Timing The Market: The Wait & See

Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on April 23, 2008 at 10.07 AM

A: Real estate is a personal decision. Timing the market is a fairyland. In a perfect world, one could buy Manhattan real estate at the bottom, sell at the top, rent for a few years, and upgrade after the market corrected a bit and some deals popped up. Now wake up! Timing the market is impossible to do, so don't even try it. It will make an already complex investment decision even more complex; yes, I view your house as an investment that you live in, and that should be a part of your portfolio. If you don't like the investment, rent. If you prefer to own, build wealth, and take advantage of tax benefits, then buy. But don't try to perfectly time it as that will cloud the overall decision. Instead, focus on what works for you and finding the best product in the price point that is out there and getting it for the best price possible! Originally Published January 28th, 2008.

This is for those that are looking for a new home to use as their primary residence. While I discuss what interests me here on UrbanDigs, including what is going on outside our walls, I don't want that to cloud your investment decision. Just because I made it my point to focus on the credit crisis since last July, and hopefully now you understand why, doesn't mean I expect Manhattan housing to crash 50%, I DON'T! Lord knows there are enough people out there that are making this assumption for me.

Deciding whether to pull the trigger should be a clear decision. A decision that is made after assessing four very important personal criteria:

a) Liquid Assets After Closing Costs
b) Salary / Debt-to-Income Ratio
c) Job Security
d) Timeline To Hold/Own

Assuming you made the decision to seriously consider buying, you must now figure out if you can afford it with your total salary, if you have enough liquid assets leftover after the transaction, if your job is secure, and if you intend to own/hold the asset for at least 4 years. Let me just briefly go into each one:

Liquid Assets After Closing Costs: Do you know what the buy side closing costs are going to be? Many brokers don't discuss this with their clients until they get very close to bidding, and for some buyers that # comes as a shock. So, better off knowing before hand how much OUT OF POCKET you will be to actually buy the condo or co-op. A rough estimate is about 4.25% of purchase price for a Condo, 5.75% of purchase price for a new-dev Condo (assuming pass down of sponsor costs), and about 1.75% of purchase price for a Co-op. This does not include points and is dependent on how much you are putting down as well so use as a very general guide.

Now, the down payment. After you add up the down payment + estimated closing costs, how much money do you have leftover in your liquid accounts; 401K/Retirement accounts not included. You can convert some retirement money into liquid money, but there likely will be a penalty for doing so.

QUICK TIP FOR USING ROTH IRA FUNDS PENALTY FREE
: For those with a ROTH IRA account over 5 years old & plan to purchase their first home, you may use up to $10,000 penalty free for the down payment. Click the link for more details on qualifying for this distribution incentive.

Generally, you want at least 8-12 months of MORTGAGE + MAINT/TAXES leftover in liquid assets to buy a condo, and probably more to pass a co-op board. You can do it with less liquid for a condo, say 6 months total payments in liquid, but you really do want to leave yourself some security just in case when the deal is done.

Salary / Debt-To-Income Ratio: Now, take your total expected monthly payments and add in any minimum debt payments you currently have. Divide this total monthly expense by the total gross income you are bringing in each month (I usually add in bonus if its set in your employment contract, but acceptance of this trend is likely to change).

Here is a hypothetical to give you an idea:

TOTAL MONTHLY PAYMENTS ---> $4,000
TOTAL MIN DEBT PAYMENTS ---> $650
TOTAL GROSS INCOME ---------> $15,000
=================================

$4,650 / $15,000 ---> 0.31 or 31%

This person's debt/income ratio is 31%. Generally, you want to keep your debt/income ratio UNDER 28%! Anything over that may become a problem either for the lending gods or the board gods! If you do go over 28%, you may be able to still do the deal if you can offset this with bulky liquid assets leftover after closing. But, anything over 33% is probably going to be a problem for any co-op board. Condo's of course are less stringent leaving the buyer to gauge their own comfort level as opposed to the board's/lender's comfort level!

Job Security: Please make sure your comfortable with your job; both in keeping it and staying in this location. One of the biggest destroyers of wealth, besides divorce, is being forced to sell your largest asset because of job loss or relocation! If you have to sell quickly, you will have to be flexible on pricing!

Make sure your job is secure before making such a big investment decision!

Timeline To Hold/Own: General rule of thumb is 5 years. Its a good rule, although I can live with one less. If you are going to hold the property for at least 4 years, and you meet all the above criteria AND YOU WANT TO BUY AND OWN YOUR OWN HOME, then you have very compelling reasons to pull the trigger!

Since buying & selling real estate incurs transaction costs, you want to have time on your side to both build wealth and take advantage of tax benefits! Ideally, you want to be able to sell the asset when YOU choose to, not when you have to. A longer timeline to own gives you the freedom to pick & choose your exit points.

The wait & see attitude generally comes from those concerned about the economy, asset deflation, buying more then they can afford, or just putting most of their eggs into one asset class. For these people, buying may not be the best decision if it will result in large amounts of stress and a negative effect on the quality of your living standards. The last thing you want is to argue about the new apartment you bought that caused you to not enjoy life as much as you did before. If you don't qualify for the above 4 criteria to buy, then you shouldn't be buying in the first place! If you think you'll need a bigger place in 1-2 years and can't afford that larger property now, then you shouldn't be buying!

Happiness is still more important than money, so be sure you can find a place that not only you can afford, but one that makes you happy and hopefully is scalable so that you can grow into it should your family grow in the future!

Comments (46)

Excellent post! Very helpful to me and I can see how it would be helpful to any buyer in New York City.

Posted by anon | January 28, 2008 10:32 AM

One of the features of the economic stimulus package fashioned yesterday by Congress and the Bush administration would provide guarantees to more -- and much larger -- mortgages in an effort to boost the housing market. But it also would expose the nation's two government-sponsored mortgage companies to greater credit risk.

With defaults rising, investors lately have shunned nearly all mortgages not guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They assume that the two companies, which are private but were created by Congress, would get a bailout in a crisis.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy from lenders only mortgages that conform to their standards. Currently, that means the largest mortgage they will buy on single-family homes in the continental U.S. is $417,000. Their standards on down payments and verification of income are stricter than were those of many lenders during the housing boom.

Posted by RealestateMaster | January 28, 2008 10:46 AM

Noah,

nice to see you got a mention in this recent article talking about the 'possibility' of a slowdown from foreign buyers

http://nymag.com/realestate/realestatecolumn/43261/

yep, if their local economy isn't doing well, they sure ain't gonna speculate on Manhattan condos right now

Posted by uwsider | January 28, 2008 10:49 AM

uwsider - thanks..yet I get this all the time from those that haven't been reading UD since beginning and dont know me when I was bullish on market:

"You are the only broker I know that is working night and day to create a negative environment for the purchase of real estate. If I was management at Halstead, I would have a good talk with you: Be a gloom and doom blogger or sell real estate, don't do both."

Apparently, I am a doom & gloom blogger and predicting NYC will crash 50%! I had no idea!

Posted by Noah | January 28, 2008 11:11 AM

Now and then, it's good to see you write from both sides Noah. Don't be too baited by comments into saying too much in those "other forums". Keep up the good work.

Posted by spaceboy | January 28, 2008 11:36 AM

Great blog. Thanks for the information. Ignore the other bloggers that are negative. You are giving honest information, and it in the end, it will serve you well in business and in life.
I saw your quote in nymag. Interesting. I still think the odds are pretty good for a strong spring/summer.

Posted by d | January 28, 2008 11:58 AM

WELCOME TO http://www.QUICKSTUBS.COM

THIS EASY TO USE COMPUTER PROGRAM WAS CREATED FOR THE SMALL BUSINESS OWNER IN MIND! FINALLY, A COMPUTER PROGRAM THAT WILL MAKE PERSONALIZED PAYCHECK STUBS INSTANTLY!

ALSO YOU CAN USE THIS SMALL BUSINESS PAYROLL SOLUTION TO

FAKE HOW MUCH YOU MAKE OR FAKE THE DOCS YOU NEED!

This computer program does it all! Input the company name (with company logo if desired), name of employee, hourly salary then ..... PRESTO.......INSTANT CUSTOMIZED PAYCHECK STUBS!!!
http://www.FAKEPAYCHECKSTUBS.com
Buy this computer program and print out personalized instant paycheck stubs for your new or existing business! Verify income for any one.... anytime! Authentic looking stubs will FOOL EVERYONE or 100% Money Back Guarenteed!

INSTANTLY print out PAYCHECK STUBS in MINUTES!

IT IS THIS EASY!!!

Use this program to verify income or to show proof of income!!!!
FOR A ONE TIME FEE OF $49.95 THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM IS YOURS!

DONT DELAY AND GET THIS SMALL BUSINESS PAYCHECK SOLUTION TODAY!
THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY DOWNLOADED ONTO YOUR COMPUTER APON COMPLETION OF THIS TRANSACTION !!!



CLICK HERE TO PURCHASE

ONLY $49.95



QUICKSTUBS.COM OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MISUSE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROGRAM ONCE BUYER HAS FILLED IT OUT WITH THE INFORMATION THEY CHOOSE TO USE - THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM IS INTENDED TO CREATE NOVELTY PAYCHECK STUBS FOR ENTERTAINMENT, AND AMUSEMENT PURPOSES ONLY!!

http://www.FAKEPAYCHECKSTUBS.com

Upon completion of this transaction, you will be emailed your computer program!

All SALES ARE FINAL!

SAMPLE PAYCHECK PAYCHECK STUB TEMPLATE FOR SMALL BUSINESS WHO NEED HELP IN FILING TAXES FOR SMALL BUSINESS TAX ! PROVE SALARY ONINE BUY USING THIS SMALL BUSINESS COMPUTER PROGRAM SAMPLE PAY PAYCHECK CHECK STUB TEMPLATE FOR ALL YOUR SMALL BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS PAYROLL PROGRAM BUSINESS PAY STUB AND TAXES NEEDS! COMPUTER PROGRAM FILE SMALL BUSINESS TAXES PAY TAXES ONLINE BUY INSTANT BUSINESS PAY STUB COMPUTER PROGRAM PAYROLL SOLUTION PAY TAXES ONINE PAYCHECK SOFTWARE PAY CHECK SOFTWARE TAX SOFTWARE TAX QUICKBOOK BUSINESS SOFTWARE PAYROLL SOFTWARE SAMPLE BUSINESS SOFTWARE PAY CHECK PROGRAM SOFTWARE DOWNLOAD CHECK STUB COPIES CHECK STUB COPIES CHECK STUB COPY CHECK STUB SOFTWARE PRINTABLE PAY STUBS PRINTABLE PAY CHECK STUBS CHECK STUBS TURBO SOFTWARE TAX SOFTWARE CHECK STUBS SOFTWARE CHECK STUB SOFTWARE SAMPLE PAYROLL CHECKS SAMPLE PAYROLL STUB

fake pay stubs fake payroll stubs fake check stubs make fake pay stub bad credit loan instant proof of income letter fake check car loan real estate refinance consolodate now no credit need pay stub make pay stub create pay stub fake check buy online buy online fake make pay stubs fake payroll stubs fake check stubs fake id ids home loan car loan cash advance cash loan auto loan proof of income novelty easy bad credit bad credit loan sample paycheck stub make sample paycheck stubs fake id ids car refinance home refinance state id identity create same day payday slip buy house home auto vehicle state create template sample child support solution prove income proof of income letter child support sample fake pay stubs fake payroll stubs fake check stubs make fake pay stub bad credit loan instant proof of income letter fake check car loan real estate refinance consolidate now mortgage fraud check scam no credit need pay stub make pay stub create pay stub fake check fake make pay stubs fake payroll stubs fake check stubs fake id ids home loan car loan cash advance cash loan auto loan proof of income novelty easy bad credit bad credit loan sample paycheck stub make sample paycheck stubs fake id ids car refinance home refinance state id identity create same day payday slip buy house home auto vehicle state create template sample scam scam child support solution prove income proof of income letter child support sample template sample child support solution http://www.FAKEPAYCHECKSTUBS.com

Posted by dd | January 28, 2008 11:59 AM

Nice analysis, Mr. Digs. May I quibble?

Seems to me that your advice to those people who want a larger place in a year or two but can’t afford it yet means that they should try to time the market. How so? Because the only way they win by waiting (assuming they can buy something smaller now and be comfortable) is they can comfortably park their assets in a place that will do better than their real estate will do (where would that be??) AND if the real estate market declines.

If the real estate market improves while they are waiting, the gap between their resources and that larger property is likely to grow. If they had bought something smaller, instead of waiting, their appreciation in that property will probably leave them a smaller gap. If the real estate market is flat while they are waiting, their economic position is likely to be neutral for buying that larger space, but they will look better to a coop (especially) if they are already ‘successful’ coop shareholders.

While it is not as simple as I outline here (particularly for pepole concerned about their future income), I think the better suggestion is that someone who plans to remain in Manhattan (in that new apartment or a successor) for a long period of time (10 years) runs a greater risk of not being able to catch up to the market if they wait until they can afford that larger apartment. Indeed, there is an argument to be made that *especially* if you expect to be living somewhere else in 5 or more years, your Manhattan real estate equity is going to be even more valuable if you move to the near suburbs, and even more valuable still if you arbitrage to a much lower priced housing market.

Love to hear your thoughts on the ability of your hypothetical buyer-waiting-for-the-larger-apartment to park their current assets where they can comfortably predict they will out-perform the real estate market. If Manhattan real estate loses 10-15% in the next year or two because we are in a recession, where is the stock market?

THX for making me think more systematically about this issue.

Posted by Sandy Matsatingly | January 28, 2008 12:07 PM

HOW did I spell my own name wrong?? (yikes)

Posted by Sandy Mattingly | January 28, 2008 12:12 PM

Sandy - love it. Excellent question. I think we need to consider two things when looking at the point you raise:

1) opportunity cost
2) buy/sell transaction fees

Since you are wondering about the hypotheital buyer or the buyer who cant quite afford the true 2BR that they need, but may be able to afford a large 1BR/1.5BTH. Also lets say they are expecting and in 5 years they will absolutely NEED a 2BR/2BTH property; this is the situation.

To NOT BUY will likely result in less losses than TO BUY. The reason lies in the top 2 things I mention above.

OPPORTUNITY COST - By buying, a large portion of your money is in an asset that could rise, stay flat, or fall. By not buying, you could park it somewhere for at least 4-5% for now.

TRANSACTION FEES - what will it cost to buy & sell the large 1BR, then buy and sell the larger 2BR? You must take into account the 7-8% sell side costs of purchase price because in this type of analysis the deal must close to retrieve assets if we are to analyze the investment decision.

If you wait, you only have one set of buy/sell fees. So, to rent and wait, you are saving:

a) 11-12% total transaction fees for condo
b) 8.75% - 9.75% total transaction fees for co-op

That right there is a pretty hefty #. To make it work, we need to estimate appreciation, and it would probably have to be about 8-10% a year each year to both bypass opportunity cost that is earned by not doing deal and savings of transaction fees for initial purchase.

am i lost now?

Posted by Noah | January 28, 2008 12:17 PM

Noah,

This is a very helpful post. I have two questions regarding the debt/income ratio that you discuss above.

1. I am assuming you exclude mortage and/or real estate tax deductions for purposes of this analysis (I know that the bank does). For example, any mortgage I would take out would be a jumbo and given our tax bracket I would expect an approximately $2,100 taxbenefit each month at the beginning our loan (it will phase out over time). Am I correct in not taking that into account forp urposes of debt/income even though it is a very real beenfit (and one of the great benefits of buying).

2. Assuming one sticks to your 28% recommendation, that means that you can be spending over 50% of your net take home each month on housing. Particularly at the beginning of the year, when we are paying max on social security taxes from our payroll, my wife and I probably clear less than 50% of our earnings net of all taxes. So, if we are at even 25% debt/income, we will pay over 50% of our net on housing. Now, whether that is acceptable depends a lot on what your gross is. The higher it is the more comfortable one should be that 50% of that large number is still enough to cover all expenses ex housing. But as a general rule, does 50% of net income seem to high to spend on housing.

Thanks.

Colgin

Posted by Colgin | January 28, 2008 12:28 PM

Hey Colgin! Long time..thanks for commenting.

I do NOT exclude the tax benefits of owning. Either do co-op boards! Reality is, you need to pay the full amount monthly, and realize the tax advantage next April when you save on the interest payment & re taxes deductions.

At very least, I take the more conservative route by doing it this way and I know this is how co-op boards look at the ratio. Yes it is a very real benefit, but not for those that cant afford the monthly payments and barely make it to time where savings are realized. Thats a red flag for coops.

2. No i dont think so. sounds about right to me, but as you said, there are other variables there that could play into what is considered acceptable or not by boards/lenders

Posted by Noah | January 28, 2008 12:36 PM

If you wait, you only have one set of buy/sell fees. So, to rent and wait, you are saving:

a) 11-12% total transaction fees for condo
b) 8.75% - 9.75% total transaction fees for co-op

INVENTORY???????????

Right now, customes that have been on the fence for the last two years are snapping up 3BRs+. They have the knowledge and understand the marektplace.

Sit on the fence, you may have the money, but there won't be any apartment for you.

Don't forget the Euro is at almost 1.5 to 1. What happens if its 2-1 in a year?

MY ADVICE

Buy the biggest apartment you can afford now! Borrow from mom or dad or father-in-law if you have to. This apartment (asset -in Noah language) will be worth a fortune while you wait out to time the market.

Look at Tribeca, after the World Trade Center, it dipped for about 30 days!

Get a grip - Follow your instincts -

Posted by anon | January 28, 2008 12:41 PM

Don't you also take into account the interest on your mortgage while figuring out the opportunity costs?

Posted by gumby | January 28, 2008 12:41 PM

hey if you can afford it, do it! Family gifts count to me! Why not. But if you dont have access to this capital, and cant afford it, obviously DO NOT buy the biggest house you can afford if you will outgrow the size in a few years and have to sell before the 4 year minimum. Thats where transaction fees will get you, especially if you go back to renting because you still cant afford a larger place.

Posted by Noah | January 28, 2008 12:46 PM

FWIW, when I said "I assume you exclude tax deductions" I meant that I assume that you ignore such deductions, i.e., you look at gross payments, for purposes of debt/income. So, you are confirming what I had assumed.

Posted by Colgin | January 28, 2008 12:48 PM

oh sorry..YES, I confirm what you said then

Posted by Noah | January 28, 2008 12:49 PM

While you are figuring out transaction costs, the price of a 3Br that you want to sell to get a bigger apartment and a house in Shelter Island for you and your family, - will go through the roof.

And even if you don't sell, at least you can wait out any market comfortably in an apartment that you could grow into rather than waiting in a rental.

You fail to understand the thinking process and physcologgy, of keeping up with the Jones, is Jr in the right school, playing with the right children, like it or not, these things are factors in New York City.

There is a social cost to being in a rental, ask any one in New York City who is not computing transaction costs.

Posted by anon | January 28, 2008 1:30 PM

Sandy,

I recently ran a buy v. rent analysis factoring in all the closing costs and other costs necessary to own. I did this for a 2BR in the $1.5M range.

Noah is correct. In order merely to break even, the value of the apartment would have to appreciate approximately 10% per year.

I would not make that bet.

Sandy, do you ever have buyside clients? I ask because what I've outlined is pretty fundamental stuff, and I think it would be virtually negligent for a buyside broker not to know how too look at the numbers.

Posted by anon | January 28, 2008 1:38 PM

I should clarify on the previous post - that is to break even after two years.

Posted by anon | January 28, 2008 1:39 PM

Good point about the transaction costs - 3 sets in my scenario (buy now + sell later + buy) but only 1 in yours (buy later).

But you ducked on the where-else-to-put-your-assets (safely) question. While you say “you could park it somewhere for at least 4-5% for now” you sound like you are talking about a savings account -- is that what people do in real life? If you are talking about the stock market, yes ... people *could* get at least a 4-5% return, but in a recession that drives down Manhattan real estate values how many civilians are going to get 4-5% picking stocks, or in mutual funds?

I am less sanguine than you about people being able to do better in non-real estate assets in that scenario, but I totally agree that they should be informed and make their own choice.

Plus there is the idiosyncrasy of personality involved. The Trader types tend to value everything in monetary (“investment”) terms; other people assign a higher value to the psychological benefits of “owning” a home and controlling their environment more.

THX for playing along.

Posted by Sandy Mattingly | January 28, 2008 1:51 PM

Question for you: Reading over the post/comments, I don't understand everything, but I don't see any mention of current rent payments factoring in. If you're paying $3K/month in rent for your Manhattan 1BR ($36K/year), shouldn't that factor in? If your out-of-pocket costs are 5% on a $600K 1BR, that's only one year of rent payments. So even if your new place doesn't appreciate at all and you move out after four years, it still seems to me like you'd be coming out ahead because of tax breaks, built-up equity, and no more rent.

Thoughts?

Posted by Renter | January 28, 2008 1:52 PM

Renter,

What you propose is not a fair comparison. You need to compare the "lost" rent payments with the "lost" nondeductible portion of your interests payments as well. It is not fair to stack rent up just against buying and selling transaction costs. In your rent v. buy analysis you also need to reflect interests payments in the buy scenario.

Colgin

Posted by Colgin | January 28, 2008 2:46 PM

what is the differance between 1.75% closing fees with a coop and 9.75% transaction fee for a coop.....whats included in the transaction fee?

Posted by michael | January 28, 2008 4:39 PM

Thanks Colgin, your right. Sorry such a n00b.

Posted by Renter | January 28, 2008 4:43 PM

Noah,
Thank you for the above posting, very helpful as always. For the debt to income ratio do you think it is reasonable to include the bonus for both my husband and myself in the income total? I am looking to buy and our income doubles if I include the bonuses. I don't have a bonus in my employment contract, but my husband does, but only the first year (he recently got a new job). However my bonuses have been steady for 7 years. What will most coops and banks accept?
Thank you

Posted by Teri | January 28, 2008 4:52 PM

Teri - thx..I would! I would present it to the seller broker that way, and if there is any question, have them call the managing agent to see if the board would look negatively on the bonus that is proven by tax returns yet not shown on employment contract. If your letter of employment can include that part of your salary, should be good to go!

good luck

Posted by Noah | January 28, 2008 5:09 PM

Noah, I think you're doing fabulous reporting (and you're not particularly bearish on Manhattan, I'm more so). The advice you give is advice that many would have been wise to follow over the past 5 or so years. This social stigma some mention to renting is simply foolish. The desire for perceived advancement, both economic and social, has caused many to overspend.

I would LOVE to own, and I have approximately 14 out of the last 18 or so years, but not if it increases my after-tax expenditures by more than double (also, some people will put themselves into the alternative minimum tax scenario with the additional real estate taxes, thereby decreasing their savings). I'd prefer to rent and go to Europe (with quite a bit left over for savings, much more than I'd be getting now for principal) for a few weeks each summer.

The simple savings account is not looking particularly remunerative, but it's one of the better options currently for those who don't want to play the markets. Gold and foreign currencies, chosen wisely, are other potential options.

Keep up the good work. The answers aren't always simple, and a given answer will only work for a certain number of people. Your answers recognize that.

Posted by Brenda | January 28, 2008 7:59 PM

thx Brenda! great to see you around here so often!

Posted by Noah | January 28, 2008 8:19 PM

It's this simple; people buying in the Manhattan real estate market right now will more than likely end up deeply regretting their decision to do so within a few years. That's my opinion, if you think it's a good time to buy I think you'll have a big selection of properties to select from over the next six months or so.

Good luck!

Posted by anon | January 28, 2008 10:50 PM

I find it amusing that everyone ducked Sally's excellent question. Where exactly is everyone putting their money if its not in real estate? If you're scared we're going into a recession, I hope its not in the stock market/mutual funds. Okay so not real estate and not the stock market. So that leaves bonds or cash. I don't know a lot about bonds, but I'm assuming the rates are dropping, along with the interest rates for cash...

So I'd like to reiterate the question? If you don't like real estate, where are you putting your money? My guess is cash.

Again, I'm not an expert but with the Fed cutting rates, that will lead to inflation eventually. This means hard assets will increase in value (including real estate). With cash earning 4% then 3%, then 2%, is that realistically going to be able to help you save up? At some point you'll be losing money in cash due to inflation.

Quite a pickle.

Posted by spaceboy | January 29, 2008 1:49 AM

great point space..since prob is with housing and securities that stretch out to wall st, its understandable why some are considering waiting for clouds to clear to pull trigger.

Me, Im 50% cash, 25% gold, 25% equities and of equities Im 60% long large cap tech/ag and 40% short financials via etf's

Posted by Noah | January 29, 2008 8:46 AM

what is the differance between 1.75% closing fees with a coop and 9.75% transaction fee for a coop.....whats included in the transaction fee?

Posted by michael | January 29, 2008 8:54 AM

michael - I dont understand the question. To buy a co-op you are looking at generally 1.75% of purchase price on buy side. To selland close the transaction, you are looking at between 7-8% fees assuming you use a broker at 6% commission; plus other fees.

In total, the deal is costing about 9-10% to close! So, we must calculate that into any analysis if we are comparing to renting which doesn't have those fees.

Posted by Noah | January 29, 2008 9:27 AM

noah...i understand now....one if for buyer and the other if for seller and includes commission...thanks

Posted by michael | January 29, 2008 10:06 AM

Noah - ahhh - the SKF! god bless that thing...

Posted by brm | January 29, 2008 10:21 AM

SKF is crazy volatile..its down like 40 pts in 2 weeks.

Posted by Noah | January 29, 2008 2:20 PM

On sell-side costs, remember too that many buildings have flip taxes too with the average being 1-2% of total sale--not just on the profit.

Posted by kylewest | January 29, 2008 3:41 PM

**Again, I'm not an expert but with the Fed cutting rates, that will lead to inflation eventually. This means hard assets will increase in value (including real estate). With cash earning 4% then 3%, then 2%, is that realistically going to be able to help you save up? At some point you'll be losing money in cash due to inflation.**

It can be argued we are already in an inflationary environment, and that the new bonus Fed rate cuts puts us in a hyper-inflationary crisis mode.

**General rule of thumb is 5 years. Its a good rule, although I can live with one less. If you are going to hold the property for at least 4 years, and you meet all the above criteria AND YOU WANT TO BUY AND OWN YOUR OWN HOME, then you have very compelling reasons to pull the trigger!**

As long as you expect the market conditions to remain the same or get better in 5 years (or whatever your target exit date is).

Currently, the Fed, the Treasury secretary and WS have behaved in way that give you pause to believe that this will be the case.

And longer term, let's say 10 years - wouldn't you be better off buying a co-op than a Condo that has tax abatement expiring in 10-15 years. What will be the value of a condo which will have fees and charges go up 100-200% on a monthly basis.

And if co-ops are therefore the better option longer term, you are at the mercy of the current inventory which is below *normal*.

I don't believe that we are in a healthy economic environment, locally, nationally or gobally. I don't believe because the Fed doesn't believe. Historically,the past record of these inflationary crises says we are not, nor will we be in a better situation 5-10 years from now.

But, in the case of NYC, until inventory increases and until people start to lose their jobs at an exponential rate, causing people to leave the city, its difficult to say that, yes, home value will decrease in any reasonable way.

Posted by Jose | January 29, 2008 4:21 PM

Excellent comment Jose.

You'd be interested in my 421-A abatement post I did a ways back! I mentioned same topic about paying top dollar for a property that will get less affordable over time (counter is what about the savings in meantime, is it worth it!)

I published this JUNE 2006!

http://www.urbandigs.com/2007/04/biggest_scam_in.html

Posted by Noah | January 29, 2008 4:48 PM

Noah,

I really enjoy reading your posts and I think you make a lot of great predictions before they happen.

While timing the market is not a good idea longterm, it can be helpful if you can wait 1-2 years. I thought about buying last summer, but decided to wait. Now prices for what I am looking for have come down 10%, which for me is a lot.

I also have a question for you. I know you specialize in the Manhattan area. But do you see prices coming down in Brooklyn, specifically Brighton Beach? Do you know any good sites online that discuss real estate in Brooklyn?

Posted by Sam | April 23, 2008 10:46 AM

Noah,

I find it interesting that you are against timing the housing market but appear to be for timing the stock market given your asset allocation: "50% cash, 25% gold, 25% equities and of equities Im 60% long large cap tech/ag and 40% short financials via etf's"

There is nothing wrong with renting (or, like noah, having a large cash position) until conditions are favorable for investment. This is not "timing" the market... but acting in one's own interest as an informed consumer (whether a renter, an owner or investor).

Posted by anonon | April 23, 2008 11:41 AM

spaceboy said "If you don't like real estate, where are you putting your money? My guess is cash."

I am 65% cash, 35% Equities and of equities, I am 60% on Food/Agriculture stocks, 40% Emerging Markets (Brazil/Argentina)


Posted by sulfura | April 23, 2008 1:29 PM

small note regarding the comment about using tax effected monthly income in the debt/income calc.

Noah I think you responded that you had to wait until the end of the year to get the tax deduction. wouldn't it be smarter to increase my witholding allowances to reduce my tax during the year? uncle sam is not paying me interest.

I have not done this in practice, and I think the max deduction is to claim 10 exemptions(or something like that), so it's more of a question than a statement.

Posted by mike schlee | April 23, 2008 4:47 PM

aonon - I was an equities trader for 7 years. My stock trades and buying a piece of real estate is quite different.

That said, you are right and Ill never argue that there is anything wrong with renting, especially if you are uncertain about the market or feel like prices are too high. The point is, some people do not want to rent, have a longer term horizon for their investment, and find themselves in a comfortable position to buy; so, choosing to rent solely because they want to time a 5-10% decline, might prove to be the wrong decision with 12 months (or whatever) rent thrown out the window by the time they pull trigger.

That comment about my holdings is old. I am out of gold right now, lightened up my short exposure, and increased my cash exposure. I feel that we are nearing a pause in FFR and dollar may, and I repeat may, get some support. I do not want to be holding the bag if commodities priced in dollars lose the currency trade speculators. It could be very volatile.

Posted by Noah | April 23, 2008 5:20 PM

Hi Noah,

So, two of the four requirements apply to me. I have a secure job (school teacher) and plan to stay for a period of 5-7 years. The liquid assets and income-debt ratio is the issue. After closing costs on a new 2bed, 2bathroom, 2 balconies condo and corresponding parking lot near Riverdale (tax abatement inc..thanks for that famous post...lol) I'll only have 6K as an emergency fund. I don't have any present debt, but considering my monthly payment on the 255,000 mortgage, my ratio will be high. I'm thinking I can always rent the second bedroom...

Posted by new york teacher | April 28, 2008 7:36 PM

Post a comment


To help maintain the integrity of the conversation we ask that each user simply paste the keyword (below in red) into the confirmation field below. Sorry, but if you forget this step, your comments will not be saved!