Fed Cuts Funds Rate + Window By 1/4 Point
A: Before everyone out there bashes Big Ben for not acting aggressive enough, lets take a step back at what the fed probably accomplished here; given the disappointment in action & in the issued statement. In my opinion, this move was the fed's way of regaining control over the tradable markets by not delivering what was hoped for, while at the same time taking some action. This makes it more likely that the ultimate recovery will be pushed back. I admire this move because it removes a level of expectation from the markets and could set up a surprise move down the road; when it may be needed more.
According to Yahoo Finance:
The Federal Reserve cut a key interest rate by one-quarter of a percentage point Tuesday, trying to keep the country out of recession.And here too:
The reduction in the federal funds rate to 4.25 percent marked the third rate cut in the past three months. Fed officials signaled that further cuts were possible if a severe downturn in housing and a crisis in mortgage lending get worse.
Investors had been expecting policymakers would cut rates for a third straight time, though there was debate over the size of the cut. Most economists had been expecting a quarter-point cut in the benchmark federal funds rate to 4.25 percent -- but some investors were hoping for a half-point cut in the Fed's last meeting this year, and their disappointment took the market lower.The fed did NOTHING today that they could later be blamed on! They cut rates. They just didn't cut them as aggressively as the street hoped, and some economists had hoped. Cry me a river. I can sense a Cramer outburst coming.
The Fed as expected also cut the discount rate. The Fed cut the rate it charges to lend directly to banks by a quarter-point to 4.75 percent. Fed officials signaled that further cuts are possible if a severe downturn in housing and a crisis in mortgage lending worsen. Investors had sent stocks higher in recent weeks as they grew more confident in the Fed's openness to loosening its policy again.
The fed acknowledged the worsening housing & credit crisis. They acknowledged inflation risks. They acknowledged the weak dollar. And they disregarded the street's hope. They also told the street that they won't always give them what they want and at the same time, saved some precious ammunition for later on should it be needed to jolt the markets with an injection of confidence if things get real hairy.
This move may help HELOC rates a bit but prob won't bring lending rates any lower, since that market is more tied to credit quality & risk appetite these days.
It was a boring, disappointing, solid move. It was like an NFL team drafting a top rated left tackle with the 2nd pick in the NFL draft, to shore up their O-line for the running game and quarterback protection. Sure its not as exciting as drafting a star Quarterback or Running Back, but it will prove worthy later on. Sorry, its the best analogy I can think of given its playoff time in fantasy football.
What do you guys think of this move? I say the markets have more reason for rallies down the road with more rate cut ammunition at the fed's disposal.



Posted by anon
Tue Dec 11th, 2007 03:30 PM
Cramer is a rate wh*re. Congrats to the Fed for exercising restraint.
Posted by Noah
Tue Dec 11th, 2007 04:30 PM
he's getting lots of trash for this and I dont know why...it was a prudent move. No reason to be super aggressive here at all.
And why are we so scared of a recession all of a sudden? Like thats the end of the new world?
Posted by Corcoran
Tue Dec 11th, 2007 11:26 PM
For 2008 I am predicting a shift from the current 'non-active' market to a more robust seller’s market in Manhattan. A decline in the submission of permits for new developments will keep inventory levels low, while buyer demand will likely be fueled by robust Wall Street bonuses and the normalization of credit markets. Today's 1/4% cut of the prime interest rate by the Federal Reserve will spur purchasing power and is an important step in realizing a more robust market.
Posted by drtomaso
Wed Dec 12th, 2007 12:07 AM
Robust Wall St bonuses? Have you been reading the news? Merrill's write downs wiped out *5 years* of profits. They will pay just enough so people dont leave en masse.
Normalizing credit markets? The Alt-A and prime defaults are just now starting to register...
Purchasing power? You do realize that the Fed funds rate is the rate banks charge other banks, right? Banks are charging risky "prime" home owners well into the 7% range for jumbos- because they can no longer securitize the loans and dump them on the market. They want moolah to keep your mortgage on their books.
I'm sorry, one need only look at the parabolic upswing in any chart of median prices/median incomes to see that either (a) incomes have to double or (b) home prices have to half for mean reversion.
Given the wage pressures of globalization, my money is on (b).
Posted by michael
Wed Dec 12th, 2007 01:10 AM
Corcoran...i would have to completely DISAGREE with your prediction.....i think you guys have had your time and made enough money for a lifetime over the last 10 years in real estate.....enough is enough...prices need to come down in manhattan...
Posted by anon
Wed Dec 12th, 2007 08:22 AM
Why is anybody giving any credibility to a post by "Corcoran"??
Come on, folks. Why even indulge that nonsense?
Posted by Douglas Elliman
Wed Dec 12th, 2007 08:26 AM
Agree with Corcoran. The market is going UP, UP, UP through the ROOF! This has been a banner year for Wall Street firms and bonuses will be big and beefy. The economy is as strong as ever. Buy now or forever be priced out.
Posted by Noah
Wed Dec 12th, 2007 08:57 AM
I have a feeling Douglas Elliman is a bit sarcastic. I too disagree with Corcoran's comment.
There is certainly more pain to come in mortgage land, no doubt, but lets be open to what actions will be taken in 2008 to sooth the pain. I have a feeling the fed has a few surprise moves in store for us in near term (1-3 months).
As for bonuses, I think they will be OK this year, but its how that money is spent, or not spent I worry about. Psychology has changed and no on wants to own a depreciating asset or one that is sideways for a year or two. I dont think as many wall streeters will put their money to work in Manhattan RE as in past few years! I expect sales volume to be lighter than in 2006-2007 for JAN-APRIL in total. Lets see how it plays out.
As for the slowdown, I think it will come later on, as the global economy gets dragged in to this mess and out slowdown. And I expect future wall street bonuses, 2009-2010 to be significantly less than expected! How are these banks, brokerages going to make money now that mortgage derivatives, SIV's, and LBO game is all but over.
Posted by Brenda
Wed Dec 12th, 2007 12:30 PM
I have to wonder how many years of real estate boom can be financed by wall street bonuses. Haven't a good number of those individuals already bought? How many "new" and actively searching bonus receivers would enter the market even with a banner year (this one largely consisting of Goldman people)? And what about the people being laid off?
The number of construction permits is only part of the story. It's what each permit is for that matters (Solow's 5000+ development on First Avenue leaps to mind, as does the Hudson Yards area).
Posted by Corcoran
Sat Dec 15th, 2007 11:36 PM
Hey all you doom and gloomers, what do you say to this?
Manhattan Market Remains Stable
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/realestate/16deal2.html?ref=realestate