RE Transaction Revenue Down 61% - Hits MTA Funds
A: The decline in real estate transaction produced tax revenue has hit the MTA's kitty and is playing a role in today's decision to hike rates. Between the loss of collected tax revenue from Wall Street & real estate transactions, the city will be forced to either cutback on services or hike other rates to fill the void; or combination of both. Today's news confirms the illiquid nature of this market, and likely shows the buyer strike starting at or around the September time frame. Markets and investor psychology is funny like that, sometimes the writing is on the wall but until that spark comes, you won't see any drastic change. It seems rational to now declare that the fall of Lehman Brothers & rescue of AIG were the sparks that really started the buyer strike here in Manhattan.
If collected real estate transaction taxes are down 61%, or down $63,000,000.00 from $103M to $37M compared to the same period from last year (collected mid month), that pretty much reflects the contracts signed activity from SEP & OCT (given 2-3 months closing time from contracts signed), and any delayed closings from new development purchases. This is why I can say that the 'buyer strike', or 'illiquid market', or whatever you want to call it likely was sparked at this time; coincidentally the time when Lehman declared bankruptcy and AIG was rescued by the government. To me, these credit crisis events was the spark that lit the illiquid fire.
The NY Times reports, "M.T.A. Approves Cuts but Seeks Help":
The authority said this week that an important source of revenue — taxes on real estate transactions — was running well below recent forecasts, which had already been revised downward several times to account for the economic downturn.This just shows how the slowdown trickles into the main economy and ultimately leads to decisions that are very tough to make, yet necessary. Between wall street revenue taxes and real estate transaction taxes collected, we are in for at least a year of collections being sharply down from past years. Lets hope the powers that be can manage this budget problem effectively and minimize the damage.
Those real estate and mortgage taxes brought in $37 million this month (the proceeds are received by mid-month), compared with $103 million in the same period last year, Gary J. Dellaverson, the authority’s chief financial officer, said at a meeting of the board’s finance committee on Monday.
“This is a really sobering number,” Mr. Dellaverson said. “This does show how frightening this economy can be in terms of our sensitive taxes.”
He said the authority had tried to be very conservative in predicting real estate transaction tax receipts as the economy worsened, basing its forecasts on projections made by the city.
He said that projections of December’s tax receipts had repeatedly been reduced as the year progressed, falling to $88 million from $99 million before finally being revised down again only a month ago, to $64 million. But the reality was even worse, missing the mark by $27 million.
Gov. Patterson's proposed 'doomsday budget' includes higher taxes on a host of products/services as well as 'deep cuts' in spending. According to Newsday.com's "Bloomberg says Paterson's NYC budget cuts unfair":
Mayor Michael Bloomberg said yesterday he understood Gov. David A. Paterson's task of closing a $15.4-billion deficit, but called it unfair for Albany to cut the city proportionally "more ... than anyplace else."This is the dark period after any severe economic crisis. There is no reason to avoid acknowledging it, and nothing wrong with discussing it. We have to go through this to come out the other end, so lets be prepared for changes we may face, adapt accordingly, and hopefully these guys know what they are doing!
The cut in state aid would amount to harsher budget cuts for the city already suffering a worsening fiscal crisis.
In response to a projected $4 billion deficit through 2010, Bloomberg in November proposed tax hikes, cancellation of the incoming police cadet class of 1,000 officers and shrinking the city's workforce by 3,000 people. Last week, Bloomberg last week asked city agencies to find $1.4 billion in cuts for 2010.



Posted by Fred
Thu Dec 18th, 2008 12:36 PM
Reminds me of the cliff divers in Acapulco. Why, that might just be a good place to spend the next three years while the dust settles up here.....Once buyers are convinced that a better deal is around the corner, they really dig their heals in. It's essentially the same mentality that pushed the DJ over 14,000 and oil to $147.
Posted by Donald
Thu Dec 18th, 2008 12:57 PM
If you don't like the service cuts and fare hikes, you can always go to an MTA meeting and throw some shoes:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/12172008/news/regionalnews/man_tries_to_throw_shoe_during_mta_meeti_144642.htm Seriously, what has this world come to? If anyone throws shoes at me, I'm keeping them! Enjoy walking home bare-foot. LOL
Posted by faustus
Thu Dec 18th, 2008 01:33 PM
Noah, Am I missing something, or is the big (read: colossal) story of the day Fannie's revision of the new development pre-sale thresholds from 51% to 70%? That's going to have severe aftershocks in our market no?
Posted by Donald
Thu Dec 18th, 2008 01:51 PM
Yes, that 70% reuirement is not good news since very few developments are 70% sold. And if te buyer does not have a mortgage contingency in their contract, they lose their 10% deposit. I think we now have the final nail in the coffin for the RE market. Although the good news is that this might increase sales at existing buildings. Although I could be wrong...
Posted by office-noah
Thu Dec 18th, 2008 02:53 PM
I have made some inquiries. I want to dig a bit on that annoucement before making any comments on effects here.
I would think that most new devs, the bulk during the boom that is, already is close to sold or at or near the 70% threshold. Yes, some pricier ones arent and later devs aren't, but I wouldnt think this is as drastic as first thought.
I know it has happened already if they arent 50% sold, and the building would make a deal with a bank to solve the problem. But let me dig a bit.
Posted by brenda
Thu Dec 18th, 2008 07:43 PM
Hi Noah,
I'm curious what would happen with people walking away from their contracts? Seems like you could have the odd situation of having a few closings happen and then if a certain number didn't close the remaining couldn't until replacements were found for those contract cancellations. Or is it once over 70% always considered over 70%? Seems like amended offering plans would negate that.
Just curious, this doesn't seem to affect Manhattan greatly (at least not until prices in new developments fall quite a bit more), but may affect the outlying areas more.