Broker State-of-Market Comments - Manhattan Real Estate
A: Want to have a quick discussion on what brokers see out there and provide some of my feelings on this market today and looking foward. It's best to do this every once in a while, because what I see and discuss here is only a very tiny crack of the overall picture. The market is way too big for me to accurately interpret on my own. Mainly, I am looking at how this market reacted to the first stage down and what buyers are thinking as we head closer to summer. If there is one takeaway I can come up with, it is that buyers are still lacking motivation to submit aggressive bids. Forgetting for a moment why they are lacking this motivation, what does this mean for sales volume as we enter the normally slower summer months. Will we see a spike month to month that is interpreted too optimistically? Or will we see continuing negative data/headlines that enhance these distractions to buy side mindsets? Will the comfort zone hold? Lets do a quick check around the brokerage community (sorry, only got 4 colleagues to participate here), and see what brokers are saying about today's Manhattan real estate marketplace.
Todd Stevens, Senior VP, Douglas Elliman
QUOTE: "The market would quickly get better if all realtors demanded checking account statements of 20% price of each home's price from any buyer that’s wants to view a property. For Harlem, Mayor Bloomberg just needs to demand 125th Street vacant building and land owners to build or be triple-taxed. With these demands, the buyer demand will indirectly have a quick rise."
Rosemarie Deane, Senior VP, Halstead Property
QUOTE: "I see the market coming back to life. Phones are ringing, agents are running out to show properties. Sellers are becoming more grounded, accepting the new reality of lower prices. Deals are being made at 5%-27% off summer 2008 prices. The savvy buyers are buying now."
Christine Toes, VP/Associate Broker, Corcoran
QUOTE: "Buyers and sellers are still 10% apart on price. There are a lot of buyers are getting into the market but they're all hoping to buy at the "bottom" and no one knows where that is. Some people think there will be a gradual leveling out / increase in prices after the "bottom." But with all of this buyer activity (I speak mostly of the under $1.5M market), it's possible that there could be more of a U shaped curve where a lot of buyers who are trying to get in while rates are low may jump in at once. Only time will tell."
Broker I Know & Trust Who Chose To Remain Anonymous
QUOTE: "Deals - Deals are being done but they are moving very slowly. That's not such a bad thing - buying your home is a major investment and it was crazy trying to do a deal from the middle of a stampede like the 2007- 2008 market. The starter end of the market is the most active and the top end is the softest. Buyers - The downside for my buyers is that it is more difficult to get a mortgage and the financing process takes longer. In this market, it's crucial for buyers to get a handle on the financing side even before they start their search. On the upside, I can now show buyers a better selection of apartments than I could have done at any other time over the past four years. I'm definitely seeing a trend of renters, who felt locked out of the Manhattan property market over the last years, finally seeing this as their opportunity to own their home. Sellers - My sellers are being realistic about pricing - since early 2008 I have been refusing to work with sellers who aren't. There are opportunities but it requires realistic buyers and realistic sellers - both of whom are negotiating from solidly researched data points."
UrbanDigs Two Cents: I think the Manhattan real estate market hit a comfort zone in its first initial snap down move from peak trades, during the first four months of 2009. Moving ahead, lets get a bit detailed and see how things may play out in medium term as the process continues.
As I noted before, this is a high end recession for our local marketplace due to the nature of the crisis that we are dealing with. The high end market is significantly more illiquid than the sub $1M market, and therefore you will see the sharpest price declines from peak occurring in that segment of the market. This leads me to believe that at some point in the next few quarters you will see a bunch of quality Classic 6s, 7s, and 8s, looking mighty attractive!
Right now, do not be surprised to see some high end or even mid/high end properties trade for up to 35-40% below peak - as a seller feels no choice but to hit a bid. The problem is that almost all buyers expect to get a deal in that range regardless of price point and property features; and that is just not the conditions that this market is operating under right now. Not all, but many buyers want protection against future downside risk and are pricing that into bids. This explains the disconnect between buyers & sellers that I mentioned before - buyers are picky and patient if they don't get their price & terms. Even though a price point seems to be trading down X% from peak, that is not to say a seller is eager to hit the bid that comes in around that level!
The fact that this market is quite active right now could lead to a sell side unintended consequence because it is happening at the same time that buyer confidence is still depressed. Crazy right, but hear me out. What I mean is, there is a lot of foot traffic for my listings and I am setting up a lot of private appointments for my buyer clients - but buyers are still patient. Brokers I talk to are reporting a similar trend across the board; with some agents doing many deals, but more agents doing fewer.
Now, take this environment a step further to see the issue that it may cause. Sell side brokers are seeing this activity and passing along the feedback to their seller clients. This affects sell side psychology - how could it not! So, if a 3M property is trading in this market down 25-30% or so and that is where the most willing & able bids are coming in at, the seller's motivation to hit that bid may get muted by feedback of increased activity that is accurately being reported by the listing agent. Hope sets in that perhaps tomorrow will bring a stronger bid, making the seller less motivated to 'hit a bid' that otherwise represents exactly where the market seems to be trading right now! The point is a psychological one: reports of higher traffic give the seller one reason to expect more because of where this market has come from in the past 8 months.
Focusing on the sell side, the problem I see is one of timing and where we are in the seasonal aspect of this market. If a seller is serious and needs to sell or really wants to sell, they should be very cognizant of the fact that we are rapidly approaching summer when traffic usually slows dramatically! Do not ignore a bid just because you think higher traffic will produce a higher offer in the near future. For stocks, the saying goes, "Sell in May & Go Away" - well, one could argue that saying should also apply for sales in Manhattan. Whereas an open house today might procure 10+ prospective buyers, once we get into JUNE/JULY/AUG that usually falls closer to 2-3 prospective buyers; unless of course the price is uber-aggressive compared to competition in the price point - something most sellers hope to avoid. It's hard to sell a property when traffic is light. So, my view is that this countertrend pickup in activity (which is mostly foot traffic and not a surge in contracts signed) will not last for much longer. Once we enter the slower summer months, history will probably repeat itself and this market could get significantly more illiquid; similar to what the 4th quarter of 2008 saw and bad news for anyone that must sell. If this seasonal component proves correct, serious sellers will find it even more difficult than it is now and that may ultimately mean a bid will have to be hit. Therefore, I think the latter half of the 2nd quarter all the way up to the 4th quarter will show continuing sluggish sales volume and perhaps the second wave of adjustments in pricing that is only proven after the fact. Time will tell. Nothing moves in a straight line and there will be deals at every price along the way. By the end of the 4th quarter of 2009 and more likely the 1st quarter of 2010, I think the bulk of the adjustment will be complete - unless the world changes again by some unforeseen event.
For now, just like stocks had countertrend bear rallies embedded in a larger move downward, I think Manhattan real estate will follow a similar pattern until pricing is more in line with trending macro fundamentals, incomes/affordability, and price/rent ratios sparking buy-side demand - basically, the new world. To visualize this, I plotted a chart of the DOW since the beginning of this crisis to show you the bigger trend, and embedded inside that a number of countertrend rallies that brought with it both hope and bottom calls:

Some macro/psychological factors that I think will power the continuation of this adjustment process for our local market include:
1) rising unemployment
2) rising taxes & maintenance / city budget issues
3) rising inventory / sluggish sales volume
4) local auctions
5) deteriorating commercial sector / empty retail spaces
6) zombie condos / lawsuits against developers
7) household deleveraging / selling because you are forced to - many will do anything to avoid the decision to sell their home, and sometimes that emotion works to build an uglier situation down the road
Its hard to argue these forces although I am way less bearish today than I was only a year ago on Manhattan real estate because the process is happening. It must happen. It will happen. And we will get through it! I look forward to the day that I can say with clarity the worst is already behind us. For now, lets keep it real.



Posted by paul.b
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 01:57 PM
It sounds to me, Noah, that as time goes on you are getting more and more bullish. I know you argued for a longer recession though in a past blog article.
Posted by Fred
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:06 PM
If the stock market typically looks forward 12 months and assuming we are at a stock market bottoming (which sure seems like it - can't make money any longer on those 10% swings either way!), then Manhattan real estate will be beginning a bottoming process this time next year. When someone tells you that you can't call a bottom in a down market, it's usually used as a fear tactic to move you off center. On the flip side, it would be nice to know when these brokers started calling the top in the market and advising clients to wait to buy or for those invested to hurry up and sell if they had any desire to get liquid in less than five years? Ummmmm, did I just hear a pin drop?
Posted by Noah
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:09 PM
"On the flip side, it would be nice to know when these brokers started calling the top in the market and advising clients to wait to buy"
Ha! In a commission based business, that don't jive well!
Posted by James
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:21 PM
I don't understand this checking account comment from Todd Stevens. Is he saying he is too busy showing apartments to people who can't afford to pay asking price, even though the eventual sale price might be 25% less than asking? Does he think only showing an apartment to people with means to overpay will cause a market to "quickly get better"? And does "get better" mean for him or for the person he's representing?
This man sounds like a real creep unless it was just a poorly phrased comment.
Posted by lars
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:23 PM
Noah,
Good analysis, but I think you maybe too optimistic.
I think the issue that is still underappreciated is the impact of Wall Street, both in terms of levels of future income and employment. It is the elephant in the room; and, it is very difficult to really understand how the changes on the Street are going to impact the near-medium term values of real estate. I suspect that the downward pressure of lost jobs/wages is still in its infancy (many are still holding on and haven’t bitten the bullet on adjusting lifestyles downward).
So will Manhattan prices bottom by 4th qtr ’09 or 1st qtr ’10? I think this will only be true if prices continue a steep decline over the next several months.
An article stating the obvious about Street profitability going forward:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-04-15/the-era-of-high-profits-is-over/
Posted by Anon
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:26 PM
One of these quotes just illustrates how out of touch with reality some brokers are. You know which one.
Posted by Fred
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:27 PM
James - I imagine Noah is being polite about Todd's comment, which was stupid and most likely taken out of an even more absurd context. He clearly doesn't get the fact that its the cost of debt financing that drives all of this. Triple taxing some vacant bldg's owner is going to somehow make the buyer market wake up and bid on overvalued real estate? If it was that simple, why not just double taxes on everyone and then like magic, over zealous buyers will flood Manhattan just so they can demonstrate proof of funds to bid on Todd's listings!
Posted by Noah
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:32 PM
lars - excellent point, which is why I stayed away from using the term 'BOTTOM'. When I talk about a bottom, trust me, the title will blast it out.
In this piece, the thinking is that the bulk of the correction will have taken place by this time next year; in my opinion. Its happening very fast so think about 12 months from now if this keeps up.
After that I see a muddled L like market for years, mainly for reasons you mention.
Posted by Noah
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:37 PM
Fred - I interpreted that to mean that Bloomberg should threaten to penalize the owners of vacant lots as an incentive to build it or sell it to a developer that will build, because undeveloped lots in that area are hurting the general market there. That is how I interpreted that at first. Not sure about the checking acct statement.
Posted by lars
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:46 PM
Noah,
I guess what I am staying is that for the bulk of the correction to be over by this time next year, prices are going to have to drop significantly MORE over the next twelve months. Perhaps has much as they have dropped in the last twelve months (so another 20 to 30%).
Not sure I got that was your view. And I certainly did not get it from the quoted brokers.
Of course, my crystal ball is no better than the next guy’s. But I think the correction got started late in NYC and will go longer than other areas of the country for all the reasons you have discussed.
Posted by Noah
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 02:51 PM
lars - without putting specific numbers on it, I would say I AGREE! Im hearing of some deals already trading at 35-40% off peak, today! Higher end though and just stories for now until I see the deals close and compare myself. Can a $5M peak property sale hit a $3M bid today?
Posted by lars
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 03:12 PM
Noah,
Glad to see you haven't been pulled to the darkside. Keep drinking green tea and stay away from the kool-aid. :-)
Posted by cfranch
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 03:38 PM
I think a newly bullish stock market is, at the least, not going to help NYC RE and, at the worst, will hurt NYC RE. To assume Wall St. will return to it's heyday of big bonuses because we have rallied off the lows is foolish. Without those bonuses there is nothing to hold up the high end of the RE market. This past decade has seen two stock market crashes, a commodities boom and bust and a housing boom and bust. Many people lost lots of money. Retirement accounts have gone nowhere in 10 years. I think most people are looking to repair their household balance sheets, particularly baby boomers. As the stock market rally continues I see most people buying a rising asset they view as cheap(stocks) rather than a falling asset they view as expensive(RE). To most folks Citigroup at $4 looks like a much better bet than a million dollar tribeca one bedroom.
Posted by Donald
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 03:50 PM
Triple taxing vacant buildigns makes absolutely no sense. If the city does that, the owners will just abandon or torch the buildings like they did in the Bronx during the 70s.
Posted by JKD
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 03:58 PM
Apols in advance for the rant...
There is a certain logic to buying into a bubble while it is still inflating, so long as the plan is to eventually get out. If you buy into the claptrap about it being "different this time" and income/price and rent/price ratios just don't matter any more, then you are just not being smart.
If, however, you buy into a bubble on the way down AFTER it has popped, well now that is just a special kind of stupid. How brainwashed people must be to cling so tightly to their delusions that they can't see what is right in front of their faces.
There is an absolutely zero percent chance prices won't be lower and inventory much higher next year, absolutely ZERO!
These Realtors cannot possibly be this stupid but I see no other explanation. It can't be the commissions, commissions come from higher sales and higher sales will only come from LOWER prices. Just look at California, this is not debatable, it is a fact.
Buying at the leading edge of a popping bubble, truely absurd...
John
Posted by Neophiliac
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 04:58 PM
Traffic is up but the inventory keeps on above 11,000. And spring is SUPPOSED to be active, no? So if there is not even a moderate clearing inventory during this generally active time of the year, how do we think the rest of the year will be like? We can talk about marker bottoming out once we see some of this inventory clearing.
Posted by Noah
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 05:17 PM
Neophiliac - Exactly why I said...
"So, my view is that this countertrend pickup in activity (which is mostly foot traffic and not a surge in contracts signed) will not last for much longer. Once we enter the slower summer months, history will probably repeat itself and this market could get significantly more illiquid; similar to what the 4th quarter of 2008 saw and bad news for anyone that must sell. If this seasonal component proves correct, serious sellers will find it even more difficult than it is now and that may ultimately mean a bid will have to be hit."
Posted by anonymous
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 05:25 PM
i don't see any improvement where i have been looking in the manhattan valley -morningside heights area - i have been looking closely for a 1200/1300 sq ft apt for 1m or less for 5 months, and aside for a very nice place at 370 RSD that contracted for 995k and a place at 111/Amst. that contracted for 945K, there has been very little in terms of reduction of prices for this type of place - its the same listings, day after day even though it is clear that nobody is interested in these places at the prices being listed
Posted by lars
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 05:56 PM
Anonymous | April 16, 2009 5:25 PM
Wait until the dam breaks, which it will to the detriment of prices...
Posted by realist
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 08:16 PM
After reading the today's rants about the Rushmore on Curbed and Streeteasy, it's hard to be anything but bearish on Manhattan RE.
It appears that thousands of Manhattan condos will eventually be auctioned off by lenders in the next year or two. This will swamp the market, driving all prices lower.
Posted by MeekSheep
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 08:47 PM
Have to agree with most of your assessment Noah. How much of the positive wealth effect is the current stock market having on buy side participants? Do people understand that it is a low volume rally or do they just think the "worst" is over? Or is it the hint of TARP repayment and with that more "flexibility" in salaries?
Posted by Tony
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 08:49 PM
lars
When do you expect the dam to break?
Posted by lars
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 10:33 PM
Tony,
Not to be a smart ass, but when sellers finally capitulate. When will that be... I am not certain. Noah's 12 month time frame may be correct. All I know is it will happen because the outlook for real estate is problematic.
The second shoe to drop on medium term outlook for real estate is interest rates. Today, rates are artificially low. If this continues, it means the economy is bad and there hasn't been growth in employment or wages. If the economy does turn around, interest rates will increase. You hear pundits say inflation will be good for real estate. I disagree because the increase in mortgage rates will more than offset any gains.
So either way, the medium term outlook is not good for real estate.
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 11:11 PM
"although I am way less bearish today than I was only a year ago on Manhattan real estate because the process is happening."
I think you mean only a month ago? It's funny what a seasonal uptick does for the psyche. ;-) Let's hope for some mortgage market investor confidence for the jumbo sector - conventional seems to be moving in the right direction.
Posted by Jonathan J. Miller
Thu Apr 16th, 2009 11:11 PM
"although I am way less bearish today than I was only a year ago on Manhattan real estate because the process is happening."
I think you mean only a month ago? It's funny what a seasonal uptick does for the psyche. ;-) Let's hope for some mortgage market investor confidence for the jumbo sector - conventional seems to be moving in the right direction.
Posted by The What
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 02:49 AM
We are in a depression dumbasses! You will never see this type of speculation again...
The What
Someday this war is gonna end...
Posted by Noah
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 07:33 AM
Hey JM!! Amazing what a bear rally can do to psych right? But No, I actually meant a year ago, in April 2008 the downturn barely started and deals were still being signed close to peak levels. Sure there was concern and sales volume started to dry up, but if we look at deals done in early 2008 and closd by summer, they are near peak levels..maybe 5% off. The dislocation was big between macro forces and deals happening here at that time.
I knew that all the forces were bubbling over and the process was yet to hit Manhattan. Sometimes it just needs a spark and you cant time that. In our case, it seemed to be the fall of Lehman. Then we cliff dove.
I actually do NOT buy into this bear rally. It reminds of last year at this time AFTER Bear was rescued and everyone thought systemic risk was removed and markets rallied close to 13,000 or so. I was scratching my head in disbelief. This time around, I do see rally lasting a bit longer, but I scratch my head again.
i think we got the severity right, but nt the duration. This debt deflation will last years, and Im less bearish on Manhattan because we already had the first leg down. Im still bearish, because I see another leg down over the course of the next 6-12 months. By this time next year, I think market will have experienced the bulk of the adjustment. Right now, I dont think we have.
Thanks for comment JM!!
Posted by Out there looking
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 07:38 AM
"Not to be a smart ass, but when sellers finally capitulate. When will that be... I am not certain. Noah's 12 month time frame may be correct. All I know is it will happen because the outlook for real estate is problematic."
Lars - many factors need to be considered in this question of timing. Here are just a few.
1) Seller psychology: Sellers need to blow an entire year waiting for the market to not hit their ask before they get the right pricing signals. There is always an excuse around the corner, starting with 'wait until bonus season' to 'let's get another broker who is better' and finally ending with 'oh crap it's been 2 brokers and 2 bonus seasons and it still hasn't sold, maybe the problem is the price . . ?'
2) Sell to buy chain: Most prospective buyers need to sell the home they are in to buy the one they want. Only a few are renters who are patiently waiting. Most buyers-sellers are afraid to sell their existing home low (or in a short sale scenario) because they are not seeing the pricing signals in the home they want to buy showing as low a price as the price they need to hit to sell what they are in. Once this chain is connected, you will see unbelievably swift drops in price. When sellers are forced into naked capitulation, prospective buyer-sellers seeing the pricing signals will feel confident that they can dump their existing homes for low prices and buy a bargain on the other end. In fact, they won't want to miss out on the buying opportunity so they will become hasty to sell.
3) Trailing Indicators and No Marks: Many buildings have not even had a sale in the last 6 months, so Sellers have no way to judge the marked value of their assets. They are simply not willing to believe the pure buy:rent analysis because the loss they need to take is too large to imagine and they did not base their own purchase on buy:rent. They really need to see a unit in their building of comparable size and type sell for $/sf and they will then know to lower their price to that number. Right now everyone is basing asking price off of what others in their building are asking, even though there have been no takers for these asking prices. Also, pricing data lags, so people have not seen the results of the few recent transactions (which will show further declines). Again, this will take a while to show up in black and white for sellers.
So all in all, this is going to take until "NoBonus II, the January 2010 edition" to shake down to something like reality. Keep your eyes on the market lars, but you have a right to be 'picky and patient.' If the price doesn't work for you based on YOUR expectations of appreciation and relative rental values and tax implications, just rent! The market is not going to pass you by during the 12 months of your lease.
Posted by iven
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 08:32 AM
Talk about not being open minded. Realtors still talking the same game. I dont think its outright deception. People just have a hard time seeing that things change. We just assume the recent past will also be the near future. People cannot see Oil at $140 or $35 or equities down 50%.
Point is keep an open mind, things change quickly, and NYC residential real-estate can fall an additional 50% from here. If you have done your homework and conclude it wont, thats ok. My evidence points that it will. Dont think it wont drop that much because it hasnt. Imagine its 1980 and your closed mind couldnt imagine property would go up 400% from that point.
Posted by Fred
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 09:26 AM
Jonathan - anectodal at best but we are in the process of listing a single family that belonged my grandmother in the midwest and the broker basically told us yesterday that the delays for both FHA and conventional loans for sub 200k home are getting longer and are still a moving target. i was a little shocked when she told us that underwriting is now taking 90 to 120 days at a minimum - so the moving target of actually getting a loan closed seems to be at all levels of price points. my sense is underwriting will not become relaxed for a long time and there will be a direct correlation between ease of mortgage money and transaction volume. the irony is we all just want to focus on prices when in reality prices are simply a phenomena of mortgage availability.
Posted by Rationalist
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 09:51 AM
Prices are still far above equilibrium fair value -- i.e., the point at which an investor would earn a reasonable return buying and renting this unit (or a similar one in the case of coops with rental restrictions).
So long as prices remain above that equilibrium point, shadow inventory includes every rental property in the city, and we can expect prices to drop over the medium term.
There are lots of people interested in buying. But rational buyers are not interested in overpaying.
Posted by Out there looking
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 10:16 AM
Rationalist:
Even in the worst of times in Manhattan (eg. 1982) mean reversion has been 20% above equilibrium value. Put otherwise, when Manhattan hits bottom, 20% down should buy the apartment and allow the comparable rent to carry the mortgage and expenses on an after-tax-benefits basis.
Still, I totally agree that current asking prices yield annual ownership costs which are generally 40% to 300% above equilibrium value. In most cases deep price cuts are needed to get the apartment within that crucial range where buyers think they are not wasting their time bidding on a seller's overpriced unit.
Posted by Crosby
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 11:11 AM
Noah -
Where do you see average/median sales per square foot going? I saw an interesting Case/Shiller graph recently. But it wasn't Manhattan specific. It was the entire country. But if Manhattan does follow the rest of the country, we are looking at an average between $500 - $550 per square foot. Doesn't seem possible.
Posted by Don
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 11:13 AM
If you buy now you are paying more than you will have to a year from now (maybe even 2 years from now or more). Maybe that is ok with you (location, apartment is perfect etc and you have the funds and can wait A LONG TIME and will never HAVE to sell). BUT prices are still going down, and when they do bottom they will stay a lot closer to that bottom price (for quite a while) than they will to any price you pay today. Be patient and wait for the fundamentals to make sense - and then wait a little longer.
Posted by lars
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 11:59 AM
Out there looking,
I do not disagree with your observations. I think your second point is a good one and tends to be overlooked (more emphasis is given to one).
First qtr. of 2010 jives with Noah's thoughts as well. Moreover, if you look at other markets that have substantially corrected already (CA and FL) two years seems to be the time frame for bulk of adjustments in this correction.
My hesitation in making estimates on timing issues is twofold: first, the financial crisis as a whole went on much longer than I expected (so never underestimate human stupidity) and second, never underestimate the politicians' desire to avoid/postpone the correction through stupid policy.
Still, I am of a view the housing market is too big for the government to avoid it correcting (but they can slow the process down).
Posted by lars
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 12:02 PM
Opps. The 3rd para should have read: My hesitation in making estimates on timing issues is twofold: first, the LEAD UP TO THE financial crisis as a whole went on much longer than I expected (so never underestimate human stupidity) and second, never underestimate the politicians' desire to avoid/postpone the correction through stupid policy.
Posted by In Debt We Trust
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 02:25 PM
There is an argument that can be made that the market (equities and real estate) will keep going up until the Fed reduces its balance sheet. . . . whenever that is. I don't really buy into that kind of thinking but then again we've seen a lot of incredible things these past 5 weeks - like a stock market rally built on air.
Posted by Out there looking
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 02:32 PM
"If you buy now you are paying more than you will have to a year from now"
Don, while I get what you are trying to say, inherently there is a flaw in your statement. Perhaps if you buy now at someone's inflated asking price, you are paying more than you will pay next year. However there is no such thing as a 'wrong time' to buy if you are paying the right price for the apartment. If someone is offering at a price 50% more than rent:buy equilibrium, and tomorrow you offer at equilibrium and your bid is accepted you are paying the right price and you will not get it for less next year. Remember, rental rates react to the market almost immediately, as Landlords have no reason to waste a month of earnings (8% discount) holding on to an inflated rental price.
Posted by Native UWSider
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 03:00 PM
Out there looking,
I'm not sure where you got that 20% above equilibrium value figure, but having grown up here I can tell you that your numbers are not conservative enough.
After the Great Depression, and in the 70's, the swing in prices was much greater than 20%.
Posted by Rosemarie's Baby
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 03:16 PM
Todd Stevens, Senior VP, Douglas Elliman, Hates buyers and thinks they're all just wasting his time.
Rosemarie Deane, Senior VP, Halstead Property, Professional liar.
Christine Toes, VP/Associate Broker, Corcoran, Can't close a deal.
Posted by Real Estate Guru
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 03:46 PM
I appreciate you including these comments in one place. It really allows me to get a good feel for the current market without doing a lot of searching. Thanks for the great resource!
Posted by anon1
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 04:05 PM
Ahh... Christine "The Sky is not Falling, People" Toes. Her piece defending the manhattan market from September of last year is a must-read for the humor value: http://www.urbandigs.com/2008/09/manhattan_real_estate_the_sky.html
I love her quote: "Buyers and sellers are still 10% apart on price." Really? Wouldn't transactions be getting done if that was the case???
Posted by Azret Deljanin
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 05:10 PM
Noah, I would first like to say I have been an avid reader of this blog and enjoy most of your entries.
As for this entry...
The recession/depression or whatever you want to call it is far from over. If anyone recalls in the 90's the Manhattan market steadily decreased in the late 80's to about '94-'95 when the market finally leveled, and the situation was a little worse with mortgage rates in the 10-18% range. Increases in prices and sales did not occur until 1998 or so, and really took off in 2001. It would seem to me that this may be another boom/bust cycle that occurs every 10 to 15 years or so. If that were the case I would expect the decrease in prices to somewhat plateau in 2011-2012 and finally begin to increase again in 2015. The extreme rapid development in Manhattan inflated the market to unpredictable levels and there is no true benchmark to where the prices should be. Until some measure is created (solely to be driven to supply and demand); brokers, buyers, and sellers will have to sit on the edge of their seats hoping to make a deal or another. As I tell all of my customers, only move/buy if you have to, deals and profits will not reach 2006-2007 levels for quite some time.
Posted by Out there looking
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 05:44 PM
Native UWSider:
I agree with you on the Great Depression values but we are not faced with regular folks being literally unable to get money from their ATM's. Looking back to the post-70's bust with its 21% Prime Rate, you will still find that Manhattan apartments traded only as low as 20% above rental equilibrium.
The implication of this is that even in dire times, buyers here believe there is 3% long term capital value inflation. Geared at 4:1 leverage (20% down) their return on equity is 12% subject only to deferrable capital gains taxes and that beats the historical S+P which returned only a similarly leveraged 9% with worse after-tax consequences.
My figures come from an HSBC long term economic study which was generated in 2006. I wish I still had it handy and I would post it.
Posted by Noah
Fri Apr 17th, 2009 05:57 PM
Azret - thanks and I agree with your comment. To explain what I meant when I said: "By the end of the 4th quarter of 2009 and more likely the 1st quarter of 2010, I think the bulk of the adjustment will be complete - unless the world changes again by some unforeseen event."
is simply - Lets say Manhattan real estate proves to fall 50% from peak to trough in this latest downrun (hypothetical here, for sake of argument). My point is that by this time in 2010, the BULK of that adjustment will be complete. So lets say 80% of that move is done by that time. After that I see a muddled L market for years with sluggish sales volume. People will HATE to even talk about Manhattan real estate. They will hate the asset. So I expect continued declines but not at the level that is currently going on. Right now, this market is adjusting at a very fast pace and I expect a few more waves down to continue by this time next year.
Thanks for your comment!!
Posted by cfranch
Sat Apr 18th, 2009 09:47 AM
All RE price predictions are nonsense. Same goes for the stock market. I prefer to look at market sentiment and actual price points and volume. Market bottoms are marked by extreme pessimism by everyone involved. Currently brokers(see above) are way to optimistic and sellers, while not optimistic, are not realistic. Market bottoms are also marked by panic selling at high volume followed by low volume sales with little price change. We have not had the panic volume selling yet. Listings have been creeping up but I am looking for a big dump into the market. Also looking for the brokers to throw in the towel and just look to get any deals done at any price. The next time Noah interviews the above 4 maybe the won't be in order: snide, robotic, confused. Seems one has to be anonymous to tell the truth
Posted by Out there looking
Sat Apr 18th, 2009 07:57 PM
"snide, robotic, confused. "
Try embarrassed, ashamed and doing their best to cover it all up. Remember, this trio told many, many buyers over the last 2 years that they had to buy now or miss out and that they were getting great deals that they could one day sell at a profit.
No what to do when the same client comes back to unload the precious Important Trophy Apartment? Admit that you are a know-nothing who is just in it for commissions? Or dissemble, deny and hope some even dopier buyer cleans up the mess for you?
Posted by jd
Sun Apr 19th, 2009 10:51 PM
Nice post and discussion. Smart move to lead off with Todd Stevens whose comment comes across as the stupidest thing I may have ever read on the topic.
Enough Said on that.I am simply not seeing the sales volume out there, and it is interesting that in the 1 to 1.5 million range there is not much interesting on the market and not much selling. The higher end market is in clear free fall. When does the pressure get felt at the lower end where there are many eager buyers?
On the other hand look up 1998 prices -- factor of 3 lower across the board compared to current asks. The economy is not far from 1998.
very interesting months coming up.
Posted by Thisson
Mon Apr 20th, 2009 03:14 PM
At least the lower end of the market seems to be getting some support from renters who are looking into purchasing their first apartments.
This is partially ofset by concerns about job security, higher future taxes, the potential loss of mortgage interest as a deductible, and the potential for increased maintenance costs.
Posted by Todd Stevens
Wed Apr 22nd, 2009 11:22 PM
Good Evening. This is Todd Stevens. Yes, too much time is misused by misleading buyers into viewing homes they are unable to afford. Let's figure that we're all worth $100 per hour whether we earn this, less than this or more than this. So, including train time, $150 of the buyer's time is wasted, $150 of the buyers realtor's time is wasted, maybe $150 of the seller's time is wasted (if they're walking around because the buyers wants to view on the weekend) and $150 of the sellers realtor's time is wasted. That's a whopping $600 of time to show a home that a buyer cannot afford and will not buy. And $168 of which would have been taxes paid to the government. Everyone's best interest is at heart if all four parties partook in another activity for these 1 1/2 hours.
Posted by Out there looking
Thu Apr 23rd, 2009 09:15 PM
Wow, Todd. You may actually be the biggest twit in brokerage today. Most of your time is wasted by yourself - in that you choose to list many, many apartments which are more than 30% overpriced. Prospective buyers who come to look at your overpriced apartments are, in today's market, expecting to make low-ball offers and ignore asking prices when they are so far off the mark.
Perhaps if you don't want your time wasted by prospective buyers who may create a commission for you, you should either refuse over-priced listings or simply write PRICE NOT NEGOTIABLE when you post them.
In that case all of the simpletons who just assume your Sellers and you are actually hoping to get an offer will just stop coming by to check out what you are trying to sell. You won't have to spend even a minute showing any of your listings and we can happily assume that they will sit and sit until 2017 when 2006 prices come back.
Have a great, not busy day!
Posted by Todd Stevens
Sun May 24th, 2009 12:03 AM
If I have four contracts out on four of my listings, how could my homes be 30% overpriced? Golly gee, I hope someone says "yes, you're right, the market has arrived to bottom and is now rising".
Posted by Todd Stevens
Sun May 24th, 2009 12:03 AM
If I have four contracts out on four of my listings, how could my homes be 30% overpriced? Golly gee, I hope someone says "yes, you're right, the market has arrived to bottom and is now rising".
Posted by web design India
Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 08:02 AM
thanks u r information
Posted by Web Design Company India
Wed Sep 30th, 2009 04:06 PM
Thanks for sharing, its great info
Web Design Company India,Logo Design Company India,
Web Designers India
Posted by strainer3
Wed Nov 18th, 2009 11:35 AM
I believe we're real close to a multi-year top in many stock markets around the world in part because of all of the mistepts by governments to try to control the business cycle and disrupt the free market. But there are still some individual names I like going forward because of what the govt is doing to try to help the economy. One of which is Golden Star Resources, ticker GSS, a junior gold mining company which reported earnings recently and whose stock has performed rather well this year. Here is a discussion on their earnings and some thoughts on Golden Star Resources . I wouldn't necessarily step in and buy the stock today, but I would definitely would on a 5-10% pullback. I think the macro environment is going to remain very favorable for gold for the next several years because of the deflationary threats of the credit crisis and the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve in trying to combat these issues.
Posted by Brisbane real estate
Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:39 AM
I am new comer to this site.
Posted by hamptons real estate
Thu Apr 1st, 2010 11:53 AM
Interesting article about the real estate market.
Posted by britney
Thu Apr 15th, 2010 06:39 AM
This conversation is going no where. It’s lacking the place of a good leader to head the things to come out on conclusion.
mls listings
Posted by Realestate Broker
Fri Aug 13th, 2010 05:19 AM
Great analysis! I agree with this post up to great extent. Points analyzed in this post really appreciable. This is really a good time for real estate market after a long recession. People who like to buy a property for commercial or residential purpose in India, can visit this site or or can call at 800-232-2343 or 0120-4338222 for any query or detail about the price, payment plans or location etc.
Posted by Stock Market
Tue Jul 26th, 2011 12:18 AM
very good post, i was really searching for this topic as i wanted this topic to understand completely and it is also very rare in internet that is why it was very difficult to understand
thank you for sharing this.
Regard
Stock Market
Posted by Share market
Tue Sep 27th, 2011 02:38 AM
It was a awe-inspiring post and it has a significant meaning and thanks for sharing the information. Would love to read your next post too...
Thanks
Regards:
Share Market