The Seller's First Response: Probe Bid

Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on August 30, 2007 at 11.37 AM

A: As I get close to my third year in the Manhattan real estate marketplace, I am learning a great deal about negotiating from the experiences I've been through with many clients. One thing that seems consistent with almost ALL the deals I do, is that the seller's first response to your initial bid is a reliable indicator as to where you might have to go to get a deal done! Originally Posted February, 26, 2007

probe-bet.jpg

Its the most challenging part of my buy-side consulting for clients since I attempt to get the lowest price possible for my buyer, I have to hope the seller agrees to that price range. In the end, buyer clients must understand that it is not my decision whether or not the seller will respond to our low-ball bidding strategy. And it's not my decision how low the seller is willing to go to do a deal with you! If there is one thing I learned after 2 1/2 years it is this:

Every seller is unique and under a personal set of circumstances when selling their home. Just because a building's 1BR's are trading for $900/sft, doesn't mean the seller of the property you are interested in will sell it around that price point! If there is no time pressure to sell or the seller is just testing the market, than bidding $1,000/sft for the property still may not get the desired result.
In fact, a complimentary side effect of this principle is that assuming the seller is really looking to sell their property than there is a price range already pre-determined as to what the seller would like to move the property for. The question that remains is how big is this 'acceptable range' and how quickly the seller wants to move the property; the faster the need to sell the lower the price is likely to be.

Which brings me to this conclusion:

Assuming the seller is not testing the market and is really looking to sell, it will be the FIRST RESPONSE to your initial bid that will give you the best look at the poker hand the seller is holding
I use a poker analogy because of the incredible strategy and observational skill needed to play a good game from beginning to end. A similar scenario could be argued for housing negotiations.

Probe Bet: A bet made primarily to gain information by gauging opponents' reactions, especially a small bet made in pot-limit or no-limit games.

In poker, I like to send out what are called 'probe bets' every once in a while to see if I can gather ANY information at all from my opponents as to the strength of their hand. Even if I am holding a weak hand and planning a bluff strategy, a probe bet can be very useful in either winning the hand right there or saving me from an eventual big loss.

In real estate, the initial bid could be considered a 'probe bid' to see where the seller stands as far as their need to sell. If you get a very quick and aggressive response, well then you know you have a seller who is looking to sell quickly and is taking your bid seriously; giving you a tactical advantage. If you get only a slight response two days after your initial bid, then you know the seller is looking for a certain price range and may not be as willing to sell right now for a lower than expected price. If you get no response, then you know the seller is under no time pressure and might be testing the market; or your bid was simply too far below the seller's intended 'acceptable range'.

In all situations, it was the first response to the initial bid that set the groundwork for what is to come next. Sometimes your strategy will fail, and you have to be prepared for that; especially if you are using a low-ball bidding strategy. Other times you will get a very desirable response and your only decision left is how to play the rest of the game.

It's impossible to set up one formula or theory that applies to all situations, so I leave it up to you and your buyer broker to discover for yourself. However, if you have read all the way down to here and still don't get what I'm saying, maybe this chart can help you visualize the importance of the seller's first response.

APT X IS ASKING $500,000 (say $850/sft) AND IS PRICED RIGHT

Situation 1 - Low Ball: Your initial bid of $425,000 gets no response. Obviously the seller knows the property is priced right and has a tight range of 'acceptable price' that is needed to make a deal happen. In this case I would advise my buyer client that a bid of at least $475,000 or so is needed to get the property. Since the apartment is priced right from the get go, the seller is not interested in buyers who are playing bidding games or not-motivated to proceed to the next step.

Situation 2 - Fair Bid: Your initial bid of $450,000 (10% below ask) gets a response of $485,000. Again, the property is priced right and the seller is telling you that there isn't much more room for negotiations! While your bid of $450,000 is a bit low for a properly priced apartment, the seller acknowledges and respects your bid by providing you with a response. The response of $485,000 tells me that you will need to come up more than the seller will likely come down to get a deal done. I would probably advise my client to bid $470,000 next and expect a response of mid-way from the seller.

Situation 3 - Aggressive Bid: Your initial bid of $475,000 gets a response of $487,500 from the seller; halfway. While you may feel like you didn't leave yourself much room for negotiating and getting the lowest price possible, you did tell the seller that you are a serious buyer and that you understand the property was priced properly from the start. At this point you have 2 choices. Either you stand firm and tell the seller that your initial bid is your most aggressive bid that you are comfortable making with the hopes of them accepting it OR you move to $480,000 to get the deal done. I don't see how a seller who responds to your initial bid of $475,000 with a counter of $487,500 will say NO to your $480,000 2nd bid.

UrbanDigs Says: Use your initial bid as a probe bid to see what the seller's reaction will be. Many times you will be able to get a lot of good information from a solid probe bid that will give you an idea of where you might have to go to get a deal done. In the end, every deal ends up at one price that is suitable for both the buyer and seller. So the question is, are you comfortable with where the seller is looking to move the property at. Since it is no one's decision but the seller's to ultimately make that decision to move at a requested price, the buyer must do all they can to find out the range where that requested price falls into!

Comments (6)

Nicely stated. I do, however, always worry about the Ego Wall when lowballing.

Posted by Chris Lengquist | February 26, 2007 2:51 PM

Hey Chris,

Good to see you here again! Thanks and yes I worry about that too. I lost a few deal in the past month alone due to the low-ball strategy that didnt work. My fault though, with NYC so active now is not the time to be low-balling.

Posted by Noah | February 26, 2007 3:16 PM

Great post! I am gonna share it with my own blog readers at jason.landbrokr.com ! Thanks.

Posted by Jason Ganz | August 30, 2007 11:04 PM

Interested in hearing your thoughts, Noah - what do you mean that "NYC so active now is not the time to be low-balling"? Aren't you seeing any fallout from the subprime loans crisis that is translating to sellers being more willing to consider lowball offers, just to get things sold?

Posted by Sydney | September 3, 2007 9:01 PM

Sydney - The post was originally published FEB 26th, 2007! Its up there at end of the first paragraph, but sometimes people miss it. Thats why older comments are dated in FEB,

But to answer your question, other than psyhcology change, I do not see any major shift in fundamentals yet. I say yet because this market always lags! When you see a correction in stocks and a trickle down to jobs, bonuses, salaries, etc.. then you will see a shift in fundamentals here.

Right now, inventory is too tight to bring any fallout in very near term

Posted by Noah | September 3, 2007 9:19 PM

I think that's a fair analysis. Of course, up until now (and maybe even now), the supply of desirable, right-priced apartments was so tight that if you dither with a probe or low-ball bid, you'll probably end up overbidding to catch up.

I've bought 2 co-op apartments, and both times we just set a ceiling and offered the ask. We got one at ask and the other we bid up 5% (to our ceiling) to get. Both deals were done within 2 weeks of the apts. hitting the market. I don't really see the value in trying to gain an extra 2-3 pct. when the alternative is losing a desirable property.

But that may all change in the next 6 months.

Posted by Bolder | September 4, 2007 9:59 AM

Post a comment


To help maintain the integrity of the conversation we ask that each user simply paste the keyword (below in red) into the confirmation field below. Sorry, but if you forget this step, your comments will not be saved!