Mortgages: The Raw Data

Posted by MortgageMan on August 12, 2008 at 8.56 AM

In these times of great confusion and virtually no forecast of the mortgage market, I thought it would be a great time to take a step back and look at what is happening, present day.

The mortgage market has experienced substantial change over the course of the past year and a half or so; Guidelines are stricter, underwriting is tighter, credit is scarce, and worst of all it’s not over yet. Some of these items may not be of great surprise to you as they usually make financial headlines at least once a week, but I wanted to touch on a couple of items that, in my eyes, need to be addressed:

1. Home Equity Products are virtually non-existent and even if they are available, they don’t offer too much benefit. There are many reasons for this, one of them being that home prices are falling all across the nation, making these products very risky investments on the secondary market from a collateral perspective. Even if a bank does offer a Home Equity product, it will limit them to very low CLTV limits and very high credit ratings. The days of 80/20 and 80/10/10 financing are LONG gone.

2. PMI is the solution. Since HELOCS and HELOANS are no longer available as a way to offer subordinate financing, full 90% or 95% financing is achieved using one big mortgage with Private Mortgage Insurance. In this instance a bank receives insurance from a third party to insure the note (since it is above 80% LTV/CLTV) and the premium for this is passed on to you – the borrower.

3. The GSE’s (Government Sponsored Entities) are struggling. This is never good for any person working with/looking for mortgages, the GSE’s raised the premiums they charge to secure loans, they are not willing to securitize as many mortgages as they did before, and they do not want to keep a lot of risky/toxic assets on their balance sheets. Who would?!?!

4. FHA – The temporary band aid. You will hear these 3 letters used more and more often than usual over the next few years. FHA or Federal Housing Administration is a government entity that uses more lenient guidelines to offer more people mortgages. There are many variables to this program but in a nutshell, they generally do not have a credit score requirement, you need to have stable income and must be able to prove it, and you need to produce various types of documentation to prove to the government that you are capable of repaying the loan. This all comes at a price and is not cheap. Doesn’t it remind you of that little mishap we all want to forget? Subprime?.

5. JUMBO Mortgages – Most banks are not able to get them off their books and therefore are not able to write new loans at decent interest rates. It seems like the mentality is that since there is no secondary market for JUMBO mortgages, the banks will have to take more of a spread to keep the loans in their portfolio. As a result I am currently offering 7.375% on a Jumbo 5/1 ARM @ 0 points.

This is just a small piece of the puzzle and is how I see the mortgage market present day. Almost every Fortune 500 company which at some point in time offered or continues to offer conventional mortgages, is reporting huge losses and we are certainly not out of the water yet. The outlook is to remain positive and hope for the best, the damage has already been done. And as Noah has said many times before, there is no such thing as free lunch.

Before I forget, I am MortgageMan. I am a loan officer at a major financial institution in the NYC area and have chosen to use an alias to remain anonymous. My goal will always be to give you a clear view of the current market status from a lender’s perspective. I will try to post consistently, and prioritize discussions when the market that I work in sees a drastic change; either for better or for worse.

Comments (29)

You are giving 7.375% on a Jumbo 5/1 ARM @ 0 points? The current rate is below 6% for that jumbo in Manhattan according to Manhattan Mortgage Co. Even the 30 year fixed is less than 7%.

Posted by John | August 12, 2008 10:32 AM

Welcome MortgageMan! Noah told me you'd be posting soon.

I'm curious - why isn't there a secondary market for jumbo mortgages? Do they default more often than conventional mortgages? If not, it seems like this is an untapped market. I don't have any real data, but my very naive hunch is that larger loans are made to richer people, who are less likely to default, so the loans themselves are safer?

The temporarily increased conforming limit - thoughts on that? Do you think the raised limit might become permanent?

Posted by Steve | August 12, 2008 11:05 AM

If people are unable to secure loans, it appears that Manhattan apartment prices must fall a lot further. Any opinions?

Posted by On the fence | August 12, 2008 11:06 AM

Interesting on the jumbo 5/1 currently being at 7%+.

Is this a recent phenomonen? I closed on a $1mm+ loan on a 5/1 IO ARM at 5.75% with 0 points in the middle of May. Was I just particularly lucky or did rates move so far in the past 3 months?

In my mind, this is a very important statistic for buyers and something which clearly impacts the buy/rent equation significantly. (The service cost on the mortgage has increased 28% all other things being equal). On a sample size of one, I would be choosing to rent if I was being offered 7.375% and not 5.75%.


Posted by Anonymous Banker | August 12, 2008 11:27 AM

Great post! very refreshing to see 'the facts' posted by a loan professional without bias

Keep up the great work!

Posted by uwsider | August 12, 2008 11:29 AM

anon - yes rates did move up in past 3 months, rather significantly. Mortgage markets were pretty bad in July. I think they eased a bit though in past week or two

Posted by Noah | August 12, 2008 11:30 AM

mortgage man,

Explain the phenomena that is me having locked a 6.0% 611 amount, 90 ltv loan on non-warrantable new construction condo, paying a point.

When I was shopping around I wasn't able to find anything in this neighborhood. Is this too good to be true. Can they screw me once they send me to underwriting? Meaning can they say "wups, sorry, underwriting can now only offer you 7%+ now."

Thanks.

Posted by k91 | August 12, 2008 11:35 AM

Steve:

Thanks for the warm welcome.

To answer your question we really need to take a historical approach.

Before President Bush signed the stimulus plan in to effect allowing for an increased limit to conforming mortgages, anything over a $417,000 loan amount was considered jumbo territory.

That said, unlike conforming mortgages (which are sold off to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac), jumbo loans are underwritten using each financial institution's own underwriting guidelines. With loans defaulting all over the place, investors just do not want to invest in a batch of loans that were not securitized by the government; mainly because they do not trust that bank's underwriting system. By taking these actions, investors are not maintaining a secondary market for Jumbo loans, forcing most banks to hold these loans on their balance sheets. This is not good because it creates a higher rate for new borrowers, because the banks must charge higher interest rates to make money off the loans.

As far as the increased loan limits, I think it’s a great concept. Now with the restrictions lifted allowing financing on CO-OP's and 2 Family Homes, I think it creates a lot of potential for more financing and more options to home buyers across the nation, thus spurring a buyer’s economy. I hope that they do make it a permanent increase, however, realistically I just don't know if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac can keep their appetite for the massive influx of mortgages. And even if they do, they will have no choice but to charge higher premiums to the borrowers.

Posted by MortgageMan | August 12, 2008 11:40 AM

k91:

Before I answer your question, can you please let me know when you locked in?

Thanks.

Posted by MortgageMan | August 12, 2008 11:44 AM

uwsider:

Thank you! I look forward to providing more unbiased info for you to read and will update as soon as I can.

Posted by MortgageMan | August 12, 2008 11:47 AM

Mortgage man,

I locked in middle July, the week after the gse 's exploded. Very best 30 Years went from 6 and eighthish to 6 and half plus. 5/1's went from 5.85ish to 6.3plus for what are called conformig jumbos right? Basically most guys I was shopping had rate sheets no where near 6 or below so I locked with this guy (I was already in contract).

Anyway, I am just wondering the program he was pricing. Apparateny thewarrantable issue is a non factor in this current program as well as my high LTV (relatively speaking). Wife and I are 750+ fico though. My thoughts are that I ran into a smaller banks flush with capital, for whatever reason, and that i was able to best the bigger guys?

Even though I am locked, I am worried about a loophole that would allow them to not honor the lock, and to bump me up to more a more market rate. Insight thoughts appreciated.

And with regard to having a professional speak transparently about an otherwise opaque industry/market, I think is a great idea. Hopefully mortageg man bcomes a regular. As far as housig markets, especially new yorks, mortgage rates and insight thereto is KEY!

Posted by k91 | August 12, 2008 12:05 PM

Mortgage Man - Welcome and thanks for your answer to Steve's first great question. Not sure if it answers his specific point which I will expand to mean: Why isn't some entity out there only securitizing and making a market in Manhattan jumbo mortgages since, like Steve says, they would presumably be "safer" debtors?

Posted by bryan | August 12, 2008 1:03 PM

you guys see this?

FREDDIE TO STOP BUYING NYS SUBPRIME MORTGAGES

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121854958232433367.html

Not that we have such subprime exposure, but damn, thats a pretty specific kick in the a$$

Posted by Noah | August 12, 2008 1:41 PM

Bryan, Steve:

Great question. So sorry for the misunderstanding.

Here is my opinion: It is true that Jumbo loans do require more affluent buyers. Better credit scores, lower Loan to Value ratios, lower Debt to Income ratios, etc., thus making the application much more "safer" or risk adverse.

However, we must also look at this scenario from a default perspective.

Since jumbo loans carry higher loan amounts, I think that from an investors' risk perspective, the loan doesn't look so favorable. For example if someone was to own a condo on the UES worth $3MM and carry a 80% financing mortgage of $2.4MM, it would be extremely hard for the financial institution to sell the asset and make their money back should the borrower default. Anything in this world could happen and this credit risk has to be built in.

The above is just a sample of the risk involved with Jumbo loans. There is also the risk that a majority of jumbo loans, especially right now, are ARM's and if the payment should jump once the fixed rate expires, will the borrower be able to repay the loan?

Also, as I mentioned before, there is no appetite for jumbo loans right now and not many companies want them on their balance sheets. So I do not think that at this point in time a company would want to keep a whole bunch of risky assets in their portfolio.

Thoughts?

Posted by MortgageMan | August 12, 2008 1:51 PM

In a phrase Mortgagman - banks are HOARDING CASH! Capital raising is NOT over, more write downs coming in alt-a and prime write downs, and dividend cuts highly likely.

Banks need to hoard cash and being lenient for jumbo's right now is not really the answer to their problems.

My two cents

Posted by Noah | August 12, 2008 1:53 PM

GUTS PLEASE DO NOT FORGET TO TYPE IN THE "nyc" SECURITY CODE FOR THESE COMMENTS.

I USUALLY DONT CHECK JUNK FOLDER, BUT DID JUST NOT AND FOUND 4 COMMENTS ALREADY THAT RESULTED FROM LACK OF TYPING IN SECURITY CODE. MAKE SURE ITS FILLED IN IF YOU WANT COMMENT TO APPEAR. ITS AUTOMATED, AND I DO NOT APPROVE COMMENTS ANYMORE.

THANKS

Posted by Noah | August 12, 2008 4:30 PM

John:

As of today I was closer to 6.875% on a 5/1 ARM Jumbo @ 0 points.

Manhattan Mortgage is a broker and usually facilitates their loans through another lender. If they are in fact quoting below 6.00% on that product, that is wonderful yet very rare in the Manhattan area. In fact, many major banks are no longer allowing financing of Jumbo ARM's through the broker channel. They are most likely getting that rate through a small lender, I.E. Astoria Federal, Hudson City, etc.

If I was you I would be very cautious when it comes to closing, I have seen many cases where small banks cannot fund the loan at closing or pull their commitments last second.

I am a loan officer, not broker, so I can only quote rates for the bank that I work for.

Posted by MortgageMan | August 12, 2008 6:25 PM

On The Fence:

Even though banks are offering higher rates for Jumbo products and making it seem as if they do not want them on their balance sheets, they are still offering and securing them - just for a higher price.

The Manhattan market is known to be an anomally to the current real estate conditions and I do not think that apartment prices will fall drastically just because rates are high.

Posted by MortgageMan | August 12, 2008 6:32 PM

Are 90% jumbo LTV loans still available? closing on $1.625mm condo soon and worried that 90% (80/10/10) won't be an option at that level.

If I'm not sensitive to interest rates, what is the max LTV available today?

Posted by JumboBorrower | August 12, 2008 7:43 PM

JumboBorrower:

90% loans are still available, however I have not heard of any financial institution offer a 80/10/10 in a long time. Especially for jumbo loans.

Most banks will still be able to do a 90% financing loan in Manhattan, but it will be one big loan with PMI.

Also, please use the code "nyc" when posting next time as the comment you posted went into the "junk" folder.

Hope this helps. Thanks!

Posted by MortgageMan | August 12, 2008 9:59 PM

MM
This is great that you're here offering unbiased talk .

To get a conforming fixed mtg loan these days where should one go. Any recommendations?

DW

Posted by DW | August 13, 2008 11:03 AM

DW:

Thank you! I look forward to providing more info as I go along for all you guys to enjoy.

As far as the recommendation for a lender, I will tell you this: There are approximatley 7 major banks on every 5 blocks, in the entire Manhattan area, all competing for YOUR business. I am sure all of them will be in the same vicinity as far as rate goes. The question is, who do you trust?

Here is my opinion: just stay away from the little banks. They are very volatile and may pull their commitments at any time during the origination process.

Posted by MortgageMan | August 13, 2008 12:23 PM

My experience (I've taken 4 mortgages in the last 15 years) has been that the smaller lenders that are available through the mortgage brokers are far more flexible (both during the application process as well as at closing time) than the 800 lb gorillas. It's no wonder that the big banks are getting out of the lending business; they obviously can't compete on either price or service with the mortgage brokers. I've got perfect credit and the process that I've gone through with Citibank in the past few months has been worse than root canal.

Posted by JustABuyer | August 13, 2008 1:22 PM

Welcome MortgageMan!

Great post and very informative, look forward to hearing more from you.

Posted by pcmodem | August 13, 2008 2:07 PM

we have a 5/1 jumbo arm locked in through a mortgage broker, the loan comes from astoria bank.
we are putting 40% down and have been cleared by bank and have a closing set up already. can astoria bank pull out at this point?

Posted by gorod | August 13, 2008 7:23 PM

with 40% down? I doubt they will unless you are still stretching to make payments and they are really undercapitalized

Posted by Noah | August 13, 2008 8:02 PM

Gorod:

I agree with Noah.

Having a 60% Loan to Value ratio and assuming that you have excellent income, asset requirements, and credit score, I do not see why Astoria would pull back their commitment.

Unless they are very illiquid and simply cannot fund the loan.

Best of luck at the closing and congrats on your new purchase!

Posted by MortgageMan | August 13, 2008 9:31 PM

MM & Noah,

Informative, however, how can you promote this flaccid understanding of our current market conditions. Why don't, we, offer a clear reality.

Lets start with the Brokers. They are being shut down because the major banks are shuttering their correspondent/wholesale lending windows. This in turn drives them to the regionals banks, like the aforementioned. These regional stand on the pillars of their balance sheets, savings accounts, cds, and perhaps, brokered deposits like that of the Indymac and 10+ bank failures this year. The Fed has a black list of 90 banks that are near default and almost no one knows this.

A little history lesson for you all. The FDIC lost 10% of their capitalization when they replaced the lost capital in the checking and savings when the bailed out Indymac.

Ok so, where does this leave us. Brokers can only exist as far as they have a place to broker to. Regulation will soon be in place and this will force them to comply and license themselves. Frankly, most banks don't like brokers because they have no oversight i.e. are the most prone to fraud which results in default. They will struggle on but barely.

Banks. They cannot pull a commitment letter. A letter of commitment is legally binding. The only way they can pull a commitment letter is if they close down their lending department or close down entirely. In which case if a bank buys them, they then assume the liabilities and contracts of the previous bank.

Jumbo Loans: $729,750- $5,000,000. Hudson City, Astoria Federal, and First Republic all have the best rates in the Jumbo Arm market right now. Hands down. End of story. But they are at risk of default themselves. So act while you can if you need to.

Conforming loans: $1 - $729,750. 30 year fixed rates 80% LTV. All banks fall in at about 6.25%-6.75%. On any given day. Just keep an eye on the 10 Year T bill.

The 10 Year T bill or Treasury bill: Is a bond traded in the market. It is the bellwether for interest rate pricing for mortgage. It is good tool for any consumer. The real market that dictates pricing is the MBS market or Mortgage Backed Security market. Consumers don't have access to this but it is almost in lock step with the 10 year. So, for your purposes this is good enough.

Pricing: The 10 YT has floated between 3.2% - 4.2% all year. Obviously when this is lower, closer to 3.2 rates will be lower i.e. in the low 5% range on a 30 year fixed mortgage. Today, we are just below 4% and the rates are in the mid 6% range. This goes for all banks in the US. Simple as that.

And Noah. Banks are not hoarding cash. They are losing too much of it. They are trying to plug the holes in their balance sheets. The result of this is a lack of capital to lend. With increase demand rates will go up.

Bottom line. For everyone trying to pick the bottom in the NYC housing market. Has been kept up by investors and foreign borrowers. Knock, knock,... whose there? The bank. The bank who? Banks are not lending any money to you.

Posted by TheJoker | August 14, 2008 1:43 AM

I think you mis-interpreted the context of how I said hoarding cash. I assume you read my site, so Ive been all over this credit crisis for over 13 months now. Banks balance sheets are toxic, write downs continue, spreading to higher quality assets, dividend are/have to be cut, lending is cut back, capital must be raised, and shares diluted if they sell more stock to raise money to meet capital requirements. That is what I meant. That is not an ideal environment for borrowers or banks which as you say, results in lack of capital to lend.

With increased demand, rates go up. You know what also makes rates go up? Risk aversion!

Posted by Noah | August 14, 2008 8:44 AM

Post a comment


To help maintain the integrity of the conversation we ask that each user simply paste the keyword (below in red) into the confirmation field below. Sorry, but if you forget this step, your comments will not be saved!