull with NYC) and then getting some SRS ( Double ultra short CR)
Posted by johnny | April 24, 2009 11:28 AM
Hi Jeff,
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/04/guest-post-open-letter-to-sec-regarding.html
If you haven't seen this yet, you might find it interesting. From Durden at ZeroHedge:
Posted by brenda | April 24, 2009 12:13 PM
Brenda,
I did not see the article and it's a goodie. My comment is this. While I am not intimate with the results of any of these REITs, they are all making money and few have defaulted on any loans that weren't maturing, RE they are paying on their loans. The major near term risks are maturity default risks....can't find a new lender to replace the old. Why aren't old lenders re-upping. You could guess that it's because they "know" these REITs are going bust imminently or it could be they need the cash to cover all the debts that are already known to be bad. My guess is that it's the latter. The biggest risk to commercial banks from real estate in my opinion is, in severity order, from 1) CMBS paper, 2)whole loans they made a) land b)construction and then c) income producing property and 3) REIT loans. So while they very well may be cashing out their loans to REITs and stuffing dumb equity investors using puff research, my guess is its because this is one of the only areas they can cash out of, because there is a little liquidity and they can get out at par.
Posted by jeff | April 24, 2009 1:21 PM
Just a couple of clarifications for those who care. First, I pose the title of this piece as a question, because I like the logic of REITs bottoming 6 months or so before property markets (currently in freefall). Second, this piece refers to property REITs not mortgage REITs. In fact a great play might be shorting commercial mortgage REITs and buying property REITs. Commercial mortgage REITs will be suffering defaults and severe losses on individual loans they made on commercial real estate, particularly for land, construction and purchase/repositioning and any mezz financing they did. In contrast many property REITs, if they can get past their maturity default risks will muddle through due to plain jane stabilized asset portfolios and reasonable capital structures that went along with the significant focus on paying out the bulk of their net income.
Posted by jeff | April 24, 2009 3:25 PM
In this case why not look at Brandywine? They have 4 billion of unencombered properties (i.e. non-mortgaged) to use as collateral to pay off upcoming debt maturities. You might like the equity but I'm looking at 10% YTM on the debt.
Posted by MeekSheep | April 24, 2009 6:56 PM
I find it hard to believe that strip malls are really selling for 7.5 cap rates in this market. especially when investment grade bonds are yielding much more than that. the hancock building in boston which is one of the best buildings in the city was just sold for 60% of peak price. and rents on most mall properties are going down, not up. i would question the accuracy of that data, because i would imagine that cap rates are going to go up to more like 9-10.
Posted by Eric | April 24, 2009 7:38 PM
Here is the link to the recent sale of the building in Boston. How on earth would stip malls really be trading at 7 cap rates when prime office space is being sold at half off 2006 prices with no buyers?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aWk_9IaE4pdI&refer=us
Posted by Eric | April 24, 2009 7:42 PM
Just curious if you guys have encountered any shady characters looking to buy:
http://debtsofanation.blogspot.com/2009/04/
debts-of-spenders-mafia-experiences.html
Posted by In Debt We Trust | April 25, 2009 3:53 PM