Why Manhattan Price DATA Will Stay Strong in 2008
A: The power of the data! Now that Bloomberg came out with a 'Manhattan Slowdown' article that rippled across the blogosphere, I want to explain to you why I would NOT expect future data reports to show a slowdown in prices! The reason is in the new development closing dynamic and the fantasy of perceived timing; deals signed 10 months ago that close two weeks ago are considered recent and reflective of current market conditions. If you want to monitor the health of the current NYC real estate marketplace, stick to watching sales volume and inventory trends as a reflection on buyer confidence.
NOTE: I wrote this two days ago after I read the Bloomberg piece, not after today's Q1 report; so I referenced the older Bloomberg article to make my point.
If a contract was signed in 2007 for a new development that closes 12 months later in 2008, the price data reported will reflect the market conditions for when the original contract was signed! However, human nature will perceive the future report as current and in line with the market at the time of the reports publish date! No this is not an episode of LOST with Desmond jumping back and forth through time! Its a simple acknowledgment that: PRICING DATA THAT IS YET TO COME WILL REFLECT PRICES PAID FOR NEW DEV CONDO'S MANY MONTHS EARLIER!
Because of this dynamic and the fact that Manhattan has plenty of new construction deals waiting to close at high prices per square foot, if we are to grasp the health of the CURRENT market we should look at inventory and sales volume trends! Otherwise we will likely be confused by stale misleading data.
Let me show you an example of what I mean. Did you notice that the Bloomberg article published Monday showed the following trends:
a) Year-over-Year Sales Volume SLOWED 6.4%
b) Inventory ROSE 15% Since Start of Year
...leading us to believe that the market was softening, sales volume slowing, and inventory rising. Yet, the article later stated...
c) Property Prices ROSE 14% to Median $850,000
d) Condo & Co-op Prices ROSE Throughout Year, UP 6.4% in Q4 from year earlier
...leading us to believe that prices are in the process of rising!
So what gives? How could prices rise as sales volume slows and inventory rises? The reason is because the prices component is NOT registered until after the deal closes; some 1-3 months generally from contract signing! For new development deals, a contract can be signed over a year in advance of the closing. Which leads me to tell everyone that 2008 will see the closings of thousands of new development units that were signed into contract in 2007!
QUESTION: How will the prices paid, especially the price per square foot paid, ultimately affect future quarterly price reports for Manhattan?
ANSWER: Positively! As new dev deals close, it will help to offset any weakness that may be occurring in the current existing resale marketplace causing a misleading and mysterious report that probably will not be in line with the sales volume & inventory trends at the time!
So, given the method of collecting closed sale prices, I would expect future Manhattan price data to remain strong as inventory & sales data (especially contracts signed data) more accurately represents the current marketplace at any given time!
Lets face it, sales of 15 CPW & The Plaza skewed last quarters pricing report and gave a very bullish yet misleading picture of our marketplace. According to Bloomberg's article, "Manhattan Home Prices Rise on Sales at Plaza Hotel":
Manhattan apartment prices rose 6.4 percent in the fourth quarter, boosted by sales at two new luxury developments, the Plaza Hotel and 15 Central Park West.Now we have hundreds of new developments that will be closing deals in 2008, that will do a similar thing!"A lot of the gain has to do with the unique circumstances of these two major buildings closing about the same time," said Gregory Heym, chief economist for Terra Holdings LLC, the closely held company that owns New York brokers Brown Harris Stevens and Halstead Property. "The high-end properties really pushed up the average price."
Apartments at the Plaza Hotel and 15 Central Park West, which accounted for 7 percent of total condo sales in the quarter, sold for an average $6.95 million, Heym said. The median price of a Manhattan apartment, including condominiums and co-ops, was $850,000, compared with $799,000 in the same period in 2006, according to Radar Logic Inc., a New York real estate data firm.
Jonathan Miller, of Miller Samuel & Matrix blog, chimes in on this topic:
"The record prices we saw in the current quarter don't reflect the "on the ground" activity of the market this quarter due to the high number of closing within new developments that actually went to contract last year. There was an unusual weighting of high end properties that skewed the mix of sales this quarter. The barometer of the market for 2008 will be largely measured on 3 factors: number of sales, listing inventory and days on market. Sales activity leads price direction."Today's NY Times story, touches on this exact phenomenon after reporting on Manhattan real estate's Q1 report:
Sales in the first quarter were strong in part because nearly a third of the apartments that closed were for condos that buyers signed contracts for at least a year ago, according to data tracked by Brown Harris Stevens and Halstead.So, when a broker or a friend says to you, "yea but look, Manhattan prices are up 15% since last year..." you can brush that off as just babble! We are at now now! If you want to know what is going on now, stick with sales volume and inventory trends!
PS: Now you know why I am trying to track contracts signed & new listings! Lets try to stay ahead of the curve so that we can expect the unexpected!!



Comments (23)
This hits the nail on the head. Noah - what impact, if any, do you think that these types of articles have on the market. One would think that buyers see through these articles by looking at comps and recent sales, while sellers may continue to cling to any sort of news/stats that support their prices. To me, this just perpetuates the stand-off, resulting in even higher inventory levels.
Posted by anon | April 2, 2008 2:38 PM
Im sure it may scare a few buyers off, and maybe even HELP to make a sell decision for some sellers who have been considering selling, but in the end, its still not enough inventory to warrant any crazy moves or a trend. If this continues and sales volume continues to drop and inventories continue to rise, then it might be the sign the lagging slowdown is here.
Manhattan slowdowns are generally short lived as it really is a market where buyers come alive if deals are to be had. Now we must see how sever the job losses and economic slowdown will be!
Posted by Noah | April 2, 2008 2:51 PM
Still no inventory. Try to buy a reasonably priced 3 bedroom, 1700-foot-plus family apartment near transportation and in a good school district. The only ones I have seen are 10-20 percent more than I paid in summer-fall 2007. I would expect layoffs and uncertainty to cause prices to drop, but they still have not, and I still don't see any quality apartments at clearly lower prices. I also know of plenty of people who believe they can time the market, who are waiting on the sidelines for the "right" time. Boy, oh boy, when they realize that the world is not ending, that is massive pent up demand. They still don't want to move to suburbia, they still want to have kids, and they still don't have a Manhattan apartment with enough bedrooms.
Prices are up because even with the uncertainty, there are more buyers than sellers.
Posted by Buyer | April 2, 2008 11:11 PM
That's funny, "Buyer", I mean "Broker Posing as a Buyer", I actually am a buyer and I have seen much more product since the beginning of the year. My sweet spot is 2+BRs, and not only has inventory been shooting up, but price cuts are in full force.
Another interesting stat:
Inventory now above 6,500, a WHOPPING 23% INCREASE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF FEBRUARY.
At several open houses this past weekend, brokers went out of their way to emphasize the negotiability of their prices. You should know this "Broker Posing as a Buyer"!
I've never felt more comfortable as a potential buyer, and it just gets better by the day.
Posted by anon | April 3, 2008 9:37 AM
I am seeing weakness in one bedrooms and small two bedrooms.
Large two bedrooms (1,500 square feet plus) and three+ bedrooms are stronger, and less available, than ever before. I don't know if "Buyer" is a broker, but you still can't find affordable 3+ bedrooms at reasonable prices in a good neighborhood. Prices on these babies are higher than even 3-4 months ago, and I don't see any increase in inventory on large family style apartments.
Posted by Wes | April 3, 2008 9:58 AM
What I see is in line with Wes & anon #4..3+ BR market is still very tight! Trend is clearly rising. Thats the important takeaway
Posted by Noah | April 3, 2008 12:21 PM
I should say, I've never been more comfortable as a P
Posted by anon | April 3, 2008 2:00 PM
Wes: "but you still can't find affordable 3+ bedrooms at reasonable prices in a good neighborhood. Prices on these babies are higher than even 3-4 months ago, and I don't see any increase in inventory on large family style apartments."
Word up. Noah has to admit that prices are up, up, up, but wants to keep telling buyer clients that prices will fall. It's what they want to hear, but it's not true. Prices now have to fall about 10 percent, since Noah said prices will fall, just to break even. You heard it here first, prices Q4 will be higher than Q1, for median co-op resale.
Anon - I have posted here for about 8-9 months, since I found this site during my research during my buying process, and always under the same handle ("Buyer"). I believe Noah can confirm this for you. I work in finance. I paid cash for a 3-bed in the central Village last fall. Sold my 2 bed uptown shortly afterwards, top price ever for a 2 bed in the building. Show me a true 1700 foot plus 3 bed (with set back terrace) for less than 2 mill, doorman, top school near transport with all open windows and a landmarked view. Please document the falling prices with real listings. The data says prices are up across the board - one-beds, studios, 3-beds. co-ops, condos. You name it. Link a listing that says otherwise.
Of course buyers want lower prices. They may or may not get them. 6500 inventory is nothing. If it goes over 8000, with lots of family 3-beds among them, then I will accept prices likely to soften a bit.
But - do you want your money in stocks, bonds, cash, hedgefunds or NYC real estate? I have all of them, but feel quite safe with my NYC real estate.
I don't even think 1-beds will drop much. All the boomers are retiring to the city after selling their 'burb home.
Posted by Buyer | April 3, 2008 7:59 PM
I know this is kind of a strange comment, and I'll admit that it demonstrates that I really need to find a life, but I follow the StreetEasy new listings rather zealously, and I happened to notice that Elliman (the company who for some reason recently gave up listing number of bedrooms in a unit) has given up listing at all (at least since 03/31) in StreetEasy. Also, Elliman tends to list in StreetEasy a couple of days behind it's listings in the NYTimes.
This adds (unless StreetEasy is already capturing these units, I don't know how their system works, so I could be wrong) about 125 more units over the last three days, more if one accounts for the lag. (OK, I'll admit, I did a rough count using the NY Times database. Curiosity killed the cat, BUT satisfaction brought it back.) This may be nothing, but I found it curious.
Posted by Brenda | April 3, 2008 8:03 PM
you got me. I guess the jig is up
Posted by Noah | April 3, 2008 8:04 PM
Buyer,
Crazy talk. The city is no longer that enticing to boomers retiring to the city, and will become much less so when the services are no longer so freely available because of the economy. Retiring boomers hit their stride returning about three years ago. I haven't heard that much about their return since. Plus, many of the traditional retirement markets are now DIRT cheap, AND we have out own retiring baby boomers who may very well be looking for a change of scenery. With their investments tanking, they may NEED to sell to have the cash to live, and to MOVE. Many people have mandatory retirement ages imposed by their employers.
There is a terrible shortage of school spots available, at every level. Preschools hit this year, kindergarten was awful, but is expected to truly suck next year, and I don't even want to speculate about the number of talented public middle school students who are going to be looking for spots due to the betterment of the elementary school system (certain schools, of course) in the next few years. Oh, but of course we have plenty of money to build the additional schools we need. We will have an AMAZING overabundance of the 3+ bedroom apartment in 3-5 years, what with our boomers retiring and the new construction occurring.
Posted by Brenda | April 3, 2008 8:16 PM
Brenda - You are a cheery sort. Have you considered buying in dirt cheap Florida or Arizona? The main problem with that plan, is you need to live in - Florida or Arizona. That's the catch, so to speak.
In 3-5 years there is an overabundance of large apartments (even though they are only 6 percent of the Manhattan RE market). How do you figure? These people retire to Florida? They move to Maplewood? All once their kids graduate elementary school?
Manhattan has the jobs and the money and this will only continue. Read Richard Florida's work. "Superstar" cities attract talent that adds value in the modern economy. This does not happen in Arizona.
Barring a rise in crime in the city, I see no reason for 2 career couples to ever want to move back the burbs en masse.
Again, Q4 beats Q1 for co-op median resale. You heard it here first. Noah will be here to explain that up does not mean up, but it will be up nevertheless.
Posted by Buyer | April 3, 2008 9:58 PM
No, Buyer, I'm not particularly cheery. I'm fairly angry, and probably not for the reasons you'd think. I think the Street has alot of explaining to do, along with the Fed, the Administration, the mortgage industry, the credit rating agencies, the monolines, etc.
$33000 a year per child and rising for one year of private school? Falling prices in Westchester and NJ? A city that arbitrarily just told school districts to cut spending, with Bloomberg saying that any financial organization can find a percent or so to shave?
Capital projects halting because there's no money? 200,000 commercial banking jobs being lost, who knows how many Ibankers and corporate attorneys? How many retirees can continue to afford Manhattan? Tax abatements beginning to phase down, affecting resale prices in new developments?
As to Manhattan prices, well we'll just have to see, but right now I see alot of developments with alot of inventory, and much of it is not yet "released." The fringe areas, such as Harlem, LIC, Williamsburg and Downtown Brooklyn are looking kind of frightening. Most of these developments are looking for the same sort of dollar, the highly paid young professional. The other Manhattan and Riverdale developments are looking for the highly paid young professional and the VERY highly paid professionals with families. This is not an infinite subset of the population.
AND the construction continues. There was an article recently, I think in NYMag (you can link from here), about how the upcoming change in the 421a tax abatement laws has continued to goose development.
AND there was a sobering article in the NYTimes (you can also link from here) about how more New Yorkers than was thought may be less than prime. 28% of loans written for NYC (I know, this includes the boroughs) were written with piggy-back HELOCs. I can't help but think that tightening credit standards will do nothing positive for the new construction condo market.
Posted by Brenda | April 4, 2008 5:27 AM
Buyer - now I understand why you're pumping the market so aggressively:
YOU JUST BOUGHT!!!!!
It is crystal clear to me now.
Look, I hope you love your apartment, and god knows if I had just bought this past fall (good god) I would not be torturing myself by following the market.
My advice to you, Buyer, is to enjoy your apartment and don't pay attention to the market. Don't read blogs, don't follow inventory/price cuts. Just enjoy your place and stay long term.
If you intend to flip, however, I would say your timing was about as bad as it can get, and I would advise you to rethink your investment horizon.
Posted by anon | April 4, 2008 8:22 AM
anon - Do you own or rent? For how long? You seem like this blog to have some cognitive dissonance going - prices are up. Up, up, up. Not just averages or big apartments or condos or 15 CPW. All apartments, all categories in prime Manhattan. I can't help you if you buy on the Gowanus canal because a broker tells you it is the next hot thing. Prime Manhattan co-ops are up in all categories. People don't flip co-ops, that's why there are almost none of them for sale, but if I did, I would be ahead right now by at least 10 percent maybe more.
Posted by buyer | April 4, 2008 10:28 PM
Brenda,
You have good ¢, and you are not the only one who is angry. Channel it into something positive and make a difference even if it is only a small thing. It helps, and small things have a way of growing. :D
Posted by CR | April 5, 2008 1:03 AM
Buyer - look, if it helps you feel better about your recent purchase to tell yourself that the market is still booming, that's fine. Don't let me get in your way.
All I can share with you are my own observations, which is that properties are sitting longer on the market, price reductions are in full force - they are actually accelerating, even compared to the fall, and the credit markets are frozen. I have been to many many open houses, as I prefer to understand the market well before I purchase, and loads of brokers have been telling me that prices are negotiable. This is a 180 degree change from even last fall. The market has changed dramatically.
So there is NO rush to buy. We potential buyers are extraordinarily comfortable watching the landscape get better for us by the day. I save myself money every day by doing this.
The recent articles are only used by brokers to pump prices up and recent buyers (such as yourself) to rationalize perhaps an ill-timed purchase. Everyone else who's close to the market knows the real story with recent prices (see Urbandigs' excellent column of several days ago painstakingly explaining why those articles are putting forth misleading statistics).
Anyway, again, if you just bought, you should enjoy your place and avoid reading about the market. Or you can continue to post about the wisdom of your purchase, how the market's "going up, up, up", and look foolish among readers who know you're rationalizing a recent purchase.
Posted by anon | April 5, 2008 11:28 AM
Buyer,
Actually, for the first time in a couple of years I'm seeing some much more reasonable deals on Tribeca loft resales, about $1000 per square foot for 1600 sf properties. These had all but disappeared until now.
Also, go onto StreetEasy and take a look at those properties with reduced prices. Hopefully brokers are at least trying to price new listings properly (they obviously need the cooperation of their clients) so recent properties shouldn't have as many price cuts, but many of them do. Look at the coop resale market, specifically, where some people may actually need to sell.
CR - thank you. You are right. I've worked in soup kitchens before, in hospitals with children, and it DOES matter. I'll be thinking of how I might contribute. Our daughter is older now, and I finally have more time to do something, so I'll have to commit myself to helping. It SO angers me, however, that those who have been responsible for our welfare have chosen only to take so rapaciously.
Posted by Brenda | April 5, 2008 8:10 PM
With all that free time on your hands now might be the perfect moment to enter the political arena. Someone has to get elected...it might as well be someone who actually gives a damn about something other than their ego.
Posted by CR | April 5, 2008 11:58 PM
Buyer - your words are definitely not indicative of the current market nor what the market has been in the past 1-3 months. Every broker I speak to is very slow. Sales are not selling as originally thought. Prices are coming down to reality. Its NOT that general prices are asking below last years levels, its that overpriced properties that USED TO SELL, are not selling! Plus, some deals are going at below last years levels.
The fact that sellers STILL expect 10% appreciation since this time last year, is what is causing a rise in inventory. If sellers keep this up, they are in for a rude awakening as inventory will continue to trend higher during the course of 2008.
I truly think that you do not understand the effect on buyer confidence that is going on right now, at the same time that we are in a recession and the lending market has gotten extremely tough! I am about to lose a deal because my buyer cant secure a committment; credit score excellent but banks now require very conservative debt/service ratios and if you cant document that, well then you are out of luck.
Posted by Noah | April 6, 2008 9:38 AM
Noah - I just did a Natefind.com search on average Village post-war 3-bedrooms of 1600-2000 feet (listing). They are asking 2.4 to 2.6 million, more than 25% above what I paid last summer. Maybe they have to "cut" their asking price 15%. Still way above last summer.
Perhaps after Bear people feel they should get a discount. Maybe it will happen. But so far, median prices are way up from when this site has been predicting a crash. Prices have to fall 10 percent from current transactions last quarter, just to break even from when this site suggested timing the Manhattan real estate market.
Buyers always want cheaper prices. But sellers at present don't agree. We shall see. I still claim median co-op resale is higher Q4 than Q1. (Also, if, as I did, you have to sell your old place when you buy a new place, "timing" makes even less sense.)
I still don't see those cheap family apartments people keep telling me about. Could someone provide a link, please??
Posted by Buyer | April 6, 2008 10:31 AM
Buyer - well I dont know natefind's reach for their listings, nor do I view asking prices as a leading indicator of a market (a seller can ask whatever they want, its where it sells that is important), and I wouldnt even look to PRICING data as a indicator of current health of Manhattan real estate; given the lagging nature of the metric.
With that said, and as I ALWAYS stated here on urbandigs (go look at my posts from early 2007 and you will notice I was bullish given very low inventory and very strong sales trends and activity), I look at inventory trends + sales activity from field + sales volume for signs of health!
Period. Jonathan Miller obviously thinks the same way. Also, if your simply talking about W Village or Chelsea, or SoHo, of course those tight and high demand areas will not be indicative of overall Manhattan as a whole. W Village is one of the most highly desireable and lowest inventories neighborhoods of Manhattan. We must look at it from bigger picture. And bigger pictures in y view shows a hit to buyer confidence (not a depression style hit, just a decline in confidence in general), slower sales volume, and rising inventory. I use this as leading indicators into where the market may be headed. I dont see those cheap family apts either, and I dont think you will until 2009! 2008 will be the year inventory rises, as I stated many times, and clearly its happening this way so far.
Posted by Noah | April 6, 2008 3:36 PM
Interesting post. This leads me to believe that co-op price changes are a better indication of the market since new developments are all condos, and not co-ops.
Posted by Bee Dub | June 22, 2008 12:48 PM