Why Harlem is Hot Hot Hot
Nope its not just the real feel temps of 105 degrees being felt citywide. Harlem is on fire from a development perspective and I'm going to try to show you why and why I think it will continue in the next couple of pages. Check out where new development has gone up or is going up on this Google map I made (yes this is what I do all day):
MAP OF HARLEM PROPOSED CONDOMINIUMS
For those of you aficionados who say - Dah! We already know...I hope you invested in the late 90s, because here are the stats:

* Washington Post
Despite this significant boom in Harlem, I think the best is yet to come. Away from those in the know, there are many who don't realize the huge changes that have happened in Harlem and what is to come, but lets back up for a minute.
Why did this happen?
Numbers Shmumbers you say...Why did it really happen?
Non-profits and social services organizations role in the Harlem Renaissance is undeniable - although their major contribution to it was in part through a surreptitious avenue - they moved uptown. Former President Bill Clinton's 2001 move to offices at 55 West 125th Street was the spark that started the fire. Non-profits and social services organizations quickly clustered around Clinton's offices absorbing much of the neighborhoods 3.4MM square feet of commercial space and quickly driving a doubling of rents to $35 per square foot range in 2004. The second Harlem Renaissance was also at least in part sparked by the Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone (UMEZ), which began in 1994 and has financed 152 initiatives with $134MM in and leveraged $695MM in total investment. The UMEZ allocated 27% of its funds to tourism and cultural industrial development, 58% to business investment, and 15% to workforce and human capital development.Snore! Why are people really moving there?
Tons of commercial developments over the last decade are making Harlem a better place to live. (The following are merely highlights)
So what's to look forward too?
Columbia University - The University has a proposed $7 Billion expansion on 17 acres in West Harlem designed by Renzo Piano and Skidmore Owings and Merrill.
East River Plaza - This game changing project will be a 500,000 square foot retail center development, which is a JV between Blumenfeld Development Corporation and Forest City Rattner. The center, on 6 acres stretching from 116th Street to 119th Street along the FDR Drive will include Home Depot, and Target as anchor tenants when it opens in 2008.
Harlem Park - Bringing Class A office space to Harlem, Vornado will deliver a 640,000 square foot 21 story mixed use building at 125th & Park by. The building will reside adjacent to the 125th Street stop on the Metro North commuter rail. The project is already 11% leased with a planned completion in 2009.
Harlem Piers Re-development - This is an $18.7MM publicly financed project to build two piers on the Hudson River between St. Clair Place and West 135th Street. The first will be used for excursion boats and water taxis with the second to be reserved for recreation including sunbathing and fishing. The connection to pedestrian and bicycle paths will fill a missing link in the planned coastal greenway on the Hudson River side of the city.
Harlem Hospital Center - The Harlem Hospital is in the second year of its five-year modernization plan. The $249 million five-year modernization plan includes demolishing antiquated buildings, renovating 183,000 square feet, and building a 150,000 square foot Patient Pavilion. Plans include a new Emergency Department, state-of-the-art critical care and diagnostic units, and new, fully equipped operating rooms.
Museum for African Art - The Museum for African Art will have a 90,000 square foot, $80MM new home designed by Yale’s Dr. Robert A.M. Stern. It is being called a cultural gateway to Harlem. It is set to open in 2009 at its new permanent location, 5th Avenue and 110th Street. It is the first new museum to be built on "Museum Mile" since the Guggenheim in 1959.
Avalon Morningside Park - Avalon's 20 Story 296 units rental apartment building at Morningside Drive and Cathedral Parkway is one of the largest new residential developments in Harlem. Importantly, Avalon is a trend setting public REIT, who has blazed trails in the Lower East Side Noho and Long Island City already.
How has all this impacted the residential real estate market?
If I have overwhelmed you with data, good. The point is the Harlem Renaissance is for real, its here to stay and things will only get better from here. While in a downturn Harlem like other "growth" areas could get hit hard. But you can bet I'm one investor who will be a buyer on any dip. Go check it out for yourself, but wait for the heat wave to end.



Posted by Noah
Wed Jul 11th, 2007 08:43 AM
Fantastic post Jeff! I knew of some of these projects planned but didn't know all of them nor the details that you provided here on each. Very thorough and great analysis.
Recall that Jeff Bernstein joined the UrbanDigs writing team a few months ago. We both went to Union College and now Jeff is a partner at Guild Partners; a residential investment and development company. Needless to say we hit it off immediately and Im ecstatic to have his perspective on the blog for you guys to read.
Posted by uwsider
Wed Jul 11th, 2007 10:36 AM
Could someone post a more balanced view of Harlem? I would like opinions from the point of view.
Posted by Noah
Wed Jul 11th, 2007 10:57 AM
uwsider - W Harlem is perceived as far safer and more desireable than E Harlem! Cant argue that.
E Harlem seems to be getting alot of planned dev with that E River Plaza and 2nd ave subway coming in. But it will take many many years to change the reputation of this area, especially from 96th - 125th streets!
Common responses by buyers when I discuss E harlem are:
does the apt come with bullet proof windows?
is a gun included in the sale?
etc..Jokingly, but nevertheless, thats the rep this area has. In another 7-10 years who knows..10 years ago it was stay below 86th..now its stay below 96th. In 10 years it may be stay below 106th.
Posted by uwsider
Wed Jul 11th, 2007 03:00 PM
Interestingly enough, if the proposed conjestion plan goes through it may go back to "stay below 86th" ... will be interesting to see what "may" happen above 86th
Posted by anonymous
Thu Jul 12th, 2007 02:17 PM
I've posted about lower Washington Heights and the northern sections of Harlem several times and on several blogs. Every time I'm shocked by the pitch of the insults that get posted back. Many are of the "is a gun included in the sale" variety. But most are just horribly racist and many complaints could be applied to any part of the city: the "it's noisy and dirty" accusation to be specific. The only thing I can think is that people who purchased "below 86th" (who are not hedge fund managers and the like who can ride out property values moving sideways or down) are 100% invested in not seeing other areas appreciate.
To answer the call for a balanced view of Harlem, I’ll give you my take. I own rental properties in Harlem and reside in Washington Heights – where I also have rentals. My purchases all have taken place in the last 6 years. All have appreciated. My sense is that appreciation will slow for a bit but that due to the sheer size of the apartments and the little work required to restore them to their “classic 6” glory, that the overall (within the next 5 years) appreciation will be impressive. My rentals are filled by physicians working at Columbia Pres. and their families or Columbia graduate students. So, good tenants are not an issue if you're looking for investment reasons.
The area is no more dangerous than, say, the west end of Christopher Street. Incidentally, the only place where I have ever been robbed. For those of you old, enough think East Village about 15 years ago. Should you be mindful, yes. Afraid, no. The Heights feels (FEELS, not IS) safer than East Harlem and West Harlem feels only slightly safer than the Heights – mainly due to restaurants and bars and general activity. The services in Harlem get better by the day. Washington Heights has to catch up in this are, no question. (Except by the Columbia Pres. where there are decent places) However, I see this as just another opportunity space.
Overall, if you’re very wealthy I say buy wherever you want. If you’re not and you want an apartment that will be affordable and can accommodate any changes in your life – job loss, children and so on because you’re not over-leveraged or living in a closet - I say go north.
Posted by alice
Thu Jul 12th, 2007 02:29 PM
How do we access the map? It looks like it is password protected.
Posted by cd
Thu Jul 12th, 2007 02:34 PM
regarding the population growth, what percentage of sales are going to Hispanics?
Posted by Mark the Shark
Thu Jul 12th, 2007 02:41 PM
To add to all this is the developments on Central Park North and Upper 5th Avenue, which have all sold at incredible prices unfathomable north of 96th Street.
Harlem now has what is considered to be a "luxury submarket" in this Central Park rim north of 96th Street up to 116th Street and the Kalahari.
Posted by Noah
Thu Jul 12th, 2007 02:54 PM
map link is working fine for me?
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8%26hl=en%26msa=0%26msid=111392867151867447516.00000112e70fc08a9dbd2%26z=12%26om=1
Posted by anonymous
Thu Jul 12th, 2007 04:08 PM
Prices for brownstone shells have declined since 2005, with most now going for under 1M again. Renovated brownstones would be a more interesting figure, but the market is not large and there's not much data.
Posted by anon
Thu Jul 12th, 2007 04:16 PM
I can't access the map either. need user/pass
Posted by butch
Fri Jul 13th, 2007 05:35 AM
Dear Noah,
sigh..groan, i really look forward to reading your stuff
but, but i am so tired of middle aged white men making "jokes" about crime, viloence in Harlem, "does it come with bullet proof window?"
i'm not a troll and thats why i'm even taking these few minutes writing you, whatever.
in any case, would Harlem be such an investment and "good deal" if it hadn't suffered for decades? and can you really justify yourself when you "joke" about what plagues some minority communities? remember most of the drug buyers are coming into the city from the "burbs" or "downtown" i.e. white professionals looking for whatever ..
i'm sick of reading the same stereotypical harlem this, harlem that, plenty of crime in west village and tribeca, it just does not make it into the "news and blogosphere" because well it ruin people conceptions.
whatever,. goodluck to you and if ever, ever happen to find yourself uptown send me an email, glad to buy you a coffee,
and if by some unfortunate circumstance you get mugged downtown, well those are the breaks
Posted by NelsonBenson
Fri Jul 13th, 2007 08:54 AM
In the long term we are all dead. People develope in Harlem because it has so many run down properties. And the land is relatively affordable. And while there are enough fools to may a couple of millions for a townhouse there as opposed to a nice apartment on the upper east side (well-managed by the so-called tough boards) Harlem is still Harlem and it will never be what Manhattan is. It will be a Brooklyn without a bridge and without trees. Eventually, we will run out of succkers
Posted by Noah
Fri Jul 13th, 2007 09:11 AM
Butch - Those statements I said in my comments are what I HEAR FROM PROSPECTIVE BUYERS and then passing on to you as what I hear on the street when Im working...thats what this site is about. It is NOT my opinion of the area and actually, I feel perfectly safe and comfortable in both E & W Harlem. I go there at least 4-5 times a week.
My point was that the reputation on the street of E Harlem is not the best, and something like that takes a lot of time to change; that is, public opinion.
I think E Harlem is a very safe investment moving forward if price is right and not asking a full premium for develeopment plans 5-7 years from now.
I hope you look back at that comment and understand the context in how I said it.
Posted by Ludo
Fri Jul 13th, 2007 10:27 AM
I moved to Hamilton Heights 6 months ago after living in the W. Village for 3 yrs.
The best decision in my life so far ! ;-)
Tree-lined block, amazing architecture/townhouses, I know more than 15 of my block neighbours already and been invited to many of them (I barely knew 1 of my neighbour in my W. village building in 3 yrs).
As for the life there, true, it lacks amenities (restaurants of quality/expensive, bars...), but i feel as safe as anywhere in manhattan (not even talking about a better neighbourhood watch because we know each other) and yes I can see it developping.
So in brief, if you are not that openminded or are risk-averse, yes, Uptown is certainly not from you.
For the rest of you, you should definitely check it out one weekend...
PS to Butch: I hope that Harlem retains a bit of its current feeling, that is its charm, but with all the new luxury developements and the columbia extension, I'm afraid you'll be wrong. At least current owners won't complain!...
Posted by jeff
Fri Jul 13th, 2007 10:49 AM
I'm glad there has been some discussion sparked by my piece. I am a believer in the Harlem Renaissance. I'm a believer that there will be value created for buyers. But I in no way meant to claim that Harlem will outperform all other areas, the way it has since its huge rebound from a deep depression. Way too many variables to make that kind of prediction of any New York market. But I think the trend is good. The thorniest issue for Harlem is the lack of benefit that lower income residents have seen from the renaissance so far and the fact that escalating rents are squeezing lower income people out. While some squeezing out is inevitable when an area gentrifies, it dosn't have to be wholesale. My best idea for Harlem is for the NYCHA, which is in dire financial straights to begin with, to look at the idea that has been floated by others of paying some current tenants of some of the projects for their "leasehold interests" in the buildings - a pay day most I think would be very happy with. Turn some central space over to developers/non-profit partnerships for "urbanist" mixed use developments including affordable and middle income housing, townhouses, apratments etc., plus retail, entertainment and the like. Doing this would clear some middle space for those who can make it out of NYCHA facilities due to the new jobs being created to settle into more hopeful living situations, while bringing in services and jobs. The current "islands of despair" which are the NYCHA projects need to be addressed.
Posted by Sena
Fri Jul 13th, 2007 03:19 PM
Harlem Renaissance- yes- but INCLUDE the peoples who made Harlem famous!
I came to NYC because of the artists and musicians- not because of wall street. If Harlem becomes "condo ghetto" like Manhattan and Brooklyn then its over! If Artists cannot afford the rents any more then NYC is dead...and Manhattan is already un-affordable for us unless we make a ton of money. I saw many of these new developments from the inside and I must say that they are nearly all built by copy cats. Architects follow trends and not visions. We - the Artists- we want RAW spaces- we want to design our own spaces- but you drive us out ...we THE ARTISTS will never want to live in your sterile buildings in an all white neighborhood...good lord- how boring!
WE the ARTISTS - we want to live with the every day people and listen to their thoughts- we do not want to live in condos that all look the same ...WE - the ARTISTS- WE make this city exciting- we live with ALL people- we are not scared to be robbed because the people in the streets LOVE us...
let me give you one example- it is a scandalous new development ... and you are part of it!
Markus Garvey Park has drum sessions since 40 years - every week end- they have permission from the city to drum until 9Pm- ( which is a joke anyways) - drum and dance is for the people- but now with all these new condos and all these stiff white folks moving in - yeah- they called the police at 7:30 pm because the drums are too loud and the police tries to shut down a peaceful community and the white folks- only 4 people! - watched from their condo windows to see if they can kill the joy of a whole community.... THAT IS WHAT IS GOING ON- and let me tell you - these arrogant white folks will not be allowed to destroy the peoples that made me come here. Once again- I did not come here for 'Luxury Condos" and I did not come for Wall Street Bonds- I CAME BECAUSE OF THE PEOPLE- the melting pot- and believe me- very few white folks inspired me...
So- if you want to make this city a ghetto for the rich- right on- one day you will understand that when you have driven out the last NEGRO or LATINO or whoever is next on your list - you will see that NYC is becoming BORING- because you are unable to add SOUL to it.
One day you will sit in your look-alike condos thinking the same and wearing the same and buying the same overpriced crap and nothing will move any more- because we- the people - your mirror- we will be gone and once we are pushed out you will have a sterile world ... and watch excitement only in movies...you will see- and we- THE ARTISTS- we will move with the people - not with you ... you as developers and investors think you can play "EMPEROR" - only because you have a little money - but you did not understsand that the best emperor and the most successful emperoro is the one wh LISTENS to the people ... you will wake up one day and realize that YOU need us...as well as we would need you to make this world a better place...TOGETHER ...
It is time that you white folks get some good advice from real artists and visionaries-
the new architecture that you put up is an eye sore - as well as your thinking is a disgrace.
It is time that you re-think your concepts-
get together with real designers who design for the people so that we all lead a happier and healthier life.
The only profit that is worth it is the success that benefits ALL people.
And it would be very easy to do so.
But you need Vision, STYLE, and Knowledge.
You need skilled people to design a healthy neighborhood and you need to be humble and listen.
One day you will understand
All the Best - and -
develop from the inside out! :-)
greetings
Sena
Posted by Charles Walker, Director of Communications, UMEZ
Fri Jul 13th, 2007 04:32 PM
Thank you for mentioning the Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone Development Corp. (UMEZ) in your highly informative article. There are some additional salient facts, however, I believe should be known. In terms of the East River Plaza project, UMEZ has invested $55 million toward its development. Additionally, we awarded the Museum of African Art a $500,000 grant for pre-development costs for a major capital improvement project. Finally, we are financing over $6 million towards the development of the Harlem Piers project. Once again, thank you.
Posted by THE HARLEM OBSERVER
Sat Jul 14th, 2007 03:07 AM
With the development of Harlem you have ushered in the destruction,of Harlem's culture and character, as well as its people. Now the main drug users in the city(whites) can walk from their condos a short distance to score. Already you guys are renaming parks and streets to ease the uncomfortability of whites saying "Malcolm x Boulevard' and "Marcus Garvey Park". the police,developers and realators continue to lie to the "new settlers" in Harlem about its safety. The frequent rapes and muggings of whites in harlem this year will never make the news so not to prevent future investors. With unemployment over 50% for black males in NYand higher in Harlem, there will be new iphones to be had shortly on the street. Your history of destroying places, cultures and people wherever you go has not stopped. Try to just move somewhere without fucking it up for once. Thank god for the projects-the last defense of Harlem.
Posted by Noah
Sat Jul 14th, 2007 07:30 AM
Sena & Harlem observer - Im not ruining anything! Stop using white stereotypes and rather continue doing your proactive communities to protect your sacred culture and past.
Im all for development that does not change the essence of the neighborhood, the people, and the history that made it what it is today. Threatening with theft and violence is a very weak way to achieve your goal.
My colleague Jeff only reported on what is going on in Harlem, thats it. He is not part of any developers involved nor does he have any say of such projects. Its just reporting. So reach out to who it matters to and Ill be on your side.
Posted by Eliz
Tue Jul 17th, 2007 12:23 PM
"Harlem is still Harlem and it will never be what Manhattan is.."
Uh--NelsonBenson..I am not a pro or con Harlem but that was a REALLY stupid comment since Harlem IS in Manhattan. And I think even a "succker" would take a whole townhome in Harlem over 500 sq. ft on the UES.
But, since I live downtown I guess I am not the most informed.
Posted by Dave
Tue Jul 17th, 2007 04:22 PM
Hmm Sena, aren't there any white artists in New York? Free you're own mind while you're up on the apple box preaching.
As for Harlem Observer, spare me the grief. My black neighbors (who, curiously enough, show little interest in my iphone) are getting tired of telling me to please call it "Mt. Morris Park" as their families have been calling it for years. Grow up.
Posted by ellen
Tue Jul 17th, 2007 05:18 PM
I think this is totally amazing. We just moved to THE LENOX and it could be the best investment we ever made. We left Sutton Place for this and its just so alive up here and so friendly. A true neighborhood feel right in Manhattan. Our bldg has alot of retail space in it and now a VERY high end car dealership is coming too, it will house ROllsRoyces and better. Also we need a Tastee D lite on Lenox. I have a newnewyorker.com site and I am starting a new comers club too so all this is THE BEST. Our bldg is planning to have a block party for the whole neighborhood. I also thot Nordstrom's should open up here so they can get tax break and also all the people from Manhattan that run to Westchester and Jersy to shop there would now only have to come to 125th Street.
Its just so exciting to be a part of something growing and wonderful!
Posted by NYC Resident
Tue Jul 17th, 2007 05:23 PM
Please do not be discouraged by the ignorant and racist comments on this blog. When Harlem fell into disrepair and chaos it was due to racist policies and the attack on "black culture." Now that some revitalization is taking hold in these slums, these same ignoramuses are saying it is a racist policy and an assault on "black culture." You cannot win so disregard the fools and continue to invest in these communities.
However, Harlem Observer is correct when they say that "the projects are the last defense for black people." The projects are, in fact, the last forbidding places left in the city, with the ghetto culture firmly entrenched, infecting everything in these hell holes. Unless these havens for drugs, violence, extreme poverty, and ghetto culture are addressed, there is no true hope for Harlem, or any other of these communities plagued by projects. I suspect these dumping grounds for society’s misfits and malcontents will soon be “reorganized” to promote stable and healthy communities.
And as for Sena's comments regarding artists and the creation of "ghetto's for the rich," one could only laugh at such a foolish and naïve statement. Let it be known that I am a native New Yorker, and although it may be cute to be an artist (from somewhere else) and move to an area like Harlem "to be around the locals," as a native NYer, there is nothing cute, fun, sexy, wonderful, or worthy of saving, cherishing, glorifying, or emulating in these chaotic, desperate, dysfunctional, sick, and dangerous areas.
The 3 generation welfare abusers, the drug addicts that attempt to sell their children for a hit, the robberies, murders, the garbage all over the streets, the dilapidated buildings....it all makes for a wonderful experience for artists, but not so for the residents of these communities. These communities and people are not exhibits for you to study, paint, or learn about your inner child because you grew up in a whitewashed suburb. Investment is sorely needed in these communities, and anyone that prevents the investment in services, amenities, housing, transportation, business, and infrastructure, is no friend of this city, and certainly no friend of these communities in desperate need. You are not from these communities, you do not speak for me or those in these communities, so please do not attempt to do so.
Furthermore, there was a great history of Harlem long before blacks became residents en masse, so there is merely a RECLAIMING of a once great neighborhood. Just because a neighborhood becomes black, or any other race, does not make it the end of history. Neighborhoods in the city have an ebb and flow of demographics, and those policies (and people) that try to artificially stifle these changes are those that promote isolation, segregation, and ghettofication (ex: Harlem).
Unfortunately, there will always be those who feel they are entitled to one thing or another, but choosing where you want to live, at the price you want to pay, in this city, is not a right or bestowed upon you at birth, With the revitalization occurring in these communities, rents will go up, some people will be displaced, but anyone who believes that these positive changes and investments are bad for these desperate communities is a traitor to these communities in need, and selfishly wanting to maintain cheap rent for themselves at any cost, including the lives of it’s current and future residents.
Posted by harlemnative
Thu Jul 19th, 2007 11:40 PM
to the poster above me, are you from harlem? Did you ever live in harlem? You being a native new yhorker means absolutely nothing in terms of harlem especially, because native WHITE new yorkers are the main ones that have placed a stigma on our community for decades. Now the greedy locust investors aim to erase this community entirely. At this point I could care less, the disrespect that this city has shown its black residents and continues to do so show that this is not the place for us, which is why so many people are moving away. You can have your bland monotenous NYC, soon it will be no different than Minnesota.
Posted by NYC Resident
Fri Jul 20th, 2007 10:43 AM
Harlem Native:
1-It is a shame that you focus so much on race instead of the obvious problems within our communities. Does it really matter whether my statements come from a person of color or a white person? The reality does not change: these communities have lacked investment, resources, true leadership, and basic human values for the better part of 25 years. Instead of continuing the race baiting and blame game (which thus far has not helped anyone), why not become actively involved in these black communities that you purportedly care so much about? That way you can help funnel the much needed investment into projects that will benefit all in the community, including you! It may be easier to sit back and blame, argue, and scream racism, but this will get you nowhere. You can be part of the revitalization of these communities, or you can move away, become even more bitter, more racist, and more depressed.
Note: With this attitude, it really doesn't matter where anyone moves, because they will project these negative views and stereotypes wherever they go. You cannot "move away" from your negativity and loathing for all things white.
2-The stigma on these communities is well earned, as the relentless and entrenched ghetto culture of thuggery, ignorance, and violence is worn as a badge of honor and promoted as a viable lifestyle. This will not change unless mainstream society (yes that includes "bland monotonous" Minnesota) is reintroduced into these dysfunctional communities. I would much rather be able to safely walk down a clean street, be cordial and courteous to my neighbors, and enjoy all that this city has to offer, than maintain the city as it once was: a city overwhelmed by extreme poverty, ghetto culture, violence, filth, animalistic behavior, and desperation. That is the reality that you are promoting by fighting what you foolishly call "gentrification." Become a part of the solution, and stop whining about white people. In case you have not noticed, it has not been helping us!
And for the record I am a NYer of Puerto Rican descent from Mott Haven (aka South Bronx); arguably the worst slum in the city and one of the most notorious in the country. As a human being (and a person of color), I have a vested interest in the revitalization of all these desperate communities, including Mott Haven, Harlem, Bed-Stuy, East-New York, and Spanish Harlem.
Posted by Yojimbot
Sat Dec 13th, 2008 09:30 PM
I love Harlem, but its not for everyone.
Posted by Mbt
Thu Jun 3rd, 2010 01:39 AM
I think another reason fees are not being paid and free months not offered is that prices have come down. Apartments are moving but part of the reason is that prices came down to a point at which they will move.
Posted by uggs nederland
Wed Aug 25th, 2010 03:35 AM
uggs nederland is known as the best sheepskin boots for both fashionable look and ultimate comfort.Apparently, the fashionable colors for uggs kopen are changing but have some succession.
Posted by asics shoes
Sat Oct 9th, 2010 02:56 AM
•Driven by re-development and rent increases, Harlem real estate price appreciation far outpaced that of NY City, with a 300% increase in the 90s, vs. 12% in New York City overall.
Posted by mbt sale
Sat Oct 9th, 2010 02:57 AM
•The median value of all owner occupied housing in Harlem rose 295% from 1995 to 2000 vs. 12% for New York City as a whole.
Posted by ugg australia
Sat Oct 9th, 2010 02:57 AM
•The average price for a brownstone shell hit $1.1MM in 2005 four years after prices of $400k were considered high. The median sales price of co-ops and condos jumped from $60,000 in 1995 to $309,000 in 2005.*
Posted by coach purses
Sat Oct 9th, 2010 02:58 AM
•According to a late 2006 report by the Real Estate Board of New York, the range of retail rents on 125th Street from river to river is ranging from $35 to $177, with the average rent at $94 and the medium at $85 a square foot.
Posted by Beyonce
Tue Jun 7th, 2011 05:35 AM
You have shed a ray of sunsihne into the forum. Thanks!
Posted by qyaztx
Tue Jun 7th, 2011 01:04 PM
oDHwkl smqwfrliqmgp