The Starter/Investment Property

Posted by Noah Rosenblatt on July 18, 2007 at 9.23 AM

A: I would define a 'Starter/Investment Property' as a type of investment strategy that would look something like this: BUY ---> REPLENISH ACCOUNTS ---> RENT OUT ---> BUY BIGGER & REPEAT ---> SELL DURING NEXT FRENZY. Originally Published January 31st, 2007.

The goal of this investment strategy will be to start small, keep your credit perfect, buy bigger, and eventually own a few rental properties that would be constant source of monthly revenue while at the same time having the tenants build your wealth for you. Then wait patiently for a good selling opportunity!

investment-property.jpg

To do this properly means sacrifice and discipline to buy a property that you wouldn't necessarily would want to live permanently in, but is in a location prime for rental income (i.e. near bars/restaurants/parks/subways); as tenants will pay more money to be closer to these city amenities.

FIND THE PROPERTY

This is the tough part. When looking for a starter/investment property you must focus on keeping the monthly payments as close to $1.00/sq. ft. as possible; if its under $1/sq.ft. then be careful the asking price was not raised to compensate). Try to do this without sacrificing the proximity to the above mentioned city amenities!

With a rental property some property features pay more than others. For example, an alcove studio on a prime street in a W. Village walk up might ask the same monthly rent as a small 1BR in a luxury hi/rise in the Upper East! So, location NOT luxuriousness of building is what pays off here.

Try your best to pay for location, light/views, and raw space before shelling out your $$$ for renovations, roof decks, and doormen!

BUY IT

Devise a bid strategy and take into account a possible seller reaction. Play a game in your head to see where the negotiating might go and plan accordingly based on what your target price is. Don't be afraid to low ball; just don't expect a good response if you bid 25% below asking! DO NOT STRETCH YOURSELF ON THIS FIRST PURCHASE! Remember that the goal here is to eventually buy another property and rent this one out!

Get your price and sign that contract (read my post, "My Offer Was Accepted! Now What?")!

RECOVER FINANCIALLY

After flopping down X amount for your down payment plus X amount for transaction closing costs you may feel a little depleted. Not to worry! You are on the right path to building wealth using the tax advantages of homeownership as a historical guide!

Take the next 1-2 years to recover financially and replenish your liquid assets! Don't start spending your money on vacations and unnecessary goods just yet, as the job is not done. Your goal RIGHT NOW should be to save up enough money to buy your next, bigger property!

If it takes you 5 years to get back to where you were before, than so be it! The apartment you just bought is not meant to be sold right away; rather the ideal situation will be to rent out the unit for monthly revenue until the next selling opportunity!

BUY BIGGER & REPEAT

After a few years have passed and your liquid assets after taxes have built up again, it's probably time to start considering buying a bigger apartment and rent out the initial starter investment property. Be sure to learn the products in your target market so that you can bid accordingly.

SELL DURING THE NEXT FRENZY

The entire goal of this strategy is to build wealth for yourself by adding rental properties to your portfolio; hopefully in addition to a new bigger property that you now own and live in. If you have succeeded in doing this in a 5 year period, than you are in great shape so far.

The last step of the puzzle is to WAIT for the next buyer frenzy to hit NYC where you will look to sell 1 or all of your properties and take profits. Uncle Sam offers you 2 tax advantages when you sell so that you can get out of paying Capital gains taxes on the profits from the sale.

TAX BENEFITS:

1. 1031 Exchange: Allows a tax payer to defer the paying of taxes on a gain when an investment property is SOLD & a new property of like or greater value is PURCHASED. In other words, if you first purchased a property for $400K, and then 1 year later sold it for $500K, you can then defer the payment of taxes on the $100K Capital gain in this transaction, as long as you purchase another property worth $500K or more.

2. Primary Residence Tax Benefits: If you have lived in your property, as your primary residence, for at least 2 out of a period of the last 5 years, you will not have to pay Capital gains taxes on the profit when you sell. This benefit equals up to $250K of tax-free gains for singles, and up to $500K of tax free gains for married couples. Of course, this is dependent on how you filed your last tax return; single or married.

Finally, here are some apartments/buildings you should keep an eye on if this strategy meets your investment needs:

1. 151 East 20th Street (Gramercy Park) - 5 floor prewar elevator building in Gramercy Park. Pied-a-terres and sublets allowed without board approval, as noted in central systems. Desirable location where good products are very hard to find. Should get good rental income.

2. 110 Thompson Street (SoHo) - 6th floor walkup building between Spring & Prince Streets allows pied-a-terre's and sublets; however exact sublet policy is unknown. This designer studio is in a great location and is in renting condition as is. Although its a hike up, this one probably wont last long.

Comments (15)

The Buy & Live strategy is a great way for people to get started...especially young people. A few years ago I started a recent college graduate out on this strategy. 3 1/2 years later and he now owns two single family homes and a duplex. All from a modest initial investment. (Obviously our real estate is a little different and less expensive than yours.)

Sounds like you are the man to talk to in NYC. Keep up the good work.

Posted by Chris Lengquist | January 31, 2007 9:58 AM

Thanks for stopping by Chris & Agreed, its a great way to build wealth and after 5-7 years you would be amazed at how many property's your income could afford you to keep in your portfolio.

Thanks! I'll do my best. Hope to see you around here more often. Added you to blogroll, and you keep up the good work too!

Posted by Noah | January 31, 2007 10:14 AM

Interesting post, but I would have to say that limiting the initial outlay to around $600-700 per square foot would be needed to make the rental cash flow neutral. Isn't the high cost of land and construction causing developers build to condos, or combination projects, as opposed to pure rentals? Developers would be building rentals if they could do so at todays prices, but they can't get the numbers to work.

Posted by UWSider | January 31, 2007 4:16 PM

Great article, Noah. I just added this to my del.icio.us links so that it will post to my blog later on and noted that the same strategy could certainly be used in SF as well.

You always seem to find some fairly good deals around Manhattan - well at least they seem like it to someone that doesn't know the market all that well.

Posted by Andrew Maury | January 31, 2007 7:21 PM

Thx Andrew...good to see you around. More deals are starting to pop up but buyers snap them up relatively quick.

UWSider - I agree, however, if you buy now and in 1-2 years get 85% or higher of your pre-tax carrying costs of the property back in rental income, your doing OK.

In this city its very hard to buy a place that can rent out right away for a break-even or profit after costs. You need to wait a bit and hope that rental prices continue to rise as vacancy remains at 5-6 yr lows.

Id be curious to see any impact by unsold condos converting to rentals down the road on prices.

Posted by Noah | January 31, 2007 8:17 PM

UWSider - Yea, I dont see how the #'s would work for that idea either. It would have to be a result of necessity and market trends rather than by intended business model. Some developers might be forced to change strategy and rent out unsold units, how many there may be at occupancy date.

Posted by Noah | January 31, 2007 8:19 PM

Hey Noah - As I mentioned, I'm not really too familiar with the Manhattan market, but I am curious as to how it compares to San Francisco. What sort of downpayment would you generally need to make the rent cover the monthly payments? Are there strict rent control laws there?

Posted by Andrew Maury | February 1, 2007 12:31 AM

It all depends. But putting 30-35% down for these property's would probably make the rental come close to breakeven..

No rent control laws for owners trying to rent out their units. They could try for whatever rent they believe the market will pay; in the end the market will dictate the rental price.

Rent control was more for major landlords operating multiple buildings who had more control of rental prices.

Posted by Noah | February 1, 2007 8:54 AM

I'm interested in getting an investment property on the upper east side. How can I get info on the new construction at 86th/Lex and 86th/3rd by Extell and Related?

Posted by mary | February 7, 2007 8:14 AM

What do you think of the new condos in Chelsea? Is there an over development in your opinion in Manhattan the will eventually drive down both the prices and rental?

Posted by Jen | February 11, 2007 2:54 AM

Are last floor walkup good buying investments (5th and 6th flr) when a possible 2nd or 3rd floor apt for about same price might be available in 3-4 months. Is selling time longer and mkt value less for apt on last floor in a prime nyc location walk up building? Need Help?

Posted by dan | February 26, 2007 3:57 PM

Hi
My daugher is gettig a freelance job at midtown mathantan. She is only getting $900.00 per week. I figure out she will be spending all the salarry on rent and income tax, I am thinking to buy her somethig in cash in the 500-750 range but allow her to have a monthy payment of about 1-1.5,000.00 monthly payment to defer some of her tax. Where and how should I start to look.

Posted by Larry kwan | April 17, 2007 12:23 PM

Just looked at the financials of one of these properties (Gramercy Park), assuming you purchase it as a rental property (as opposed to own home). Obtaining 85% of your pre-tax carrying costs looks to be a significant challenge given the asking price.

With a 90% 30 yr fixed rate mortgage (at say 6.75%), the total monthly payments come to about $3,400 per month. If you low-ball, and make a successful bid of $450k (which would be close to $1,100 per sq. ft), then the overall monthlys come to approx $3,150 pm.

Based on recent rentals in the building, monthly rent is likely to be $1,800 p.m., versus monthly costs of $3,150 (based on the lower bid).

Achieving 85% coverage of costs looks to be unrealistic, unless one opts for an interest only mortgage - have I missed something fundamental here?

As always, a great post Noah.


Posted by ollie | July 18, 2007 3:45 PM

It would be nice if you posted more articles like this. I found this very interesting and insightful.

Posted by Anonymous | July 19, 2007 1:45 PM

The Primary Residence Exclusion is a perfect way to buy, build up equity, and then sell in two plus years and get free money, either $250,000 if single or $500,000 if married. Do this over and over again and you will see the riches come pouring in.
Mark

Posted by Mark C. Hughes | July 20, 2007 4:13 PM

Post a comment


To help maintain the integrity of the conversation we ask that each user simply paste the keyword (below in red) into the confirmation field below. Sorry, but if you forget this step, your comments will not be saved!