Pick Your Poison: Fair Market Value, Orderly Liquidation Value or Forced Liquidation Value

I'm a certified machinery & equipment appraiser (CMEA), one of my lesser-known talents. In machinery and equipment appraisal there is a concept called market exposure; my business partner who is a trained commercial real estate appraiser reminds me that the same concept also applies to real estate appraisal. Market exposure, loosely speaking, is the amount of time a property, company or piece of equipment would be expected to be on the market in order to produce a full price sale. A "full price sale" is generally defined as Fair Market Value (FMV). An appraiser has several ways of estimating Fair Market Value. In residential real estate they generally stick to the Sale Comparison Approach, or comps, for short. A sale of property with a normal period of market exposure should produce a price near appraised "Fair Market Value" based on comps. Just set aside for the moment that in a significantly declining market comps get stale quickly (as Noah has written about, appraisers have a strategy for addressing this called time value adjustment). When an entire company or a piece of machinery and equipment has to be sold more quickly than through "normal market exposure", an appraiser will look at two other potential values: Orderly Liquidation Value (OLV) or Forced Liquidation Value (FLV). These would be the values expected to be produced if the company or machinery and equipment had to be disposed of much more quickly, say, over 90 days in the case of OLV, or at auction (essentially immediate liquidation) in the case of FLV. These market exposure situations generally result because of a need to repay debts.
So what does this have to do with New York City real estate? As I said earlier, in the case of a Fair Market Value sale, value is generally expected to be 100 cents on the dollar vs. comps (in the case of real estate it would be time-adjusted comps). In the case of orderly liquidations of machinery and equipment, the rule of thumb is that the assets generally bring about 50 cents on the dollar of OLV vs. FMV. Forced Liquidation is assumed to result in recovery of about 25 cents on the dollar of Fair Market Value. I know from my Wall Street days that the orderly liquidation of a company is usually thought to bring 50 - 70% of book value, depending on how much of that value are things like receivables that can be sold at small haircuts and how much is land or machinery and equipment that must be liquidated at bigger discounts.
Real estate appraisal only has one definition for "distressed"-type sales.
According to the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal 4th Edition "Liquidation Value" is:
The most probable price that a specified interest in real property is likely to bring
under all of the following conditions:
1. Consummation of a sale will occur within a severely limited future marketing period
specified by the client.
2. The actual market conditions currently prevailing are those to which the appraised
property interest is subject.
3. The buyer is acting prudently and knowledgeably.
4. The seller is under extreme compulsion to sell.
5. The buyer is typically motivated.
6. The buyer is acting in what he or she considers his or her best interest.
7. A limited marketing effort and time will be allowed for the completion of a sale.
8. Payment will be made in cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements
comparable thereto.
9. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by
special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the
sale.
From what I understand, there is no rule of thumb for the markdown required to move property with less than "normal" market exposure, but I am already seeing busted condo developments where investors are valuing the property at the 50 cents on the dollar OLV level. They get there not by valuing them as condos, but by falling back on the value of the units as rental apartments, because no one even wants to think about having to sell new condos in this environment.
We have not yet seen Forced Liquidation Value type blowout sales and maybe we won't in commercial real estate. But I would not be surprised to see some OLV type residential real estate sales as we are seeing in commercial. For those who have been asserting that NYC residential real estate values could fall 50%...there is actually a pretty decent theoretical basis for their argument (although my official prediction is 40%), since we are all coming to understand that weak-handed sellers and vulture buyers set pricing in markets where normal buyers fear to tread. Orderly Liquidation Value is the watchword for now. I would be curious to know what Forced Liquidation Values look like vs. peak prices in places like Florida and Nevada where they actually are having auctions; 75% off seems too steep a hit even for these horrendous markets.



Posted by AvUWS
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 10:53 AM
75% does seem like too steep a hit. But only if phrased that way. Or one can look at the new "corrected" FMV of some 25% down from the top (for the sake of argument) and then still getting distressed sales off of those new lower levels. 1/3 off of the new lower basis (1/3 of the 75% is 25%) means 50% off of peak. If 25% is conservative then declines of greater than 50% are indeed very possible.
Posted by anonymous
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 11:21 AM
Brilliant analysis, Jeff.
For residential real estate in Manhattan, for the people who bought at the height of the bubble, it would be a miracle for them to see even 50 cents on the dollar.
A one bedroom condo some numbnut bought for say $1.3, won't even be worth $750,000. What people have forgotten is that $750,000 is almost a million bucks, these are still insane prices.
Posted by Bee Dub
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 11:31 AM
Would you say that the price from a foreclosure auction would be the FLV?
Posted by Noah
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 11:37 AM
Jeff - when might we see OLV evolve to a forced liquidation structure? 2 quarters? 3 quarters?
Great piece, thanks!
Posted by jeff
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 12:05 PM
Noah,
I think we will see some liquidation type sales in the boroughs where properties will be sold on the courthouse steps due to foreclosures. In Manhattan where there are so many coops and people presumably have reserves to live on and pay their mortgages while they look around for a buyer we will see orderly liquidations. But orderly liquidations are still not Fair Market Value sales for 2 reasons, the person is ultimately being forced to sell and therefore cannot necessarily afford to have "normal" market exposure time. An added downside is that in a down market like this with lower turnover "normal" market exposure time obviously rises.
Posted by jr
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 12:30 PM
Jeff - where then do you (sorry if you have posted this before) see Manhattan prices going over the next few years and do you seem them coming back to the high levels again - if so, what time frame. i understand there is no crystal ball, just curious.
Posted by brenda
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 12:36 PM
Did you see that the developers of 20 Pine are offering a bulk sale of 80 apartments for around $650 psf, they claim about 50% of market value?
Posted by anonymous
Fri Jan 9th, 2009 12:40 PM
Hi jr, I'm anonymous broker-
Prices in Manhattan are going over the cliff. The are zero fundamentals to support any normal pricing.
We are going to see a lost decade, just like Japan.
It will be a steep fall, then what is called an L recovery which means prices will remain very low for a long, long time.
Take your time, and you'll pick up some great prime Manhattan real estate for pennies on the dollar.
Of course, people who don't need to sell for arounf ten years or so, will be okay. But you won't see any appreciation until around 2016 more or less. And then it will be modest, not like we've just been through.
Posted by BrooklynGal
Sat Jan 10th, 2009 04:15 PM
I'm in contract for a condo in one of the bigger new developments in Brooklyn Heights and am seriously thinking about walking away.
The developer is sticking to his summer 07 prices despite current and future outlooks. While i can understand his desire to keep the value of the units he has already sold, i am questioning his ability to keep the building viable (he has only sold 15% of the building) with his current strategy. The brokers showing the units are providing little if any confidence that the developer is going to keep this building afloat. Guess everyone is entitled to their delusions.
Posted by Donald
Sun Jan 11th, 2009 05:32 PM
How is the developer delusional BrooklynGal? He got you to pay his prices, so he is obvivously the smart one.
Posted by bds
Sun Jan 25th, 2009 09:05 AM
We have a deposit on a contract at The Rushmore Riverside...very concerned about the depression of the value and still being forced to pay market price of 20 months ago? Please comment as to how to proceed
Posted by Coral Gables Houses
Sat Apr 24th, 2010 05:47 AM
Great real estate blog. I do appreciate this. Thanks