Its A Risky New World: Credit Spreads
A: Back to blogging in a very different world. While the news that has come out in the past few weeks at Bear Sterns, American Home Mortgage, Countrywide Financial, etc. is by no means a surprise, they have been the most direct contributors to the current instability in the mortgage markets leading to a re-pricing of risk in the corporate and residential debt markets. As a result of this uncertainty, stock prices have corrected from record highs, especially the financials and homebuilder stocks, and there has been a flight to quality into the bond markets driving down yields as investors seek the safety of treasury returns. However, you may have noticed that lending rates have not dropped that much considering the 10YR yield fell by over 50 basis points in the past 4-5 weeks. The reason why lies in RISK!
Lets get right into this mess! For the past few years I have been explaining the relationship between stock markets and bond prices/yields, inflation, fed moves, currency trends and global growth and how they all relate to the Manhattan real estate marketplace and your investment! I try my best to simplify these macro issues so that you can understand what is going on in the world and why rates go up or down leaving you with either a lower or higher monthly payment on mortgages, credit cards, and other forms of debt. But now, the world is really changing and rather than stick to the old model, we MUST adapt quickly with the markets to understand where we are RIGHT NOW in the hopes of best understanding how any changes might relate to our investment decisions.
In the Old World (2002-2006) - Money was very inexpensive to borrow, especially in the beginning of this range. After Sept. 11th and the dot com stock market crash, the fed did everything possible to pump liquidity into the financial systems via cutting the fed funds rate all the way down to 1%. The effect took a year or so to kick in with stock prices bottoming out in 2003 (in hindsight), and lending rates fell to ultra low historical levels providing homeowners with amazingly low rate offers for home purchases. This pumped up affordability and led to a housing boom involving real buyers, developers, and speculators. Lenders of all types jumped on the bandwagon and offered very creative loan products to prospective buyers as home prices boomed and buyers found asking prices out of their budgets. The exotic loans made the home payments more affordable, albeit for a little while. The fed started raising rates at very small increments (mainly at 0.25% clips, or 25 basis points) all the way up to today’s level of 5.25%. The effect of this rate tightening took some time to kick in again, leading to the new world of higher rates and more expensive debt.
In the New World (mid 2006 - Present) - Subprime woes, bad loans, resetting ARM’s, rising rates, falling home prices, rising defaults, tighter lending standards all started to come to a head. Higher rates started to wake up homeowners to the new reality that monthly payments are significantly higher than they first thought; especially for those with resetting short term ARM products and interest only loan products. Defaults started to rise. The lenders found themselves in a bit of trouble as the repackaging and reselling of mortgage backed securities became more and more difficult as risk started to rise in the mortgage markets. In lay terms, with defaults rising and home prices falling, fewer and fewer investors wanted to buy these mortgage backed securities. Those funds that had to sell were forced to liquidate their holdings at levels far below what they thought they were worth; Bear Stearns funds are a great example of this. Other funds and lenders tried to ride out the wave until they had margin calls due and couldn’t pay up; American Home Mortgage is a great example of this. All in all, there is a re-pricing of risk going on in the tradable markets right now and risk is getting very expensive driving up rates for risky debt. As a result of this, those holding mortgage backed securities and CDO’s are having trouble finding buyers and are forced to liquidate at big time losses. Liquidity is drying up and that is bad for everyone. This is the world we live in. This is the beginning of a credit crunch. Every company with exposure to this is feeling pain.
Credit spreads are widening as a result of all this. In other words, the difference between corporate bond yields and US government treasury yields are increasing as the risk associated with corporate paper rises! Relating this to the mortgage markets, while short and medium term US gov't treasury yields are falling fast due to a flight to quality as stock prices fall, the rates on mortgage products are NOT falling at the same pace! This is because mortgage debt is now MORE RISKY than treasury bond notes and therefore demands a HIGHER RISK PREMIUM to gather investorsl i.e. higher yields. This is causing the spread between the two to widen.
Confused? I'll put a pure definition of credit spreads up here to hopefully clear things up.
Credit Spreads - In finance, a credit spread, or net credit spread, is the difference in yield between different securities due to different credit quality. The difference between the yield on a corporate bond and a government bond is called the credit spread. As such, the credit spread reflects the extra compensation investors receive for bearing credit risk (these last 2 sentences & hypothetical chart example below via Investopedia.com).

I have said for a long time that the 10YR bond is our most reliable short term indicator as to where lending rates are headed in the very near term. Due to the current credit crunch and re-pricing of risk, this NO LONGER APPLIES as a reliable indicator!
Due to the re-pricing of risk, mortgage rates are NOT falling as much as one would think with such a dive in 10YR bond yields over the past 4-5 weeks. As more and more lenders go under and less options become available to homeowners and perspective buyers (stated income loans are starting to go away now), rates are going to be in a generally upwards trend (Wells Fargo recently announced that 30YR rates for jumbo loans are going to be around 8% - I'll write on this topic shortly)! In short, the risk is too high to allow mortgage rates to fall in conjunction with falling bond yields; again, causing the widening of credit spreads.
Starting to get it? If I were a soon to be homeowner, I would keep my eyes glued to what is going on in the credit markets. Its hard to miss! Just watch CNBC for 15-20 minutes at any given time and you should catch at least one economic discussion on the topic. For those interested in more in depth conversations on the topic, tune in to Kudlow & Company on CNBC from 5-6PM daily and I guarantee you will start to learn more about what is going on in regards to the re-pricing of risk currently underway.
It’s a changing world. Either you realize it and adapt with it, or you lose; plain and simple. I believe bond yields will continue to be pressured as long as this credit mess is around with more and more lenders and home builders getting into trouble in the near future. Every time a major lender goes under, tighter lending standards get more real, risk gets more attention, and home loans should demand higher rates and stricter underwriting requirements.
In the end, its healthy for all markets that this is a known problem and that its OUT for the markets to adjust to. It would have been worse if there were cover ups on this delaying the inevitable to a later time; this is yet to be seen. Instead, lets get it all out now or in the very near future and let the tradable markets do what they have to do to absorb the problems so that a longer term sustainable growth pace can reveal itself. In the meantime, we are still trying to find out how deep this rabbit hole is!
Lets See Why This May Ultimately Hit Manhattanites - Stock losses are the most direct threat to the continued sustainability of the New York City real estate marketplace. If stocks flounder, it could start a chain reaction of events that includes job losses, contraction in bonuses, lower salaries, weaker buyer demand, and forced resales of already purchased properties that were bought by unsuspecting high earners hurt by job loss or salary/bonus cutback. It could also put some fear into non wall street homeowners who will choose to sell and pocket profits made over the past years. The current inventory tightness could reverse as a result providing more competition amongst sellers during a time with weaker buyer demand and higher interest rates on loans. All of this has not yet occurred and is only a potential outcome should stock losses really hit the market. I will not comment on the likelihood of this happening due to the uncertainty in the credit markets and what may be done about it.


Comments (11)
Great analysis Noah. So what do think can get us out of this mess? How long do you think it will take for the markets to absorb, as you say, the credit problems?
Posted by jesse | August 4, 2007 5:18 PM
Jesse - I have a post covering that topic that will go up on Monday. Want to leave this one up for few days as a prelude to it.
Honestly, I think companies exposed to this need to come clean, take book value of their bad bets, write off the losses, and let the markets re-price their equity values given future re-organizationa of the company. I fear that many companies are trying to ride this thing out and will come out at a later time that it didnt work. That wont help us.
Posted by Noah | August 4, 2007 5:26 PM
For Jessie,
Nothing! Problems are much deeper than anyone wants to believe right now and the next year or so will bring negative suprises to alot of stock holders hoping that the credit crunch will just go away
BRING EM DOWN BABY!!
Posted by ira | August 4, 2007 6:12 PM
Noah, your site is great but fix your comment section so that you dont have to approve each comment. Put a challenge question or something if spam is why you are not leaving forum open.
I think youll get many more comments.
Posted by fix comments | August 4, 2007 6:25 PM
your 100% right #4! Next week I'll look into getting that fixed...I hate the way it is now. Thanks!
Posted by Noah | August 4, 2007 6:26 PM
Noah, it is great that you now call the shift in the trends in the NY real estate market. You even put the start of the shift at mid-2006. Looking back to mid-2006, it was difficult to guess from blogs then that the market has shifted.
The more relevant questions for many of us who are in this blog is whether or not it is good to buy at this time? Should we just rent and wait? For how long?
Posted by Anonymous | August 5, 2007 11:30 AM
Anon - Its such a hard question to answer!
Given the inventory tightness in sales market and the low vacancy rate in rental world, I think the buy decision should be made after analyzing your own personal situation, rather than trying to time the market. You should look at:
1. Personal Job/Salary
2. Personal Liquid Assets
3. Timeline To Own at least 4+ years
4. Finding A Home That Meets Your Budget/needs
If you pass all of these, than make the decision to buy without worrying about timing. If you have a great rental rate, than renew if your too worried. But if your like me and facing very high rental costs and higher hikes, then buying becomes a must alternative to consider.
Still too early to predict a serious downturn in Manhattan given tight inventory, healthy jobs, high salaries, buyer demand, and rental vacancy rates
Posted by Noah | August 5, 2007 11:44 AM
You know I just want to say something..I think this upcoming week is fairly important. We'll see whether the stock markets bounce from the last few weeks correction, we'll see what the fed does in regards to credit problems, and initial jobless claims on the 9th.
Most important is this credit issue. We need to see how the markets adapt to these problems. I hope the credit crunch of 2007 doesnt become a notable phrase for future investors to look back on.
Posted by Noah | August 5, 2007 5:21 PM
The upcoming week is going to show that homeowners are in over their head already. Foreclousres will double in the next 6 months and if the fed cuts interest rates then inflation will be out of hand. China's growth will cause our inflation to continue if the Fed cuts rates. I sorry that all these people on wall street are losing their jobs but they should have thought about that before they came up with the CDO's that made them that much money. I think it absolutely pathetic that the people on wall street are more worried about their jobs than millions of americans that are going to lose their homes due to the products and demands that they put out. The sad part is if these "Wallstreet" people had priced in the risk they would not be where they are today. Why is does the average american have to pay the price for their mistakes. This will be one of the biggest financial crisis that this country has ever seen.
Posted by jennifer | August 5, 2007 7:32 PM
Dear Noah,
We are looking to purcahse a rental property in Manhattan not more than $600K. We intend to put down 25% and finance the rest. We also intend to rent out the unit immedaitely. After much researches, $600K can buy us a nice lux studio in good locations or it can buy us a slightly below average 1 bedroom in 'ok' neighborhoods.
After studying closely the rental market (by looking at asking prices for comparable properties on Craigs List), we have come to a conclusion that, what we can afford to buy can command a rental income of only $2000 to $2500 a month.
This is what our calculation comes to:
Cost of property: $600K, $150K (25%) down payment.
Finance: $450K
Interest: 5.75%
Terms: 30 years
Monthly Mortgage = $ 2,626.08 a month
Maintenance = Approximately $900/month
Total monthly payment = $3,526.00
$2000/$2300/month rental income hardly covers the mortgage and maintenance of the unit. Based on this calculation, how can Manhattan properties be a good investment if ones does not intend to live there?
I am not sure if my method of calculation is correct. Do I divide the yearly rental income with the entire cost of the property? That's $2300/month x 12 months.....$27,600/$600,000 x 100% = 4.6% yield.
What about the $900/month maintenance that wasn't even accounted for in my calculations?
Thank you very much for your time and hope you can help!
Posted by Eager To Buy | March 15, 2008 4:08 PM
I always try to leave a comment. Sometimes I might go to a blog and it's all advertising and a product I'm not interested in, so I don't say anything, but otherwise I try to leave a comment. If you don't leave comments, how are you ever going to meet people? On my other blog, I've made some wonderful friends because of visits and commenting.
Posted by Tax Liens | June 30, 2008 4:53 AM