Developers Beware: 421-A Overhaul Coming
A: Mayor Bloomberg signed legislation a few days before the new year that reforms the 421-A property tax exemption program offered to developers as an incentive to stimulate building. The changes basically expand the area for the program, extend tax benefits to 25 years for developers who promote affordable housing, set limits on benefits any market rate unit can receive, and the creation of an affordable housing trust fund.

Details on this new legislation could be found at NYC.gov website.
Here are the details of the changes to the 421-A benefits program that will affect developers:
Basically the program changes focused on benefits to stimulate more affordable housing, something that developers probably didn't want to hear. It's almost as if the government recognized the changing housing market in NYC and wanted to limit development a bit to control the number of new development luxury units that eventually will hit the open market. These changes seem to do that; unless I'm interpreting this wrong in which case I hope someone will mention why.
One aspect of the program also seems restricting, which is:
Only the first $65,000 of an apartment's assessed value would receive the 421-a tax exemptionDoes this mean that future tax abatements for new developments under these changes will NOT give buyers of new developments the fuill tax incentives that they got used to in past years? If a property is assessed at $750,000, than that means $685,000 of the full property value will be normally taxed, and $65,000 will be abated? Again, am I wrong in this interpretation?
According to METRO article:
"This bill doesn’t go far enough," Avella said. "We're pushing it back and forth, making some tweaks but not addressing the two major problems: Building affordable housing and eliminating this huge windfall for developers. Why should we give tax breaks to developers of luxury and market-rate housing anywhere in the city?"Thoughts please!! I have a feeling I am interpreting this wrong in terms of ultimate benefits for developing



Posted by Peter Comitini
Tue Jan 2nd, 2007 09:44 PM
Nope you got it right. The incentive is to invest in building affordable housing in parts of the city overlooked by the real estate boom; not in subsidising luxury developments in Manhattan and downtown Brooklyn. At this point the program is having a negative effect by causing an oversupply in the luxury areas of the city anyway. Should taxpayers bear the burden of tax exemptions to stimulate business in a hyper-stimulated marketplace?
Posted by jud
Wed Jan 3rd, 2007 01:39 PM
This will have an immediate effect to provide incentive to further spread where people live.
does this legislation correct any previous abatements or is it only for future?
Posted by Reverb
Wed Jan 3rd, 2007 05:41 PM
I'd like to know whether existing abatements & recent developments will be grandfathered into the old 421-a policy.
Posted by I am not Star Jones
Sun Jan 14th, 2007 06:09 PM
this is a fantastic, informative site.
Posted by Jay
Mon Apr 30th, 2007 11:15 PM
Reverb,
I believe new construction projects that broke ground or filed in 2006 will be grandfathered in.
That is what a broker told us.
Posted by commanderglenn
Wed May 23rd, 2007 09:41 AM
Does the $65,000 limit apply to 80/20 deals?
Posted by Orlando realtor
Sun Apr 26th, 2009 11:29 AM
Looks as though everybody if suffering.
Posted by uggs nederland
Wed Aug 25th, 2010 03:40 AM
uggs nederland is known as the best sheepskin boots for both fashionable look and ultimate comfort.Apparently, the fashionable colors for uggs kopen are changing but have some succession.